Some classes of generating functions for generalized Hermite- and Chebyshev-type polynomials: Analysis of Euler's formula
Neslihan Kilar, Yilmaz Simsek

TL;DR
This paper develops generating functions for new classes of special polynomials, explores their relations with classical functions using Euler's formula, and provides formulas, identities, and applications for these polynomials.
Contribution
It introduces new generating functions for various special polynomials and establishes their relations with classical functions using Euler's formula.
Findings
Derived generating functions for new polynomial families
Established relations among special functions and polynomials
Provided formulas, identities, and numerical applications
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to construct generating functions for new families of special polynomials including the Appel polynomials, the Hermite-Kamp\`e de F\`eriet polynomials, the Milne-Thomson type polynomials, parametric kinds of Apostol type numbers and polynomials. Using Euler's formula, relations among special functions, Hermite-type polynomials, the Chebyshev polynomials and the Dickson polynomials are given. Using generating functions and their functional equations, various formulas and identities are given. With help of computational formula for new families of special polynomials, some of their numerical values are given. Using hypegeometric series, trigonometric functions and the Euler's formula, some applications related to Hermite-type polynomials are presented. Finally, further remarks, observations and comments about generating functions for new families of special…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Some classes of generating functions for generalized Hermite- and Chebyshev-type polynomials: Analysis of Euler’s formula
Neslihan Kilar and Yilmaz Simsek
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science University of Akdeniz TR-07058 Antalya-TURKEY
E-mail: [email protected] and [email protected]
**Abstract **
The aim of this paper is to construct generating functions for new families of special polynomials including the Appel polynomials, the Hermite-Kampè de Fèriet polynomials, the Milne-Thomson type polynomials, parametric kinds of Apostol type numbers and polynomials. Using Euler’s formula, relations among special functions, Hermite-type polynomials, the Chebyshev polynomials and the Dickson polynomials are given. Using generating functions and their functional equations, various formulas and identities are given. With help of computational formula for new families of special polynomials, some of their numerical values are given. Using hypegeometric series, trigonometric functions and the Euler’s formula, some applications related to Hermite-type polynomials are presented. Finally, further remarks, observations and comments about generating functions for new families of special polynomials are given.
Keywords: Appel polynomials, Apostol-Bernoulli type polynomials, Apostol-Euler type polynomials, Hermite-type polynomials, Parametric kinds of Apostol-kind polynomials, Chebyshev polynomials, Dickson polynomials, Milne-Thomson type polynomials, Generating function, Functional equation, Special functions.
MSC Numbers: 05A15, 11B68, 11B73, 26C05, 33B10
1 Introduction
The Euler’s formula yields a important connection among analysis, trigonometry and special functions. This formula also gives relations between trigonometric functions and exponential functions. Because sine and cosine functions are written as sums of the exponential functions. Motivation of this paper is to construct generating functions for new families of polynomials with the help of the Euler’s formula. By using these generating functions and their functional equations, new formulas, identities, recurrence relations and properties of these polynomials, which are the Appel polynomials, Apostol-type polynomials, Hermite-type polynomials, the Chebyshev polynomials, the Dickson polynomials, Milne-Thomson type polynomials, are given. Trigonometric functions, the Euler’s formula and generating functions have applications in many different areas, which are mainly mathematics, statistics, physics, engineering and other sciences. Therefore, it can be stated that the results of this article may be used and applied in these related areas.
Notations and definitions of this paper are presented as follows:
Let , , , and denote the set of positive integers, the set of integers, the set of real numbers, and the set of complex numbers, respectively, . Let , . , denotes the Pochhammer symbol, is defined by
[TABLE]
where dentes the Euler gamma function.
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Let
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Here, takes its principal value such that
[TABLE]
with , . In addition,
[TABLE]
The Euler’s formula, well-known mathematical formula in complex analysis, is given by
[TABLE]
This formula gives the fundamental relationship between the trigonometric functions and the complex exponential function (cf. [7], [34], [35]).
The following generating functions for well-known numbers and polynomials are needed in order give main results of this paper.
Generating function for the Apostol-Bernoulli polynomials of order is given by
[TABLE]
where , when when . Using (1), we have
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
where and denote the Bernoulli polynomials of order and the Apostol-Bernoulli numbers of order , respectively (cf. [35], [37]).
Generating function for the Apostol-Euler polynomials of order is given by
[TABLE]
where . Using (2), we have
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
where and denote the Euler polynomials of order and the Apostol-Euler numbers of order , respectively (cf. [35], [37]).
Generating functions for the polynomials and are defined as follows, respectively
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
(cf. [19], [20], [23], [24], [25], [37]).
By using equations (3) and (4), we have
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
(cf. [19], [20], [23], [24], [25], [37]).
Generating functions for the Chebyshev polynomials of the first and second kinds are given as follows, respectively
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
(cf. [1], [4], [7], [15], [30]).
By using (7) and (8), the following well-known relations between the polynomials and are given
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
By using (7) and (8), the well-known computational formulas for the Chebyshev polynomials of the first and second kinds are given as follows, respectively
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
(cf. [1], [4], [7], [15], [30]).
Generating functions for the Dickson polynomials of the first and second kinds are given as follows, respectively
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
(cf. [14], [21], [28]). The polynomials and are of degree in with real parameter .
By using (13) and (14), the following well-known relation between the polynomials and is given
[TABLE]
Substituting into (13) and (14), we have the following relations, respectively:
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
(cf. [14]).
Generating functions for the Milne-Thomson type polynomials is given by
[TABLE]
where is a number of family of analytic functions or meromorphic functions, any analytic function, and (cf. [32]).
Note that there is one generating function for each value of , and .
Substituting into (17), we have the Appell polynomials which are defined by
[TABLE]
where is a formal power series and
[TABLE]
Setting into (17), we obtain generating functions for special numbers of order :
[TABLE]
Therefore, we have
[TABLE]
For instance, substituting and into (17), we have
[TABLE]
Generating function for the Hermite-Kampè de Fèriet (or Gould-Hopper) polynomials, is given by
[TABLE]
where for with ,
[TABLE]
(cf. [5], [11], [16], [36]). It is well-known that the polynomials are a solution of generalized heat equation.
Generating function for generalized Hermite-Kampè de Fèriet polynomials is given by
[TABLE]
where for and
[TABLE]
such that
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
the sum (21) runs over all restricted partitions (containing at most sizes) of the integer , denoting the number of parts of the partition and the number of parts of size (cf. see for detail [5], [11], [12]).
Using equation (20), an explicit formula for the polynomials is given by
[TABLE]
where denote the largest integer . (cf. [11], [12]).
2 Generating functions for new families of Hermite-type polynomials
and their computation formulas
In this section, we define generating functions for families of Hermite-type polynomials. We give some identities and computation formulas for these polynomials and their generating functions.
Let
[TABLE]
where -tuples , , , .
By combining equation (22) with the Euler’s formula, we obtain
[TABLE]
In order to give an explicit formula for the polynomials , we give following decompositions of equation (23)
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Therefore, by using (2) and (2), we get the following decompositions for the polynomials :
[TABLE]
Lemma 1
Let and . Then we have
[TABLE]
Proof. Combining (2) with (20), we obtain the following functional equation:
[TABLE]
where and . By using above functional equation, we get
[TABLE]
Therefore
[TABLE]
Comparing the coefficients of on both sides of the above equation, we arrive at the desired result.
By using (27), we compute a few values of the polynomials as follows:
For , and , we have
[TABLE]
For , and , we have
[TABLE]
Lemma 2
Let and . Then we have
[TABLE]
Proof. Combining (2) with (20), we get the following functional equation:
[TABLE]
where and . By using above functional equation, we have
[TABLE]
Therefore
[TABLE]
Comparing the coefficients of on both sides of the above equation, we arrive at the desired result.
By using (28), we compute a few values of the polynomials as follows:
For , and , we have
[TABLE]
For , and , we have
[TABLE]
Combining Lemma 1 and Lemma 2 with (26), we obtain an explicit formula for the polynomials by the following theorem:
Theorem 3
Let and . Then we have
[TABLE]
By using (29), we compute a few values of the polynomials as follows:
For , and , we have
[TABLE]
For , and , we have
[TABLE]
Theorem 4
Let . Then we have
[TABLE]
Proof. By using (3), (20) and (2), we obtain the following functional equation:
[TABLE]
By using the above functional equation, we get
[TABLE]
Therefore
[TABLE]
Comparing the coefficients of on both sides of the above equation, we arrive at the desired result.
Theorem 5
Let . Then we have
[TABLE]
Proof. By using (4), (20) and (2), we derive the following functional equation:
[TABLE]
By using above functional equation, we get
[TABLE]
Therefore
[TABLE]
Comparing the coefficients of on both sides of the above equation, we arrive at the desired result.
Combining (30) and (31) with (26), we obtain an explicit formula for the polynomials by the following corollary:
Corollary 6
Let . Then we have
[TABLE]
3 Generating functions for Hermite-based -parametric
Milne-Thomson-type polynomials
By the aid of generating functions in (17) and (22), we construct the following generating functions for Hermite-based -parametric Milne-Thomson-type polynomials:
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
where , -tuples , and ; the function denotes analytic or meromorphic function.
Substituting and into (3), we have
[TABLE]
Thus, we get
[TABLE]
Combining (3) and (3) with (3), we obtain an formula for the polynomials by the following theorem:
Theorem 7
Let and . Then we have
[TABLE]
Theorem 8
Let . Then we have
[TABLE]
Proof. By using (18), (22) and (3), we derive the following functional equation:
[TABLE]
From the above equation, we have
[TABLE]
Therefore
[TABLE]
Comparing the coefficients of on both sides of the above equation we arrive at the desired result.
Theorem 9
Let and . Then we have
[TABLE]
Proof. By using (17), (22) and (3), we derive the following functional equation:
[TABLE]
From the above equation, we obtain
[TABLE]
Therefore
[TABLE]
Comparing the coefficients of on both sides of the above equation we arrive at the desired result.
3.1 Identities for Hermite-based -parametric Milne-Thomson-type
polynomials
By using (3)-(3), we give identities and relations for Milne-Thomson type polynomials and Hermite-type polynomials including Hermite-based -parametric Milne-Thomson-type polynomials.
Theorem 10
Let and . Then we have
[TABLE]
Proof. By using (18), (22) and (3), we derive the following functional equation:
[TABLE]
From the above equation, we have
[TABLE]
Therefore
[TABLE]
Comparing the coefficients of on both sides of the above equation we arrive at the desired result.
By using Euler’s formula, we modify (3) as follows:
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
Observe that when , (40) reduces to the (3). Setting in (40), we have
[TABLE]
Theorem 11
Let . Then we have
[TABLE]
Proof. Combining (17), (40) and (3.1), we get
[TABLE]
Therefore
[TABLE]
Comparing the coefficients of on both sides of the above equation we arrive at the desired result.
Substituting into (41), we have
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
Substituting ,
[TABLE]
and into (3.1), we have
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
where the polynomials were defined by Srivastava at al (cf. [38]). Comparing the coefficients of on both sides of equation (42), we get the following result:
Corollary 12
[TABLE]
Remark 13
When and , the polynomials reduce to following well-known polynomials:
[TABLE]
where the polynomials denote the cosine-Bernoulli polynomials (cf. [20]). When , the polynomials reduce to the Apostol-Bernoulli polynomials of order :
[TABLE]
On the other hand, using (LABEL:MBC2), we have
[TABLE]
Therefore, we obtain
[TABLE]
Comparing the coefficients of on both sides of the above equation, we arrive at the following result:
Corollary 14
Let -tuples . Then we have
[TABLE]
We modify (LABEL:MBC2) as follows:
[TABLE]
where denote the two parametric kinds of Apostol-Euler polynomials of order , which are defined by
[TABLE]
(cf. [38]).
Comparing the coefficients of on both sides of equation (43), we get the following result:
Corollary 15
Let -tuples . Then we have
[TABLE]
Remark 16
When and , the polynomials reduce to the polynomials the cosine-Euler polynomials:
[TABLE]
(cf. [20], [24]). Setting in (44), the polynomials reduce to the Apostol-Euler polynomials of order :
[TABLE]
By using (43), we have
[TABLE]
Therefore
[TABLE]
Comparing the coefficients of on both sides of the above equation we arrive at the following result:
Corollary 17
Let -tuples . Then we have
[TABLE]
By using Euler’s formula, we modify and unify equation (3) as follows:
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
Observe that when , (47) reduces to the (4). Setting in (47), we have
[TABLE]
Theorem 18
Let . Then we have
[TABLE]
Proof. Combining (17), (47) and (3.1), we have
[TABLE]
Therefore
[TABLE]
Comparing the coefficients of on both sides of the above equation we arrive at the desired result.
Substituting ,
[TABLE]
and into (3.1), we have the following equation:
[TABLE]
where the function is a generating function for the two parametric kinds of the Apostol-Bernoulli polynomials of order ,
[TABLE]
(cf. [38]). Thus, using (49), we have the following result:
Corollary 19
Let -tuples . Then we have
[TABLE]
Remark 20
When and , the polynomials reduces to the polynomials , which denote sine-Bernoulli polynomials:
[TABLE]
(cf. [20]). Setting in (50), we have
[TABLE]
By using (49), we have
[TABLE]
Therefore
[TABLE]
Corollary 21
Let -tuples . Then we have
[TABLE]
We modify (49) as follows:
[TABLE]
where denote the two parametric kinds of Apostol-Euler polynomials of order , which are defined by the following generating function:
[TABLE]
(cf. [38]).
By using (51), we get the following result:
Corollary 22
Let -tuples . Then we have
[TABLE]
Remark 23
When and , the polynomials reduce to the polynomials , which denote sine-Euler polynomials:
[TABLE]
(cf. [20], [24]). Setting in (52), we have
[TABLE]
Using (51), we obtain
[TABLE]
Therefore
[TABLE]
By using (LABEL:Esh1), we obtain the following result:
Corollary 24
Let -tuples . Then we have
[TABLE]
4 Relations among the polynomials , trigonometric functions and hypergeometric
function
In this section, we study the following two variable polynomials
[TABLE]
where -tuples , the polynomials are given in equation (22). We set . We investigate some properties of the polynomials . We give relations among the polynomials , trigonometric functions and hypergeometric functions. The polynomials are also related to other special polynomials, such as the Milne-Thomson-type polynomials and the generalized Hermite-Kampè de Fèriet polynomials.
A series representation of the polynomials is given by
[TABLE]
Alternative forms of the above generating functions are given as follows:
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
where {}_{p}F_{q}\left[\begin{array}[]{c}\alpha_{1},\ldots,\alpha_{p}\\ \beta_{1},\ldots,\beta_{q}\end{array};z\right] denotes hypergeometric function, defined by
[TABLE]
A series in (58) converges for all if , and for if and also all , are real or complex parameters with (cf. [2], [6], [27], [39], [42]).
By using the above generating functions, we obtain the following well-known identity:
[TABLE]
Replacing by , we modify (59), we have
[TABLE]
Observe that
[TABLE]
By using the Riemann integral, we derive some identities and formulas including the polynomials , the Bernoulli numbers and other special polynomials.
Theorem 25
Let and . Then we have
[TABLE]
Proof. Integrating both sides of equation (55) from [math] to with respect to the variable , we get
[TABLE]
After some elementary calculations in the above equation, then combining with (3) and (4), respectively, we obtain
[TABLE]
Comparing the coefficients of on both sides of the above equation, we arrive at the desired result.
Theorem 26
Let and . Then we have
[TABLE]
Proof. Using (62) and (55), we get
[TABLE]
Therefore
[TABLE]
Combining the above equation with (1), we obtain
[TABLE]
Comparing the coefficients of on both sides of the above equation, we arrive at the desired result.
Combining (61) with (63), we arrive at the following corollary:
Corollary 27
Let and . Then we have
[TABLE]
By using (55), we get the following well-known identity for the numbers :
Corollary 28
Let . Then we have
[TABLE]
Remark 29
In work of Srivastava (cf. [34, Eq. (7.17)]), we have the following well-known formula including the Stirling numbers of the second kind and the Bernoulli numbers of order :
[TABLE]
Substituting into the above formula, since , we also arrive at (65).
The polynomials are linear combinations of the polynomials , presented by the following theorem.
Theorem 30
Let and . Then we have
[TABLE]
Proof. By using (20), (22) and (55), we derive the following functional equation:
[TABLE]
From the above equation, we have
[TABLE]
Therefore
[TABLE]
Comparing the coefficients of on both sides of the above equation, we arrive at the desired result.
Similarly, the polynomials , , and are also linear combinations of the polynomials , presented as follows:
Substituting into (38), (36) and (37), after that combining the last equation with equation (54), we arrive at the following identities, respectively:
Corollary 31
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
5 Relations among Hermite-type polynomials and Chebyshev-type
polynomials and Dickson polynomials
In this section, we give relations among the Hermite-type polynomials, the generalized Hermite-Kampè de Fèriet polynomials, and the Chebyshev polynomials.
Let . By using (59), we modify (66) as follows:
[TABLE]
Therefore, we define the following polynomials:
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Explicit formulas for these polynomials are given as follows:
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Combining equations (68) and (69) with (5) and (6), respectively, we arrive at the following theorem:
Theorem 32
Let . Then we have
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Substituting into (68) and (69), we obtain relations among the Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind , the Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind , the generalized Hermite-Kampè de Fèriet polynomials by the following theorem:
Theorem 33
Let . Then we have
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
Using the polynomials and , we arrive at the following corollary:
Corollary 34
Let . Then we have
[TABLE]
and for
[TABLE]
By (15), (16), (72) and (73), we obtain the following result which are related to the Dickson polynomials, the polynomials , and the polynomials :
Corollary 35
Let . Then we have
[TABLE]
Corollary 36
Let . Then we have
[TABLE]
6 Identities and relations including Chebyshev polynomials and
trigonometric polynomials
Here, we give some identities and formulas which are relations among the Chebyshev polynomials, the Dickson polynomials, the Bernoulli numbers, the Euler numbers the Stirling numbers and other special polynomials.
Substituting into Theorem 2.9 of [19], then combining (72) and (73), we have the following result:
Corollary 37
Let . Then we have
[TABLE]
By using (15), (16) and (74), we also obtain the following result:
Corollary 38
Let . Then we have
[TABLE]
Substituting into Theorem 1 of [20], we have
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Combining above equations with (72) and (73), respectively, we obtain the following results:
Corollary 39
Let . Then we have
[TABLE]
Corollary 40
Let . Then we have
[TABLE]
By using (15), (16), (75) and (76), we also obtain the following result:
Corollary 41
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
On the other hand, substituting into Theorem 6 of [20], we have
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Combining above equations with (72) and (73), respectively, we obtain the following results:
Corollary 42
Let . Then we have
[TABLE]
Corollary 43
Let . The we have
[TABLE]
By using (15), (16), (77) and (78) we also obtain the following result:
Corollary 44
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
By applying derivative operator to (3) and (4) with respect to , then with respect to , we obtain the following partial differential equation:
[TABLE]
Comparing the coefficients of on both sides of the above equation, we have
[TABLE]
Similarly, for , we have
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Substituting into (79), we obtain the following well-known identity as follows:
[TABLE]
(cf. [30]).
Theorem 45
Let . Then we have
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Proof. By applying derivative operator to (3) and (4) with respect to and , we obtain the following partial differential equations, respectively:
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
From the above functional equations, we obtain
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Comparing the coefficients of on both sides of the above equations, we arrive at the desired result.
Theorem 46
Let . Then we have
[TABLE]
Proof. By applying derivative operator to (3) with respect to , we obtain the following partial differential equation:
[TABLE]
From the above equation, we have
[TABLE]
Comparing the coefficients of on both sides of the above equation, we arrive at the desired result.
Remark 47
By using (72), (73) and (80), we arrive at the equation (10).
Theorem 48
Let . Then we have
[TABLE]
Proof. By applying derivative operator to (4) with respect to , we obtain the following partial differential equation:
[TABLE]
From the above equation, we get
[TABLE]
Comparing the coefficients of on both sides of the above equation, we arrive at the desired result.
Remark 49
By using (72), (73) and (81), we arrive at the equation (9). On the other hand, multiplying (80) by and (81) by and then side-by-side adding, and multiplying (80) by and (81) by and then side-by-side subtracting, then after some calculation, we arrive at the equation (61).
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] M. Abramowitz, I.A. Stegun (Eds), Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, 1972.
- 2[2] W.N. Bailey, Products of generalized Hypergeometric Series, Proc. London Math. Soc. 28 (2) (1928) 242–254.
- 3[3] A. Bayad, Y. Simsek, H.M. Srivastava, Some array type polynomials associated with special numbers and polynomials, Appl. Math. Comput. 244 (2014) 149–157.
- 4[4] A.T. Benjamin, L. Ericksen, P. Jayawant, M. Shattuck, Combinatorial trigonometry with Chebyshev polynomials, J. Stat. Plann. Inference 140 (8) (2010) 2157–2160.
- 5[5] G. Bretti, P.E. Ricci, Multidimensional extensions of the Bernoulli and Appell polynomials, Taiwanese J. Math. 8 (3) (2004) 415–428.
- 6[6] J. Choi, A.K. Rathie, A note on two results involving products of generalized hypergeometric functions, Int. J. Math. Anal. 10 (12) (2016) 579–583.
- 7[7] L. Comtet, Advanced Combinatorics. D. Reidel Publication Company, Dordrecht-Holland/ Boston-U.S.A., 1974.
- 8[8] W. Daniel, A Tiling Approach to Chebyshev Polynomials, Harvey Mudd College, Department of Mathematics, Thesis, 2007.
