Simple vs complex temporal recurrences for video saliency prediction
Panagiotis Linardos, Eva Mohedano, Juan Jose Nieto, Noel E. O'Connor,, Xavier Giro-i-Nieto, Kevin McGuinness

TL;DR
This study compares simple and complex recurrence methods in neural networks for video saliency prediction, demonstrating that both approaches achieve state-of-the-art results using pre-trained models and fine-tuning.
Contribution
It introduces and evaluates two recurrence modifications—ConvLSTM and exponential moving average—for temporal integration in saliency prediction models.
Findings
Both methods achieve state-of-the-art results.
The simpler exponential moving average performs comparably to ConvLSTM.
Pre-trained models fine-tuned on DHF1K improve performance.
Abstract
This paper investigates modifying an existing neural network architecture for static saliency prediction using two types of recurrences that integrate information from the temporal domain. The first modification is the addition of a ConvLSTM within the architecture, while the second is a conceptually simple exponential moving average of an internal convolutional state. We use weights pre-trained on the SALICON dataset and fine-tune our model on DHF1K. Our results show that both modifications achieve state-of-the-art results and produce similar saliency maps. Source code is available at https://git.io/fjPiB.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsVisual Attention and Saliency Detection · Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques · Image and Video Quality Assessment
MethodsTanh Activation · Sigmoid Activation · Convolution · ConvLSTM
