Do wind-generated waves under steady forcing propagate primarily in the downwind direction?
Paul A. Hwang, David W. Wang, James Yungel, Robert N. Swift, and, William B. Krabill

TL;DR
This study challenges the long-held assumption that wind-generated ocean waves predominantly propagate downwind, presenting photographic evidence of crosswind and multi-directional wave patterns that vary with fetch and location.
Contribution
The paper provides empirical photographic evidence showing that wind-generated waves often propagate in directions other than the wind, revealing a fundamental flaw in current wave propagation assumptions.
Findings
Waves display crosswind and multi-directional patterns in photographs.
Wave propagation directions vary with fetch and location.
The assumption of downwind propagation is often invalid in observed wave fields.
Abstract
Measuring the directional distribution of ocean waves is a difficult task in ocean wave research. For many decades, wind-generated waves are assumed to propagate primarily in the wind direction. The concept is applied either implicitly or explicitly in the formulation of the wind input function and the design of the wave directional distribution function. Photographs of the ocean surface wave fields under steady wind forcing, however, display very different directional properties. In the near shore region, the surface undulations are dominantly crosswind. As the fetch increases, the geometry of surface waves is crosshatched, indicating two dominant wave trains crossing each other. This pattern of wave propagation in off-wind directions is repeatedly photographed in different locations under different offshore (toward) wind events. The wavelengths of these airborne photographs are in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
