New constraints on the dust and gas distribution in the LkCa 15 disk from ALMA
Sheng Jin, Andrea Isella, Pinghui Huang, Shengtai Li, Hui Li, Jianghui, Ji

TL;DR
This study models the LkCa 15 disk using ALMA data to constrain its gas and dust distribution, revealing a large cavity, a steep density profile, and a discrepancy between gas and dust disk sizes.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed modeling of the LkCa 15 disk’s gas density profile and compares it with dust observations, highlighting dust trapping and drift effects.
Findings
Disk mass estimated at ~0.1 solar masses
Inner cavity radius of 45 AU in gas disk
Outer edge of gas disk at ~600 AU, dust at ~200 AU
Abstract
We search a large parameter space of the LkCa 15's disk density profile to fit its observed radial intensity profile of CO (J = 3-2) obtained from ALMA. The best-fit model within the parameter space has a disk mass of 0.1 (using an abundance ratio of CO/H 1.4 in mass), an inner cavity of 45 AU in radius, an outer edge at 600 AU, and a disk surface density profile follows a power-law of the form . For the disk density profiles that can lead to a small reduced of goodness-of-fit, we find that there is a clear linear correlation between the disk mass and the power-law index in the equation of disk density profile. This suggests that the CO disk of LkCa 15 is optically thick and we can fit its CO radial intensity profile using either a lower disk mass with a smaller or a…
| Parameter | Grids |
|---|---|
| () | [1.0e-4, 3.3e-4, 1.0e-3, 3.3e-3, 1.0e-2, 3.3e-2, 1.0e-1, 3.3e-1] |
| [0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0] | |
| [1, 5, 15, 25, 35, 45, 55, 65] | |
| [2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16] |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
New constraints on the dust and gas distribution in the LkCa 15 disk from ALMA
CAS Key Laboratory of Planetary Sciences, Purple Mountain Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rice University, 6100 Main St., Houston, TX 77005, USA
CAS Key Laboratory of Planetary Sciences, Purple Mountain Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rice University, 6100 Main St., Houston, TX 77005, USA
Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, Peopleʼs Republic of China
Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA
Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA
CAS Key Laboratory of Planetary Sciences, Purple Mountain Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China
(Received March 25, 2019)
Abstract
We search a large parameter space of the LkCa 15’s disk density profile to fit its observed radial intensity profile of 12CO (J = 3-2) obtained from ALMA. The best-fit model within the parameter space has a disk mass of 0.1 (using an abundance ratio of 12CO/H2 1.4 in mass), an inner cavity of 45 AU in radius, an outer edge at 600 AU, and a disk surface density profile follows a power-law of the form . For the disk density profiles that can lead to a small reduced of goodness-of-fit, we find that there is a clear linear correlation between the disk mass and the power-law index in the equation of disk density profile. This suggests that the 12CO disk of LkCa 15 is optically thick and we can fit its 12CO radial intensity profile using either a lower disk mass with a smaller or a higher disk mass with a bigger . By comparing the 12CO channel maps of the best-fit model with disk models with higher or lower masses, we find that a disk mass of 0.1 can best reproduce the observed morphology of the 12CO channel maps. The dust continuum map at 0.87 mm of the LkCa 15 disk shows an inner cavity of the similar size of the best-fit gas model, but its out edge is at 200 AU, much smaller than the fitted gas disk. Such a discrepancy between the outer edges of the gas and dust disks is consistent with dust drifting and trapping models.
stars: individual (LkCa 15) — protoplanetary disks — radiative transfer — submillimeter: planetary systems
††journal: ApJ††software: RADMC-3D v0.41(Dullemond, 2012), CASA ALMA pipeline 5.4.0
1 Introduction
Recently, a large number of protoplanetary disks were spatially resolved by the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) and the Next Generation Very Large Array (ngVLA)(ALMA Partnership et al., 2015; Fedele et al., 2017; Andrews et al., 2018; Isella et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2018). These high-resolution observations of protoplanetary disks in dust continuum and molecular line emissions provide us the morphology of dust and gas distributions in a wide variety of protoplanetary disks. Such information places fundamental constraints for the theoretical studies on dust properties and dust-gas interaction, which is an important building block of planet formation theory (Dong et al., 2015; Isella et al., 2016; Jin et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2018; Dong et al., 2018; Huang et al., 2018; Ricci et al., 2018; Huang et al., 2019).
LkCa 15 is a 2-5 Myr old K5 star with 0.74 and 1.0 (Kenyon & Hartmann, 1995; Simon et al., 2000). It is located in the Taurus-Auriga star-forming region at a distance of 140 pc from the Earth(van den Ancker et al., 1998). LkCa 15 is an interesting target due to its partially dust-depleted disk (Piétu et al., 2006; Espaillat et al., 2007; Thalmann et al., 2010; Andrews et al., 2011; Isella et al., 2012, 2014; Thalmann et al., 2014) and the probability of harboring a planet candidate inside its inner cavity (Kraus & Ireland, 2012; Sallum et al., 2015; Thalmann et al., 2016; Currie et al., 2019). The depleted inner region shown in the dust continuum image is about 50 AU in radius (Piétu et al., 2006; Andrews et al., 2011; Isella et al., 2012, 2014), and it has a mass accretion rate of about (Hartmann et al., 1998). The outer edge of the dust disk inferred from continuum emission is at 150 AU(Piétu et al., 2007; Isella et al., 2012). The dust mass estimated from 1.3 mm continuum observation is about (Isella et al., 2012). Recent images of scattered light suggest a warped inner disk component inside the inner gap, providing a clear picture details of the inner gap region of the LkCa 15 disk (Thalmann et al., 2015, 2016; Oh et al., 2016).
As a young star, LkCa 15 is a luminous source of X-ray and EUV emission(Skinner & Güdel, 2013), indicating that the LkCa 15 disk could still be undergoing the active evolution phase of disk physics and chemistry. Consequently, the protoplanetary disk of LkCa 15 has been found to be especially chemically rich and has been detected in several molecular transitions(Thi et al., 2004; Piétu et al., 2007; Chapillon et al., 2008; Öberg et al., 2010; Punzi et al., 2015). Molecular line emission shows that the gas disk around LkCa 15 is in size of 900 AU(Piétu et al., 2007; Isella et al., 2012). It is highly optically thick in the emission of 12CO, but optically thin in 13CO emission(Punzi et al., 2015; van der Marel et al., 2015). The discrepancy between the outer disk radii shown in the dust continuum and molecular line emissions ( 150 AU versus 900 AU) suggests that the mm-size dust is depleted in the outer part of the LkCa 15 disk, which is in consistence with dust drifting and trapping models(Birnstiel et al., 2010; Pinilla et al., 2012).
Being a protoplanetary disk that may have a young planet candidate, the LkCa 15 system serves as a unique laboratory to study the dust evolution models under planet-disk interaction(Zhu et al., 2011; Pinilla et al., 2012). The distribution of dust and gas in the LkCa 15 disk provides an important constraint on theoretic models. Here, we fit the gas and dust surface density profiles based on the high-resolution dust continuum image and CO 3-2 line maps obtained from the ALMA. We study how the goodness-of-fit changes along with different key parameters used in the disk density profile, which is related with different physics. Our disk model and the parameter grid is described in Section 3. In Section 4, we show the best-fit model with respect to the observed 12CO image. We discuss the dependence of parameters in Section 5.
2 Observation
The LkCa 15 was observed at August 17 and August 29, 2014 with ALMA Band 7 (345 GHz, 880 ) in ALMA program 2012.1.00870.S (PI Pérez, L. M.). The 12CO, 13CO and C18O 3-2 line maps and 0.87 mm dust continuum image were taken with two different tunings. The 12CO 3–2 data were obtained with a spectral window centered on 345.796 GHz, with 1885 channels of 122.06 kHz (0.106 km s*-1*) channel width. The angular resolution of the 12CO image is 0.360.23 (50 AU x 32 AU). The 13CO 3–2 data were centered on 330.588 GHz, with 1967 channels of 122.06 kHz (0.11 km s*-1*) channel width. The angular resolution of the 13CO image is 0.280.21 (40 AU x 30 AU). The C18O 3–2 data were centered on 329.331 GHz, with 1967 channels of 122.06 kHz (0.111 km s*-1*) channel width. The angular resolution of the C18O image is 0.300.23 (41 AU x 32 AU). The dust continuum observation consists of four spectral windows(334.01335.99 GHz, 339.02341.00 GHz, 341.02343.00 GHz, 346.01347.99 GHz). Each spectral window has 64 channels of 31248.22kHz (3527.09 km s*-1*) channel width. The angular resolution of the dust continuum image is 0.230.17 (32 AU x 23 AU).
This is the first comprehensive observation of the CO 3-2 line emission of 12CO, 13CO and C18O in the LkCa 15 disk. Previous observations revealed the line emission of various molecules in the LkCa 15 disk, including the 12CO 6-5(van der Marel et al., 2015), CO 2-1 and HCO+(Qi et al., 2003; Piétu et al., 2007; Punzi et al., 2015), S-bearing molecules(Dutrey et al., 2011), and ethynyl radical (CCH)(Henning et al., 2010). The 12CO 2-1 line emission shows that the LkCa 15 disk is highly optically thick in 12CO(Punzi et al., 2015), and the 12CO 6-5 emission show that gas is still present inside the observed dust cavity(van der Marel et al., 2015). The dust continuum image has also been obtained by several former millimeter observations(Piétu et al., 2006; Espaillat et al., 2007; Isella et al., 2012, 2014), and all these observations show an inner dust cavity of 40-50 AU in size.
2.1 Dust continuum and line maps
Figure 1 shows the dust continuum and the 12CO zero-moment maps of the LkCa 15 system. We will extract an azimuthal averaged flux from these zero-moment maps along the radial direction, and use the derived 12CO radial intensity profile as a reference to judge the goodness-of-fit of our disk models. The dust continuum map shows an inner hole of 65 AU in radius, and the full width at half maximum of this dust cavity is at 40 AU. This is in agreement with previous millimeter observations(Andrews et al., 2011; Isella et al., 2012, 2014). Such a large inner cavity disappears in the zero-moment map of 12CO. For the optically thin 13CO and C18O emissions, the inner disk show an obvious decrease in the azimuthal averaged flux. The zero-moment maps of 12CO, 13CO and C18O are consistent with previous findings that the LkCa 15 disk is optically thick in 12CO emission, while optically thin in 13CO and C18O.
Figure 2 shows the observed channel maps of 12CO, 13CO and C18O of the LkCa 15 disk. The channel maps of 12CO clearly show the near and far halves of a double cone structure, which is the feature resulted from a circular Keplerian rotational disk(Rosenfeld et al., 2013). However, we do not observe such a feature in the channel maps of the optically thin 13CO and C18O due to lower masses of these two isotopes.
3 Modeling
3.1 surface density profile and parameter grid
Our primary goal here is to find a gas disk surface density profile that can best reproduce the observed zero-moment 12CO map. First, we create a parameter space by parameterizing the surface density equation of an analytical disk model. Then, we search the parameter space to obtain the best-fit model that has the least reduced of the radial intensity profile of 12CO emission.
The observed radial intensity profiles of CO isotopes and dust continuum emission in the LkCa 15 disk were obtained by extracting the azimuthal averaged intensity of the zero-moment maps shown in Figure 1. The radial intensity profiles of CO are extended to 600 AU, while the dust continuum emission shows a ring-shape structure and ends at 200 AU. The dust continuum and the CO line emissions cannot be fitted using a single surface density profile. Thus we use two separate equations to describe the surface density profiles of dust and gas in the LkCa 15 disk.
We employ parameterized analytical disk surface density profiles to model the gas and dust in the LkCa 15 disk. For the gas, we adopt a surface density profile that is described by
[TABLE]
which is a simple power-law density profile combined with an inner cavity described by an arctangent function. We turn off the exponential decay term that are typically used to describe the surface density of protoplanetary disks (e.g., Andrews et al., 2009) because the intensity of CO line emissions decrease slowly at larger radii. Moreover, we fix the at 12500 AU to slow down the decrease of the gas density at the outer part of the disk. There are four free parameters in Equation 1: that determines the disk mass, the power-law decay of the surface density in the radial direction, the size of the inner cavity, and the slope of the junction region between the inner cavity and the outer disk. We set up a four-dimensional parameter space of these four free parameters. The parameter grids at each dimension are listed in Table 1.
The dust surface density profile is described by
[TABLE]
Compared with the surface density profile of the gas disk, there is an exponential decay term in the dust density profile to simulate the disappearance of the dust intensity at larger radii. Since we have to subtract the dust continuum emission in generating the 12CO images for all the models in the parameter space listed by Table 1, we adopt a fixed dust density profile of AU, , AU, , and a total dust mass of . These values are determined by fitting the azimuthal averaged radial intensity profile of the observed dust continuum map, and they are used for all the 4096 runs in the parameter space.
3.2 physical model
The first step to derive the 12CO intensity from a specific gas surface density profile is to calculate the three-dimensional disk temperature structure. For each gas surface density profile in the parameter space, We use an iterative approach to obtain a self-consistent three-dimensional disk temperature structure. We assume the disk temperature structure is controlled by micron-size dust particles that are well coupled with gas. Since the vertical distribution of micron-size dust is in turn determined by the disk temperature structure, this is a circular dependency problem. To solve this problem, first we generate an initial three-dimensional micron-size dust distribution, and calculate an initial disk temperature based on this dust distribution. Using the calculated disk temperature, we produce a new micron-size dust distribution by solving the differential equation of hydrostatic equilibrium:
[TABLE]
where is the sound speed. We then run Monte Carlo radiation transfer simulation to calculate a new disk temperature structure using the updated dust distribution. We repeat this process until the three-dimensional disk temperature structure used in generating a dust distribution and the disk temperature structure calculated by the same dust distribution converge (the difference between two temperature structures is within 3% everywhere).
The disk temperature structure and the dust continuum and CO line maps are calculated using the Monte Carlo radiative transfer code RADMC-3D(Dullemond, 2012). We assume the host star of LkCa 15 is a black-body radiator with an effective temperature of 4350 K. The surface density of micron-size dust in the calculation of the disk temperature profile is obtained by a dust-to-gas ratio of 0.001. Compared to the Milky Way average ratio of 0.01 (Bohlin et al., 1978), by setting such a small dust-to-gas ratio we assume that substantial grain growth has occurred in the LkCa 15 disk and the micron-size dust is about 10% in mass of the total dust. Submillimeter and dust continuum observations show that dust grain growth to mm-size particles is completed within less than 1 Myr for the majority of circumstellar disks(Rodmann et al., 2006; Draine, 2006; Ricci et al., 2010a, b, 2011; Ubach et al., 2012), and simulation of dust evolution also shows mm-size dust can form at the age of 1 Myr at high density region in protoplanetary disk(Ormel et al., 2009). As aforementioned, the LkCa 15 disk is about 2-5 Myr in age(Kenyon & Hartmann, 1995; Simon et al., 2000), thus a large fraction of dust can appear to be in large sizes at this stage. The dust opacities used in this work were calculated similar to that of Isella et al. (2009). We assume the dust grains are compact spheres made of astronomical silicates (Weingartner & Draine, 2001), organic carbonates (Zubko et al., 1996), and water ice, with fractional abundances described in Pollack et al. (1994). Single grain opacities were averaged on a grain size distribution to obtain the mean opacity. We adopt a typical MNR power-law size distribution (Mathis et al., 1977), , between a minimum grain size of mm and a maximum grain size of mm. The resulting dust opacity at the wavelength of 1 is cm2 g*-1*.
After we have obtained a self-consistent three-dimensional disk temperature structure, we calculate the dust continuum and 12CO line emission. We interpolate the surface density profile of mm-size dust given by Equation 2 on a three-dimensional spherical grid with a scale height profile of , where 0.1 is a parameter that accounts for the settling of 0.15 millimeter size dust towards the mid-plane. This results in a scale height of 0.75 AU at 100 AU for relatively large dust particles. Such a scale height is consistent with the findings by Pinte et al. (2015). The dust opacity adopted for mm-size dust is calculated using the same model of the opacity for micron-size dust, the only difference is that here the maximum grain size is 1 mm. The resulting dust opacity at the wavelength of 1 mm is 13.2 cm2 g*-1*. We convolve the dust continuum map in each model with the PSF of the ALMA observation and extract an azimuthal averaged radial intensity profile. Then we calculate the reduced for dust continuum emission between the radial intensity profiles of the model and the ALMA observation. For different models in our parameter space, the goodness-of-fit of the dust continuum emission changes due to the variation of disk temperature. But we find that the influence of dust continuum map on the zero-moment 12CO map is limited, because the dust continuum image has a ring-like structure that located at the optically thick region of the 12CO emission.
To calculate the line emission of 12CO, we assume the abundance ratio of 12CO/H2 to be 1.4 in mass, and this value is consistent with the canonical ratio of for the disk initial conditions(Lacy et al., 1994; France et al., 2014). Then we create a three-dimensional density structure of 12CO based on the gas surface density profile of each run by solving the Equation 3. We include the freeze-out effect of CO by setting the number density of 12CO to zero at the region where temperature is below 20 K. Photodissociation by stellar UV and/or X-ray radiation is another important factor as it can destroy the CO in the surface layers of the disk(Visser et al., 2009). We follow the same procedure as in that of Qi et al. (2011) and Rosenfeld et al. (2013), in which we calculate a photodissociation boundary by vertically integrating the H nuclei density to a threshold density of 2.0 . This is a mild threshold compared to the value of 5.0 used in Rosenfeld et al. (2013). We find that it is hard to fit the 12CO intensity beyond 400 AU using a larger photodissociation threshold like 5.0 in H nuclei, because with such a strong photodissociation rate there are little 12CO in the outer disk. The photodissociation threshold turns out to be an alternative free parameter in the fitting of the 12CO radial intensity profile, as it is a critical parameter for the 12CO intensity in the outer disk. In this work, we fix the photodissociation threshold of 2.0 for all the 4096 runs.
We first calculate the self-consistent disk temperature. Then we calculate the dust continuum map and the channel maps of 12CO, and convolve these images with the corresponding ALMA PSFs. Afterwards we subtract the dust continuum map from each channel map, and integrate all the channel maps to generate a zero-moment map of 12CO. Finally, we subtract an azimuthal averaged radial intensity profile from the zero-moment 12CO map and calculate the corresponding reduced of 12CO emission.
In addition, once we obtain the best-fit parameter sets for the 12CO emission, we tentatively adjust the abundance ratio of 12CO/13CO to fit the radial intensity profile of 13CO, using the same disk temperature profile given by the best-fit 12CO model. The observed 13CO radial intensity profile shows a peak at 45 AU, although there is no such a peak in the radial intensity profile of 12CO (the radial intensity profiles of 12CO and 13CO can be found in Section 4). Hence, we have to adopt different abundance ratios of 12CO/13CO for the disk region inside or outside of 45 AU. Although the fitting process of 13CO is not a self-consistent approach, the result can at least be an estimation of the number density of 13CO. We do not model the C18O disk because the signal-to-noise ratio is low and no flux are detected outside of 200 AU.
4 the best-fit model
4.1 12CO intensity profile
The best-fit model in our parameter space has the following parameters: , , AU, and . Although the fitted disk mass is relatively large, it agrees with previous findings(Isella et al., 2012; Huang et al., 2017). Figure 3 shows the gas surface density profile of this best-fit model, which is related to a power-law disk without an exponential decay term usually used in the description of protoplanetary disks (e.g., Andrews et al., 2009). Figure 4 gives the self-consistent temperature structure as calculated by our iterative approach that was described in Section 3.2. It shows a typical two-layer vertical structure of passive irradiated circumstellar disks (Dullemond et al., 2002). In the surface layer, the temperature decreases from 51 K at 100 AU to 29 K at 500 AU. In the mid-plane, the temperature decreases from 15 K at 100 AU to 11 K at 500 AU.
The top panel of Figure 5 compares the azimuthal averaged radial intensity profiles extracted from the zero-moment 12CO maps of our best-fit model with the ALMA observation. The best-fit model results in a reduced of 2.51. Its gas surface density profile has an inner cavity of 45 AU in size. However, we do not see such a cavity in the resulting radial intensity profile, since most of the inner cavity is optically thick in 12CO emission. In fact, for a majority part of the gas density profiles in our parameter space, the inner disk region is optically thick in 12CO emission and its intensity only depends on the calculated disk temperature. Although the very inner part of the disk cavity can become optically thin due to the arctangent function used in the surface density equation, this inner optically thin region did not show up in the radial intensity profile because of the large PSF of the ALMA observation, which is of 50 AU in major axis and 32 AU in minor axis. The observed 12CO intensity decreases slowly in the outer optically thin part of the disk. We find that it is hard to fit the slope of the 12CO radial intensity profile in the entire disk using a simple power-law surface density. Our best-fit model has a large of 4.0. It fits the inner 400 AU very well, but beyond 400 AU it shows lower intensity compared to the ALMA observation. Note that the photodissociation threshold can be another free parameter in our model that can affect the intensity in the outer part of the disk. In order to slow down the decrease of the 12CO intensity beyond 400 AU, we set a photodissociation threshold of 2.0 in H nuclei to keep more 12CO in the outer disk, which is a mild threshold compared to the value of 5.0 used in Rosenfeld et al. (2013). Different photodissociation thresholds will result in different best-fit parameter sets.
In Figure 6 and 7 we show the dust continuum map, the 12CO zero-moment map, and the 12CO channel maps of our best-fit model. Rather than interpolating the Fourier transformation of our model images to the actual observation dataset and cleaning the dataset to get exactly the same PSF of ALMA, we simply convolve a Gaussian function of the same sizes of major and minor axes with the ALMA observation to speed up our fitting process. Thus, compared to Figure 1 and 2, our model images are more smooth than the ALMA observation. For the calculation of reduced , we only use the azimuthal averaged intensity profile. We notice that the channel maps provide important constraints on the goodness of fitting. In the 12CO channel maps shown in Figure 7, we can clearly see the near and far halves of a double cone structure of a Keplerian disk, and the relative angle and magnitude of the near and far halves share similarities with the observed structure shown in Figure 2. These similarities between the channel maps of our best-fit model and the observed channel maps suggest that the mass of LkCa 15 disk is around 0.1 under the assumption that the abundance ratio of 12CO/H2 is 1.4 in mass. The fitting of the outer disk is not good as the disk size is smaller in the channel maps shown in Figure 7, while the observed channel maps in Figure 2 exhibits more extended images. This difficulty is due to the simple power-law surface density profile and the identical radial photodissociation threshold used in our model. We will investigate the effect of different disk masses in Section 5.2. Note that the fitted disk mass depends on the abundance ratio of 12CO/H2 in our model. If we adopt a larger abundance ratio of 12CO/H2 of 3.0 in mass, the fitted mass of the LkCa 15 disk should be around 0.05 .
The bottom panel of Figure 5 compares the azimuthal averaged radial intensity profile of the dust continuum emission of our best-fit model with the ALMA observation. The observation bias for dust continuum image is small, as shown by the small error-bar in the observed radial intensity profile. As a result, the radial intensity profile extracted from the dust continuum image of our best-fit model has a large reduced of 255. But the two intensity profiles of the best-fit model and the ALMA observation generally match. The of dust continuum emission can be largely reduced by further fine tuning the dust surface density profile.
4.2 13CO image
Based on the surface density profile and the temperature structure of the best-fit model of 12CO, we manually adjust the abundance ratio of 12CO/13CO to fit the observed 13CO intensity. This actually exhibits the 13CO emission at the temperature profile given by the gas density profile obtained by the fitting of 12CO, and it is not a self-consistent way as compared to the fitting of 12CO intensity. We adopt this simplified approach only to estimate the mass of 13CO needed to reproduce the observed 13CO image based on the disk properties of the fitted 12CO disk.
We use a power-law function to describe the radius-dependent abundance ratios of 12CO/13CO:
[TABLE]
where is the abundance ratio at , and is the abundance ratio at 45 AU. We separately fit the for the inner and outer disk regions by manually adjusting and . We obtained a of 6360, = -4.0 for the disk region inside of 45 AU, and = 1.7 outside of 45 AU. This leads to 12CO/13CO = 1, 248, and 6360 at 5, 20, and 45 AU, and 12CO/13CO = 1640, 500, 155 and 78 at 100, 200, 400 and 600 AU. Since the in the best-fit 12CO disk is 4, we can infer that the number density profile of 13CO is of the form outside of 45 AU. This could partly explain why it is difficult to fit the 12CO intensity in the outer disk using a surface density profile that is of the form , given that the number density profile fitted from the optically thin 13CO is of . But if we use a surface density profile that is of the form , the fitted disk mass will be around to (see Section 5.1 for details). Such a low mass can not reproduce the morphology of the observed 12CO channel maps as shown in Section 5.2. Thus it is difficult to fit the 12CO intensity in the inner and outer disk regions using a simple power-law radial density profile. Figure 5 shows the radial intensity profile of 13CO compared with the ALMA observation. The reduced of 13CO is derived to be 0.33.
The zero-moment and channel maps of 13CO obtained from the aforementioned fitted abundance ratios are shown in Figure 6 and 7. The fitted zero-moment map of 13CO has an inner cavity, which means the disk becomes optically thin at the wavelengths of 13CO line emissions. The observed zero-moment map of 13CO does not show a distinct inner cavity, but we can see an obvious decrease of the intensity in the inner disk region. For the channel maps, since the mass of 13CO is much lower than the 12CO, we do not see the near and far halves of a double cone structure as shown in the channel maps of 12CO. The morphology of the 13CO channel maps agrees well with the observation.
5 a parameter study
5.1 dependence of parameters
We aim to investigate how the fitting of the 12CO intensity changes with different parameters. For this, we plot in Figure 8 the heat maps of the reduced of the models that have at least two equal parameters with our best-fit model. For example, The top left panel shows the 64 models that have the same and as the best-fit model (marked with a green circle). We see that for the models that have relatively lower reduced , where they show a clear linear correlation between the and . This means that we can find a reasonable fit of the observed 12CO intensity using either a low disk mass with a small or a high disk mass with a large . This relation can be explained as follows. For most of our 4096 models, the inner part of the disk (inside of 300 AU) is optically thick for the line emission of 12CO. As a result, the disk temperature profile determines the observed intensity in the inner part of the disk. Since all 64 runs in this panel have the same and , they will have similar disk temperature structures in the inner part of the disk. Thus the key factor to obtain a good fit for these 64 runs is to derive the right intensity in the outer disk region. This means that in the case of a high mass disk, we only need to reduce the mass at the outer disk region to obtain low intensity there to fit the observed 12CO emission. According to Equation 1, to achieve this point, we can set a large to decrease the disk surface density quickly at large radii. In Figure 5 we also plot the intensity profiles of two disks that has a higher disk mass of of 0.33 or a lower disk mass of 0.033 , as compared to the best-fit model. The intensity profiles of these three models in the inner 100 AU overlap each other. The high-mass model result in a reduced of 14.6, and the low-mass model result in a reduced of 6.7. The difference between three models is the goodness-of-fit at the outer disk region. We will show in Section 5.2 that the goodness of these three models can also be clearly observed in the morphology of the 12CO channel maps.
The top right panel of Figure 8 shows the 64 models that have the same and with our best-fit model. This panel shows that for the disks that have a small inner cavity (with size 10 AU), they cannot reproduce the observed 12CO intensity. Only models that have an inner cavity of 30-60 AU can possibly obtain a small reduced . Furthermore, we can see in the case that the , and are fixed, the goodness-of-fit shows weak correlation to the size of the inner cavity (). On the other hand, when the , and are fixed, the goodness of fitting shows weak correlation to the disk mass, since the 12CO emission is optically thick.
The middle left panel of Figure 8 shows the 64 models that have the same and with the best-fit model. The row with = 4 shows again that the size of the inner cavity plays a less important role in the goodness of fitting. The essential part in the fitting of the 12CO intensity is to find a combination of and that can fit the outer part of the disk. If this goal is achieved, then we can obtain a model that fit the observation, regardless small changes in and .
The middle right panel of Figure 8 shows how the reduced depends on and , i.e., the size of the inner cavity and the slope of the connection region between the inner cavity and outer disk. It confirms that these two parameters have weak effect on the goodness-of-fit of the 12CO intensity. However, there should be a large inner cavity. As it shows that an inner cavity of size 20 AU do not reproduce the observed 12CO intensity.
The bottom two panels of Figure 8 shows how the reduced changes in the versus space and the versus space. The left panel shows that if the is fixed, then the determines the goodness-of-fit. On the contrary, the right panel shows that if the is fixed, the determines the goodness-of-fit. For the , here we see again that it has a very limited effect on the goodness-of-fit. Therefore, we may conclude that the most important part in obtaining a good fit is to find a combination of and .
5.2 Constraint on the disk mass
The best-fit model in our parameter space has a disk mass of 0.1 , a of 4.0, and an inner cavity of 45 AU. We have seen in Section 5.1 that the goodness-of-fit is affected by different combination of parameters, as the top left panel in Figure 8 shows that by adjusting the , we can obtain reasonable fits with higher or lower disk masses. Here we investigate how much our model constrains the mass of the LkCa 15 disk. We choose three models from the top left panel in Figure 8, the best-fit model, a high-mass disk model of 0.33 and a low-mass model of 0.033 (these three models are marked with a green, brown and blue circle respectively). The radial intensity profiles of three models shown in Figure 5, and the high-mass or low-mass model either over-produce or under-produce the intensity out of 100 AU. Since the radial intensity profile is extracted from the zero-moment map that is actually a degenerated image obtained by combining all the channel maps in an actual observation, we expect the difference of these models can also be observed in the channel maps.
In Figure 9 we compare the three models’ channel maps with the ALMA observation, where all the channel maps are plotted in the same colorbar. The most apparent difference between three models is the size of the channel maps. Since we have seen in Figure 5 that the high-mass and low-mass model result in either higher or lower intensity in the outer part of the disk, they either show larger or smaller size in the channel maps compared with the best-fit model. There is another feature that can be used as an effective criteria for the goodness-of-fit of the disk mass, i.e., the morphology of the near and far halves of a double cone structure of a Keplerian disk. For example, in the channel map at the velocity of , the high-mass model shows a too much intense far halve in the double cone structure compared to the observation, while the low-mass model shows a much smaller double cone structure since it under-produce the intensity at the out disk region. In the channel maps at the velocity of and , the two short wings of the double cone structure in the high-mass model are too strong compared to the observation. Thus, the inability of the high-mass and low-mass model in fitting the intensity in the outer disk region also exhibits in the morphology of the double cone structure in the channel maps. They show a double cone structure that is either too strong or too weak compared to the observed channel maps.
The mm-size dust surface density profile that can reproduce the observed dust continuum map is significantly different compared to the fitted gas surface density profile, and this is a reliable result because of the small observational bias of the dust continuum emission. The mm-size dust density profile has a peak at 65 AU, indicating a pressure bump exists at the same location in the gas disk. The full width at half maximum of this dust cavity is at 40 AU, similar as the inner cavity of the fitted gas disk. The mm-size dust disk has an outer edge at 200 AU, which is much smaller compared to the fitted gas disk of 600 AU in size. Such a discrepancy between the gas and dust disks provides an important constraint of the dust drifting models in the LkCa 15 system. Our mm-size dust disk is of 1.0 in mass. According to our dust opacity model, the opacity at mm wavelength is mainly contributed by dust of 0.15 mm is size. This suggests a dust-to-gas ratio of 0.001 for dust of 0.15 mm in size. But this is a weak constraint because we adopt a uniform opacity model for dusts at different distances. In reality, the species and the size distribution of dust should change at different radii, and this will affect the calculated dust opacity and consequently the fitted dust masses at different radii.
6 Conclusions
In this work, we analyze the dust continuum and 12CO 3-2 line emission maps of the LkCa 15 disk that are obtained from ALMA observation. We parameterize an analytical surface density profile of the LkCa 15 disk and search through the parameter space to find the best-fit gas surface density model that leads to the least reduced of the 12CO intensity. Our key findings are summarized as follows:
- The best-fit model of the gas disk based on 12CO 3-2 line emission is a disk of 0.1 in mass. The gas disk has an inner cavity of 45 AU in size, and its outer edge is at 600 AU. The surface density profile of this best-fit model follows a power-law of the form . But such a steep power-law density profile results in lower 12CO intensity at outer part of the disk beyond 400 AU compared to the observation.
2, The dust continuum map can be reproduced by a dust disk which has an inner cavity of 65 AU in size, and the full width at half maximum of this cavity is 40 AU. The size of the dust cavity is similar to the size of the fitted gas cavity. Unlike the gas disk, the mm-size dust disk ends at 200 AU. The discrepancy between the outer edges of the gas and dust disks can be used to study the dust drifting models in the LkCa 15 disk.
3, The heat maps of the reduced of different models show a linear correlation between the and for the models that have a reasonable goodness-of-fit of the radial intensity profile of 12CO. This means that we can fit the observed 12CO intensity using either a lower disk mass with a smaller or higher disk mass with bigger . Because the inner disk region is optically thick, and the key factor to derive a good fit is to adjust the density profile in the outer disk region to obtain consistent intensity there.
4, The morphology of the 12CO channel maps are important constraints of the disk mass. In our parameter space, although there are some models with higher or lower disk masses that can result in a reasonable reduced , their channel maps show a double cone structure that is either too strong or too weak compared to the ALMA observation. The best-fit model with a disk mass of 0.1 can best reproduce the observed channel maps.
This paper makes use of the following ALMA data: ADS/JAO.ALMA#2012.1.00870.S. ALMA is a partnership of ESO (representing its member states), NSF (USA) and NINS (Japan), together with NRC (Canada), MOST and ASIAA (Taiwan), and KASI (Republic of Korea), in cooperation with the Republic of Chile. The Joint ALMA Observatory is operated by ESO, AUI/NRAO and NAOJ. S.J. and J.J. acknowledge support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant Nos. 11503092, 11773081, 11661161013, 11573073, 11633009), the CAS Interdisciplinary Innovation Team, the Strategic Priority Research Program on Space Science, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Grant No. XDA15020302 and the Foundation of Minor Planets of Purple Mountain Observatory. A.I. acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation through grant No. AST-1715719 and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration support from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration through grant No. 80HQTR18T0061 and the Center for Space and Earth Science at LANL. We thank the referee for comments that helped to improve the manuscript.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1ALMA Partnership et al. (2015) ALMA Partnership, Brogan, C. L., Pérez, L. M., et al. 2015, Ap J, 808, L 3
- 2Andrews et al. (2009) Andrews, S. M., Wilner, D. J., Hughes, A. M., Qi, C., & Dullemond, C. P. 2009, Ap J, 700, 1502
- 3Andrews et al. (2011) Andrews, S. M., Rosenfeld, K. A., Wilner, D. J., & Bremer, M. 2011, Ap J, 742, L 5
- 4Andrews et al. (2018) Andrews, S. M., Huang, J., Pérez, L. M., et al. 2018, Ap J, 869, L 41
- 5Birnstiel et al. (2010) Birnstiel, T., Dullemond, C. P., & Brauer, F. 2010, A&A, 513, A 79
- 6Bohlin et al. (1978) Bohlin, R. C., Savage, B. D., & Drake, J. F. 1978, Ap J, 224, 132
- 7Chapillon et al. (2008) Chapillon, E., Guilloteau, S., Dutrey, A., & Piétu, V. 2008, A&A, 488, 565
- 8Currie et al. (2019) Currie, T., Marois, C., Cieza, L., et al. 2019, Ap J, 877, L 3
