Reconstructing coronal hole areas with EUHFORIA and adapted WSA model: optimising the model parameters
Eleanna Asvestari, Stephan G. Heinemann, Mannuela Temmer, Jens, Pomoell, Emilia Kilpua, Jasmina Magdalenic, Stefaan Poedts

TL;DR
This study compares EUHFORIA's WSA model with EUV observations to optimize model parameters, specifically the source surface and inner boundary heights, improving the accuracy of coronal hole area reconstructions.
Contribution
It systematically investigates the impact of source surface and inner boundary heights on coronal hole modeling, proposing optimized parameter ranges for better accuracy.
Findings
Default model heights are inadequate for accurate CH area modeling.
Lower heights for model boundaries improve the match with EUV observations.
184 parameter combinations were tested to identify optimal model settings.
Abstract
The adopted WSA model embedded in EUHFORIA (EUropean Heliospheric FORecasting Information Asset) is compared to EUV observations. According to the standard paradigm coronal holes are sources of open flux thus we use remote sensing EUV observations and \textsc{catch} (Collection of Analysis Tools for Coronal Holes) to extract CH areas and compare them to the open flux areas modelled by EUHFORIA. From the adopted WSA model we employ only the Potential Field Source Surface (PFSS) model for the inner corona and the Schatten Current Sheet (SCS) model for the outer (PFSS+SCS). The height, , of the outer boundary of the PFSS, known as the source surface, and the height, , of the inner boundary of the SCS are important parameters affecting the modelled CH areas. We investigate the impact the two model parameters can have in the modelled results. We vary …
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
