Weak integral forms and the sixth Kaplansky conjecture
Dmitriy Rumynin

TL;DR
This paper proves that finite dimensional semisimple Hopf algebras with a weak integral form are of Frobenius type, connecting integral forms to algebraic structure in the context of the sixth Kaplansky conjecture.
Contribution
It explicitly states and proves a folklore result linking weak integral forms to Frobenius type in semisimple Hopf algebras, using a historical argument.
Findings
Finite dimensional semisimple Hopf algebras with weak integral forms are of Frobenius type.
The proof uses an argument similar to Fossum's, predating the Kaplansky conjectures.
The note clarifies a previously unpublished result referenced by Cuadra and Meir.
Abstract
It is a short unpublished note from 1998. I make it public because Cuadra and Meir refer to it in their paper. We precisely state and prove a folklore result that if a finite dimensional semisimple Hopf algebra admits a weak integral form then it is of Frobenius type. We use an argument similar to that of Fossum \cite{fos}, which predates the Kaplansky conjectures.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models · Advanced Topics in Algebra · Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics
Weak integral forms
and the sixth Kaplansky conjecture
Dmitriy Rumynin
Mathematics Department, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, U.K.
(Date: May 21, 1998)
Abstract.
It is a short unpublished note from 1998. I make it public because Cuadra and Meir refer to it in their paper [1].
We precisely state and prove a folklore result that if a finite dimensional semisimple Hopf algebra admits a weak integral form then it is of Frobenius type. We use an argument similar to that of Fossum [2], which predates the Kaplansky conjectures.
1991 Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary 16W30
The research was partially supported by NSF
Let be a semisimple Hopf algebra of dimension over an algebraically closed field of zero characteristic. We say that is of Frobenius type if the degree of of any irreducible representation of divides . The sixth Kaplansky conjecture [3] is that no Hopf algebra not of Frobenius type exists.
The Hopf algebra operations on are denoted , , , and . Let us choose such that . We define by . We fix a simple -module of dimension from now on. The representation is . Its character is . We denote the indecomposable central idempotent corresponding to by .
Lemma 1**.**
The identity holds.
Proof. Let . Using Larson’s orthogonality relations [4], we see that
[TABLE]
while for a different irreducible character
[TABLE]
Thus, it suffices to show that belongs to the center of . Pick . We recall that by the Larson-Radford theorem [5]. We also note that because of the similar trace property. We start with the equality
[TABLE]
This implies that is central since
[TABLE]
Let be a subring of . By a weak -form of , we understand an -form of . This is a free -submodule with an -basis that is a -basis of and the coefficients and belong to . These coefficients appear if one writes down and in terms of the basis, i.e. and keeping summation by the matching sub- and super-scripts in mind. The proof of the following theorem is based on the idea of [2].
Theorem 2**.**
Assume that is a UFD (unique factorization domain). If admits a weak -form then .
Proof. Pick . Let . The -module is torsion-free and, therefore, free since is a UFD. Let be an -basis of . Since is simple, it is also a -basis of .
We can write elements with as matrices in this basis. If then all coefficients of belong to . In particular, belongs to . By Lemma 1,
[TABLE]
The right part is apriori a matrix with coefficients in . Thus, as a coefficient of the left part.
Let be the ring of integer algebraic numbers. The following corollary is straightforward.
Corollary 3**.**
If there exists a collection of UFDs such that admits a weak -form for each and then is of Frobenius type.
Corollary 4**.**
If admits a weak -form for an algebraic number field then is of Frobenius type.
Proof. It suffices to consider the collection of discrete valuation rings of for all -adic valuations and to apply Corollary 3.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] J. Cuadra, E. Meir, On the existence of orders in semisimple Hopf algebras, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 368 (2016), no. 4, 2547–2562.
- 2[2] T. V. Fossum, Characters and centers of symmetric algebras, J. Algebra 16 (1970), 4–13.
- 3[3] I. Kaplansky, Bialgebras, University of Chicago, 1975.
- 4[4] R. G. Larson, Characters of Hopf algebras, J. Algebra 17 (1971), 352–268.
- 5[5] R. G. Larson and D. E. Radford, Semisimple cosemisimple Hopf algebras, Amer. J. Math. 109 (1987), 287–295.
