# Using Muon Rings for the Calibration of the Cherenkov Telescope Array: A   Systematic Review of the Method and its Potential Accuracy

**Authors:** Markus Gaug, Steven Fegan, Alison Mitchell, Maria-Concetta, Maccarone, Teresa Mineo, Akira Okumura

arXiv: 1907.04375 · 2019-07-11

## TL;DR

This paper reviews the muon ring calibration method for Cherenkov telescopes, evaluates its potential accuracy for the CTA, and proposes improvements to address systematic effects and enhance calibration precision.

## Contribution

It provides a comprehensive review of muon ring calibration, identifies new systematic effects, and suggests analytical methods for improved accuracy in CTA applications.

## Key findings

- Identified additional systematic effects affecting calibration accuracy.
- Proposed new analytical methods to incorporate systematic effects.
- Estimated muon data rates for calibration and monitoring tasks.

## Abstract

The analysis of ring images produced by muons in an Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescope (IACT) provides a powerful and precise method to calibrate the IACT optical throughput and monitor its optical point-spread function (PSF). First proposed by the Whipple collaboration in the early 90's, this method has been refined by the so-called second generation of IACT experiments: H.E.S.S., MAGIC and VERITAS. We review here the progress made with these instruments and investigate the applicability of the method as the primary throughput calibration method for the different telescope types forming the future Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA). We find several additional systematic effects not yet taken into account by previous authors and propose several new analytical methods to include these in the analysis. Slight modifications in hardware and analysis need to be made to ensure that such a calibration works as accurately as required for the CTA. We derive analytic estimates for the expected muon data rates for optical throughput calibration, camera pixel flat-fielding and monitoring of the optical PSF. The achievable statistical and systematic uncertainties of the method are also assessed.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1907.04375/full.md

## Figures

35 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1907.04375/full.md

## References

153 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1907.04375/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1907.04375