Machine learning based white matter models with permeability: An experimental study in cuprizone treated in-vivo mouse model of axonal demyelination
Ioana Hill, Marco Palombo, Mathieu Santin, Francesca Branzoli,, Anne-Charlotte Philippe, Demian Wassermann, Marie-Stephane Aigrot, Bruno, Stankoff, Anne Baron-Van Evercooren, Mehdi Felfi, Dominique Langui, Hui, Zhang, Stephane Lehericy, Alexandra Petiet, Daniel C. Alexander

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that machine learning models can accurately estimate axonal permeability parameters from diffusion MRI data, correlating strongly with histological measures and serving as potential biomarkers for demyelinating diseases like Multiple Sclerosis.
Contribution
The paper introduces a machine learning approach, specifically a random forest model, to estimate intra-axonal water exchange time as a biomarker for demyelination, validated with in-vivo mouse data and histology.
Findings
Strong correlation between RF estimates and EM measurements ({ ho_ au}i=0.82, { ho_f}=0.98)
RF model accurately estimates parameters even with realistic noise levels
Significant decrease in { au}i in demyelinated mice compared to controls
Abstract
The intra-axonal water exchange time {\tau}i, a parameter associated with axonal permeability, could be an important biomarker for understanding demyelinating pathologies such as Multiple Sclerosis. Diffusion-Weighted MRI is sensitive to changes in permeability, however, the parameter has remained elusive due to the intractability of the mathematical models that incorporate it. Machine learning based computational models can potentially be used to estimate such parameters, and recently, a theoretical framework using a random forest (RF) suggests this is a promising approach. In this study, we adopt such an RF approach and experimentally investigate its suitability as a biomarker for demyelinating pathologies through direct comparison with histology. For this, we use an in-vivo cuprizone (CPZ) mouse model of demyelination with available ex-vivo electron microscopy (EM) data. We test our…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
