Gluing Theorems for Subharmonic Functions
Bulat N. Khabibullin, Enzhe Menshikova

TL;DR
This paper advances the technique of gluing subharmonic functions, enhancing its theoretical framework and potential applications in analyzing the distribution of roots and masses of holomorphic and subharmonic functions.
Contribution
It develops and improves the gluing technique for subharmonic functions, providing a stronger foundation for future applications.
Findings
Enhanced method for gluing subharmonic functions
Improved understanding of root and mass distribution
Foundation for future research applications
Abstract
In our articles of recent years, the technique of gluing two subharmonic functions turned out to be very useful in studying the distribution of the roots or masses of holomorphic or subharmonic functions, respectively. Here we develop and improve this technique. Its applications will be given in our further works.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHolomorphic and Operator Theory · Algebraic and Geometric Analysis · Advanced Topics in Algebra
Gluing Theorems for Subharmonic Functions
**Bulat N. Khabibullin111This study was financially supported by the Russian Science Foundation (projects No. 18-01-00002.) **
Enzhe Menshikova
Abstract
In our articles of recent years, the technique of gluing two subharmonic functions turned out to be very useful in studying the distribution of the roots or masses of holomorphic or subharmonic functions, respectively. Here we develop and improve this technique. Its applications will be given in our further works.
MSC 2010: 31B5, 3A05, 3C05, 32A60
Keywords: subharmonic function, Green’s function, potential, Riesz measure, harmonic continuation, plurisubharmonic function
1 Introduction
As usual, , and are the sets of all *natural, real * and complex numbers, respectively; is French natural series, and .
For we denote by the -dimensional real Euclidean space with the standard Euclidean norm for and the distance function .
For a subset , we denote by and the classes of all harmonic (affine for m = 1) and subharmonic (locally convex for ) functions on an open set , respectively. The basis of our note is
Gluing Theorem A** ([14, Theorem 2.4.5], [9, Corollary 2.4.4]).**
Let be an open set in , and let be a subset of . If , , and
[TABLE]
then the formula
[TABLE]
defines a subharmonic function on .
Important applications of Theorem A can be found in our articles [10], [11], [13].
2 Basic definitions, notations and conventions
The reader can skip this Section 2 and return to it only if necessary.
2.1 Sets, order, topology.
For the real line with Euclidean norm-module ,
[TABLE]
unless otherwise specified. An open connected (sub-)set of is a (sub-)interval of . The Alexandroff one-point compactification of is denoted by .
The same symbol [math] is used, depending on the context, to denote the number zero, the origin, zero vector, zero function, zero measure, etc.
Given and , we set
[TABLE]
Thus, the basis of open (respectively closed) neighborhood of the point is open (respectively closed) balls (respectively ) centered at with radius .
Given a subset of , the closure , the* interior* and the boundary will always be taken relative . For we write if . An open connected (sub-)set of is a (sub-)domain of .
2.2 Functions.
Let are sets. We denote by the set of all functions . The value of an arbitrary function is not necessarily defined for all . The restriction of a function f to is denoted by f\bigm{|}_{S}. We set
[TABLE]
A function is said to be extended numerical. For extended numerical functions , we set
[TABLE]
For we write if and for all , and we write if for all . For , and a set , we write ‘‘ on ’’ or ‘‘ on ’’ if f\bigm{|}_{S\cap D}=g\bigm{|}_{S\cap D} or f\bigm{|}_{S\cap D}\leq g\bigm{|}_{S\cap D} respectively.
For , we set , , . So, is positive on if , and we write ‘‘ on ’’.
The class contains the minus-infinity function identically equal to ;
[TABLE]
If , then we can to use the inversion in the sphere centered at the point :
[TABLE]
For a subset , the classes and consist of the restrictions to of harmonic and subharmonic functions in some (in general, its own for each function) open set containing . The class are defined like previous class (2.5).
By we denote constants, and constant functions, in general, depend on and, unless otherwise specified, only on them, where the dependence on dimension of will be not specified and not discussed; .
3 General Gluing Theorems
Gluing Theorem 1**.**
Let and be a pair of open subsets in , and be a pair of functions such that
[TABLE]
Then the function
[TABLE]
is subharmonic on .
Proof.
It is enough to apply Gluing Theorem A twice:
- [O0]
to one pair of functions
[TABLE]
under condition (3.10) realizing condition (1.1); 2. [O]
to another pair of functions
[TABLE]
under condition (3.11) realizing condition (1.1).
These two glued subharmonic functions coincide at the open intersection and give subharmonic function defined in (3.2).
∎
Gluing Theorem 2** (quantitative version).**
Let and be a pair of open subsets in , and and be a pair of functions such that
[TABLE]
If we choose the function
[TABLE]
then the function from (3.2) is subharmonic on .
Proof.
The function from definition (3.6) is subharmonic on since this function has a form with , . In addition, by construction (3.6), for each , we obtain
[TABLE]
Thus, we have (3.10). Besides, by construction (3.6), for each , we obtain
[TABLE]
Thus, we have (3.11), and our Gluing Theorem 2 follows from Gluing Theorem 1. ∎
Remark 1**.**
Theorems of this section can be easily transferred to the cone of plurisubharmonic functions [9, Corollary 2.9.15]. We sought to formulate our theorems and their proofs with the possibility of their fast transport to the plurisubharmonic functions and to abstract potential theories with more general constructions based on the theories of harmonic spaces and sheaves in the spirit of books [4], [3], [5], [2], [1], etc.
4 Gluing with the Green Function
Definition 1** ([14], [7], [12]).**
For , we set
[TABLE]
Reminder, that a set is called polar if there is a function such that
[TABLE]
where the set is minus-infinity -set for the function ,
[TABLE]
is the outer capacity of .
Let be an open proper subset in .
Consider a point and subsets such that
[TABLE]
Let be a domain in such that
[TABLE]
Such domain possesses the generalized Green’s function (see [7, 5.7.2], [8, Ch. 5, 2]) with pole at the point described by the following properties:
[TABLE]
Properties (4.5) for the generalized Green’s function from (4.3)–(4.4) are well known [14, 4.4], [7, 5.7], and property (4.3) follows from 0<g(\cdot,o)\in C\bigl{(}D\setminus\{o\}\bigr{)} on .
Gluing Theorem 3**.**
Under conditions (4.3) suppose that a function satisfy constraints above and below in the form
[TABLE]
Every domain with inclusions (4.4) possesses the generalized Green’s function with pole , properties (4.5) and constant of (4.5M) such that the choice of function
[TABLE]
Proof.
It is enough to apply Gluing Theorem 2 with
[TABLE]
according to the references written above the relations in (4.6)–(4.7). ∎
Given and , a set
[TABLE]
is called a outer -parallel set [15, Ch. I,§ 4]. Easy to install the following
Proposition 1**.**
Let a subset be connected, and . Then is connected, , and there is a regular for the Dirichlet problem domain such that
[TABLE]
For v\in L^{1}\bigl{(}\partial B(x,r)\bigr{)}, we define the averaging value of at the point as
[TABLE]
where the normalized by surface measure on the sphere .
Gluing Theorem 4**.**
Let be an open subset, and be a connected set such that there is a point
[TABLE]
Let be a number such that
[TABLE]
and be a domain from Proposition 1 satisfying (4.9). Let be a function satisfying constraints above and below in the form
[TABLE]
Then , and there is a function satisfying (4.7h)–(4.7+), i. e.,
[TABLE]
Proof.
We have since the function is continuous in [8, Theorem 1.14]. The function can be transformed using the Perron – Wiener – Brelot method (into the open ‘‘layer’’ from boundary of this layer) to a new subharmonic function on such that and on . This follow from the principle of subordination (domination) for harmonic continuations and the maximum principle that
[TABLE]
If we choose in Gluing Theorem 3 for the role a set the set , and instead of the set , then, by construction (4.7v)–(4.7V) and conditions (4.7h)–(4.7o) , we get series of conclusions (4.14) of Theorem 4. ∎
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Arsove M., Leutwiler Y. Algebraic Potential Theory, Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society 23 :226, Providence, Rhode Island, 1980.
- 2[2] J. Bliedner, W. Hansen, Potential Theory. An Analytic and Probabilistic Approach to Balayage, Berlin: Springer, 1986.
- 3[3] Bauer, H.: Harmonische Räume und ihre Potentialtheorie. Lecture Notes, 22 , Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer, 1966.
- 4[4] Boboc N., Bucur G. Order and convexity in potential theory. In: Potential Theory Surveys and Problems. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1344 , Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer, 1988.
- 5[5] Boboc N., Bucur G., Cornea A., Höllein H. Order and Convexity in Potential Theory: H-Cones, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 853 , Berlin : Springer-Verlag, 1981.
- 6[6] Constantinescu C., Cornea A. Potential theory on harmonic spaces. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer, 1972.
- 7[7] Hayman W. K., Kennedy P. B. Subharmonic functions, 1 , London etc.: Acad. Press, 1976.
- 8[8] Helms L. L. Introduction to Potential Theory, New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1969.
