# Anti-brane singularities as red herrings

**Authors:** J. Bl{\aa}b\"ack, F. F Gautason, A. Ruip\'erez, T. Van Riet

arXiv: 1907.05295 · 2019-12-06

## TL;DR

This paper reviews how brane polarization can resolve unphysical singularities near anti-branes, extends the analysis to anti-D6 branes, and presents numerical evidence for stable solutions that bypass existing no-go theorems.

## Contribution

It improves the understanding of anti-D6 brane polarization into KK5 dipoles and proposes a way to achieve stable, well-behaved solutions with zero D6 charge, circumventing previous no-go results.

## Key findings

- Brane polarization resolves singularities for anti-D3-branes.
- Numerical evidence supports stable solutions for anti-D6-branes with zero D6 charge.
- Meta-stable states can exist without violating supergravity constraints.

## Abstract

Unphysical 3-form flux singularities near anti-branes have been argued to get resolved in the classical supergravity regime when brane polarisation is properly taken into account. The only example that does not seem to fit this logic is the $\bar{\text{D6}}$-brane because of a no-go theorem for well behaved supergravity solutions with negative D6 charge. In this paper we first review the existing results demonstrating how brane polarisation resolves singularities for $\bar{\text{D3}}$-branes and then we improve on the description of the polarisation of $\bar{\text{D6}}$-branes into KK5 dipoles. We argue that the meta-stable state carries exactly zero (anti-)D6 charge, which is the unique way around the no-go theorem. We then provide numerical evidence for well-behaved solutions that describe such meta-stable states.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1907.05295/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1907.05295/full.md

## References

70 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1907.05295/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1907.05295