Free abelian group actions on normal projective varieties: sub-maximal dynamical rank case
Fei Hu, Sichen Li

TL;DR
This paper investigates the structure of normal projective varieties with abelian automorphism groups of positive entropy, specifically characterizing cases where the group rank is just below the maximum possible, extending previous classifications.
Contribution
The paper provides a characterization of pairs (X, G) where the automorphism group has rank n-2, advancing understanding of sub-maximal dynamical ranks in algebraic geometry.
Findings
Characterization of (X, G) with rank G = n - 2
Extension of known classifications from maximal to sub-maximal rank cases
Insights into the structure of automorphism groups on projective varieties
Abstract
Let be a normal projective variety of dimension and an abelian group of automorphisms such that all elements of are of positive entropy. Dinh and Sibony showed that is actually free abelian of rank . The maximal rank case has been well understood by De-Qi Zhang. We aim to characterize the pair such that .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Free abelian group actions on normal projective varieties: sub-maximal dynamical rank case
Fei Hu
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, Canada Pacific Institute for the Mathematical Sciences, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada [email protected] https://sites.google.com/view/feihu90s/ and
Sichen Li
East China Normal University, 500 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai 200241, China National University of Singapore, 10 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119076
Abstract.
Let be a normal projective variety of dimension and an abelian group of automorphisms such that all elements of are of positive entropy. Dinh and Sibony showed that is actually free abelian of rank . The maximal rank case has been well understood by De-Qi Zhang. We aim to characterize the pair such that .
Key words and phrases:
automorphism, dynamical degree, dynamical rank, topological entropy, Kodaira dimension, weak Calabi–Yau variety, special MRC fibration
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
14J50, 32M05, 32H50, 37B40.
The first author was partially supported by postdoctoral fellowships of the University of British Columbia, the Pacific Institute for the Mathematical Sciences, and the University of Waterloo. The second author was supported by a scholarship of China Scholarship Council.
1. Introduction
We work over the field of complex numbers. Let be a normal projective variety. Denote by the Néron–Severi group of , i.e., the finitely generated abelian group of Cartier divisors on modulo algebraic equivalence. For a field or , we denote by the finite-dimensional -vector space . The first dynamical degree of an automorphism is defined as the spectral radius of its natural pullback on , i.e.,
[TABLE]
We say that is of positive entropy if , otherwise it is of null entropy. For a subgroup of the automorphism group , we define the null-entropy subset of as
[TABLE]
We call of positive entropy (resp. of null entropy), if (resp. ). Indeed, when is smooth and hence is a compact Kähler manifold, our positivity notion of entropy is equivalent to the positivity of topological entropy in complex dynamics by the log-concavity of dynamical degrees and the fundamental work of Gromov [Gro03] and Yomdin [Yom87]. We refer to [DS17, §4] and references therein for a comprehensive exposition on dynamical degrees, topological and algebraic entropies.
In [DS04], Dinh and Sibony proved that for any abelian subgroup of , if is of positive entropy, then is free abelian of rank . This was subsequently extended by De-Qi Zhang [Zha09] to the solvable group case. We are thus interested in algebraic varieties admitting the action of free abelian groups of positive entropy. Therefore, it is meaningful for us to consider the following hypothesis.
Hyp .
is a normal projective variety of dimension and is a subgroup of with , such that is of positive entropy, i.e., all elements of are of positive entropy.
Often, we shall call the above positive integer the dynamical rank of to emphasize that is of positive entropy in the context of dynamics, not just being a free abelian group. See section 2.3 for a more general consideration on dynamical ranks.
In the last years, the maximal dynamical rank case has been intensively studied by De-Qi Zhang in his series papers (see e.g., [Zha09, Zha13, Zha16]), which extend the known surface case [Can99] to higher dimensions. See also [DS04, Ogu07, CZ12, CWZ14, DHZ15, OT15, Les18] for relevant work. We rephrase one of Zhang’s main results as follows.
Theorem 1.1** (cf. [Zha16, Theorems 1.1 and 2.4]).**
Let satisfy Hyp with . Suppose that is not rationally connected, or has only -factorial Kawamata log terminal (klt) singularities and the canonical divisor is pseudo-effective. Then after replacing by a finite-index subgroup, the following assertions hold.
- (1)
There is a birational map such that the induced action of on is biregular, where is an abelian variety and is a finite group whose action on is free outside a finite subset of .
- (2)
The canonical divisor of is -linearly equivalent to zero, i.e., .
- (3)
There is a faithful action of on such that is -equivariant. Every -periodic proper subvariety of or is a point.
Our hypothesis Hyp is nothing but Zhang’s Hyp(sA), which is stronger than his Hyp(A). But the latter is a property preserved by generically finite maps. Note that one of the key ingredients of Zhang’s proof is the existence of certain -equivariant log minimal model program (or rather, LMMP with scaling), where the klt singularity assumption has its significance (see [Zha16, Lemma 3.13]). On the other hand, for ease of exposition, we are blindly using klt singularity other than log terminal singularity, though there is no actual pair but just so that they are actually the same.
The aim of this article is to investigate the sub-maximal dynamical rank case following Nakayama and Zhang’s ideas in [NZ10, Nak10]. Although they only dealt with polarized endomorphisms of normal projective varieties, the machinery developed there is robust so that it could also be adopted in the study of automorphisms. We refer to sections 2.1 and 2.2 for their counterparts. Other ingredients include the product formula of dynamical degrees due to Dinh and Nguyên [DN11] and an inequality about dynamical ranks given by the first author in [Hu] (see Lemma 2.16). Below is our main result.
Theorem 1.2**.**
Let satisfy Hyp with . Then the Kodaira dimension of is at most one. Moreover, after replacing by a finite-index subgroup, we obtain the following partial classification.
- (1)
When , let be a very general fiber of the Iitaka fibration of , where . Then descends to a trivial action on the base curve and acts faithfully on such that is -equivariantly birational to a K3 surface, an Enriques surface, or a Q-abelian variety (see Definition 2.1).
- (2)
When , suppose further that has only klt singularities and . Then there exists a finite cover , étale in codimension one, such that is -equivariantly birational to a weak Calabi–Yau variety (see Definition 2.4), an abelian variety, or a product of a weak Calabi–Yau surface and an abelian variety.
- (3)
When , suppose further that is uniruled. Let be the special MRC fibration of (in the sense of Nakayama; see e.g., Definition 2.10). Then either is rationally connected, or is birational to a curve of genus , a K3 surface, an Enriques surface, or a Q-abelian variety , where is an abelian variety and is a finite group whose action on is free outside a finite subset of . In particular, if , then there exists a finite cover , étale in codimension one, such that the induced rational map is -equivariantly birational to the MRC fibration of .
Remark 1.3*.*
- (1)
In the case , if we merely assume that has only klt singularities, then the good minimal model program predicts the existence of a minimal model of so that . Modulo this, one then has to consider the induced birational (not necessarily biregular) action of on . Note that in the maximal dynamical rank case, Zhang managed to achieve this by proving that certain LMMP with scaling terminates -equivariantly (see [Zha16, Proposition 3.11]). It is not clear to us that in our setting we can still run a similar -equivariant LMMP with scaling. The main obstruction is the absence of a nef and big -divisor as essentially constructed in [DS04], which plays a crucial role in the proof of [Zha16, ibid.]. On the other hand, the induced birational action of on turns out to be isomorphic in codimension one, i.e., is a subgroup of the so-called pseudo-automorphism group of . It is thus more natural to study the dynamical property of a group of pseudo-automorphisms of a general . 2. (2)
For a normal projective variety , the following is well known:
[TABLE]
However, the implication “ is uniruled" is unknown and turns out to be closely related to one of the most important conjectures in birational geometry, namely, the Non-vanishing conjecture (cf. [BCHM10, Conjecture 2.1]; see also [BDPP13, Conjecture 0.1]). This is the reason that we assume to be uniruled in Theorem 1.2(3). 3. (3)
Admittedly, the result of our Theorem 1.2 does not present a complete characterization due to those technical assumptions. However, using the similar idea, we are able to reduce the general positive Kodaira dimension case to the Kodaira dimension zero case; see Remark 3.2 for details.
2. Preliminaries
Throughout this section, unless otherwise stated, is a normal projective variety of dimension defined over .
We refer to Kollár–Mori [KM98] for the standard definitions, notation, and terminologies in birational geometry. For instance, see [KM98, Definitions 2.34 and 5.8] for the definitions of canonical, Kawamata log terminal (klt), rational, and log canonical (lc) singularities.
The Kodaira dimension of a smooth projective variety is defined as the Kodaira–Iitaka dimension of the canonical divisor . The Kodaira dimension of a singular variety is defined to be the Kodaira dimension of any smooth model.
We say that is uniruled, if there is a dominant rational map with . We call rationally connected, in the sense of Campana [Cam92] and Kollár–Miyaoka–Mori [KMM92], if any two general points of can be connected by an irreducible rational curve on ; when is smooth, this is equivalent to saying that any two points of can be connected by an irreducible rational curve (see e.g., [Kol96, IV.3]).
A fundamental result about rationally connected varieties is arguably the existence of the maximal rationally connected fibration (MRC fibration for short) constructed by Campana [Cam92] and Kollár–Miyaoka–Mori [KMM92]. Roughly speaking, for any given variety , there exists a dominant rational map (unique up to birational equivalence) characterized by the following properties:
- •
Rational connectivity: The general fibers of are rationally connected.
- •
Maximality: Almost all rational curves in lie in the fibers. Namely, for a very general point , if is a rational curve on meeting the fiber , then .
The above rational map and the variety are unique up to birational equivalence and are called the MRC fibration and the MRC quotient of , respectively. A deep result due to Graber–Harris–Starr asserts that is non-uniruled (see [GHS03, Corollary 1.4]). Hence, is a point if and only if is rationally connected. The MRC fibration is particularly useful when our variety is uniruled but not rationally connected, since in this situation the MRC fibration is a non-trivial rational fibration (with ). Later, in section 2.2, we will encounter the special MRC fibration constructed by Nakayama [Nak10].
We now give the formal definition of Q-abelian varieties.
Definition 2.1** ([NZ10, Definition 2.13]).**
A normal projective variety is called Q-abelian, if there are an abelian variety and a finite surjective morphism which is étale in codimension one.
In general, given a -action on an algebraic variety , i.e., there is a group homomorphism , we denote by the image of in . The action of on is faithful, if is injective.
Let be a subgroup of the automorphism group of . A rational map is called -equivariant if the -action on descends to a biregular (possibly non-faithful) action on . In other words, for each , there is an automorphism of such that . We hence denote by the image of in .
2.1. Weak decomposition
The famous Bogomolov–Beauville decomposition theorem asserts that for any compact Kähler manifold with numerically trivial canonical bundle, there is a finite étale cover that can be decomposed as a product of a torus, Calabi–Yau manifolds, and irreducible holomorphic symplectic manifolds (see [Bea83]). Recently, this has been very successfully generalized to normal projective varieties with only klt singularities and numerically trivial canonical divisors by Höring and Peternell [HP19], based on the previous significant work by Druel [Dru18], Greb, Guenancia, Kebekus and Peternell [GKP16a, GGK19]. However, in this note, instead of utilizing their strong decomposition theorem, we shall work on a weaker version due to Kawamata [Kaw85] and developed by Nakayama–Zhang [NZ10]; see Remark 3.5 for a brief explanation.
We begin with the definition of the so-called augmented irregularity. Note that the irregularity of normal projective varieties is generally not invariant under étale in codimension one covers.
Definition 2.2** (Augmented irregularity).**
Let be a normal projective variety. The irregularity of is defined by , where stands for the sheaf of rings of regular functions on . The augmented irregularity of is defined as the supremum of of all normal projective varieties with finite surjective morphisms , étale in codimension one. Namely,
[TABLE]
Remark 2.3*.*
- (1)
Let be a normal projective variety with only klt singularities such that . Then . Also, if and only if is an abelian variety. It follows that is Q-abelian if and only if . See [NZ10, Proposition 2.10]. 2. (2)
The augmented irregularity is invariant under étale in codimension one covers. Namely, if is étale in codimension one, then . Clearly, by the definition. On the other hand, by the base change any two étale in codimension one covers of is dominated by a third one so that .
Definition 2.4** (Weak Calabi–Yau variety).**
A normal projective variety is called a weak Calabi–Yau variety, if
- •
has only canonical singularities,
- •
the canonical divisor , and
- •
the augmented irregularity .
Remark 2.5*.*
- (1)
Our notion of weak Calabi–Yau may not be standard in the literature, as often for smooth varieties it only requires the irregularity to be zero. However, our weak Calabi–Yau varieties appear naturally in the singular Bogomolov–Beauville decomposition of klt varieties with numerically trivial canonical divisors (see e.g., [GKP16b, Theorem 1.3]). 2. (2)
Note that a two-dimensional weak Calabi–Yau variety is exactly a normal projective surface with du Val singularities such that its minimal resolution is a K3 surface and that there is no finite surjective morphism from any abelian surface. 3. (3)
It is also worth mentioning that those smooth Calabi–Yau threefolds of quotient type A or K in the sense of [OS01] are, however, not weak Calabi–Yau according to the above definition. See also [GGK19, §14.2]. It is a natural question whether the topological fundamental group of a weak Calabi–Yau variety is finite; one can also ask a similar question for the étale fundamental group of the smooth locus of .
As we do not treat actual pairs, the variety being klt is the same as being log terminal. Henceforth, we do not distinguish them.
Lemma 2.6** (cf. [NZ10, Lemma 2.12]).**
Let be a normal projective variety with only klt singularities such that . Then there exists a finite surjective morphism satisfying the following conditions, uniquely up to isomorphism over :
- (1)
* is étale in codimension one.*
- (2)
.
- (3)
* is Galois.*
- (4)
If is any finite surjective morphism satisfying the conditions (1) and (2), then there exists a finite surjective morphism , étale in codimension one, such that .
The above Galois cover is called the Albanese closure of in codimension one by Nakayama and Zhang; a similar result for smooth projective varieties could be found in [Bea83]. Here, the key point is that the universal property allows one to lift the group action to the Albanese closure.
Lemma 2.7** (cf. [NZ10, Proposition 3.5]).**
Let be a normal projective variety with only klt singularities such that , and an automorphism of . Then there exist a morphism from a normal projective variety , an automorphism of such that the following conditions hold.
- (1)
* is finite surjective and étale in codimension one.*
- (2)
* is isomorphic to the product variety for a weak Calabi–Yau variety (see Definition 2.4) and an abelian variety .*
- (3)
The dimension of equals the augmented irregularity of .
- (4)
There are automorphisms and of and , respectively, such that the following diagram commutes:
[TABLE]
Proof.
For the convenience of the reader, we sketch their proof as follows. First, let us take the global index-one cover , which is a finite surjective morphism and étale in codimension one, such that has only canonical singularities with (see [KM98, Definition 5.19]). The uniqueness of the global index-one cover asserts that the automorphism can be lifted to an automorphism on . So at the expense of replacing by , we may assume that has only canonical singularities with .
Next, let be the Albanese closure of in codimension one, whose existence is guaranteed by Lemma 2.6. It thus follows from the universal property of that we can lift to an automorphism on . More precisely, applying Lemma 2.6(4) to , there exists a finite surjective morphism such that . Clearly, is an automorphism since so is . Therefore, replacing by if necessary, we may assume further that .
Note that the augmented irregularity is invariant under étale in codimension one covers; see e.g., Remark 2.3(2). Hence, the above is indeed equal to the augmented irregularity of the original , even though we have replaced our by new models.
Now, under the above assumptions, the Albanese morphism turns out to be an étale fiber bundle, i.e., there is an isogeny such that , where is a fiber of (see [Kaw85, Theorem 8.3]). Without loss of generality, we may assume that (for otherwise, is a weak Calabi–Yau variety). Clearly, there is an induced automorphism of by the universal property of the Albanese morphism ; denote it by . If , then so that is an abelian variety (isogenous to ); see Remark 2.3(1). We are also done in this case. So, let us assume that . Note that has only canonical singularities with . It is not hard to see that is a weak Calabi–Yau variety. Indeed, if , then by applying the same argument above to , there exists a finite surjective morphism étale in codimension one, where is an abelian variety of dimension . This gives another finite surjective morphism étale in codimension one, from which we have
[TABLE]
a contradiction.
Lastly, take an isogeny further so that is just the multiplication-by- map on for some positive integer . Then there is an automorphism of such that . Consider the new fiber product of and . Let denote the finite étale cover induced from the first projection. Then for the same fiber of as above. It is clear that those automorphisms , and induce an automorphism on satisfying that . Note that as a weak Calabi–Yau variety, is nonruled and has only canonical (and hence rational by [KM98, Theorem 5.22]) singularities, and its augmented irregularity vanishes. It thus follows from Lemma 2.9 below that the induced automorphism of on splits as . In other words, we have the following commutative diagram endowed with equivariant group actions:
[TABLE]
Finally, in view of the Albanese morphism , we see that . ∎
Remark 2.8*.*
- (1)
In the above lemma, by Nakayama’s celebrated result on the Abundance conjecture in the Kodaira dimension zero case (see [Nak04, Corollary V.4.9]), we can replace the condition “" by “". When has only canonical singularities, this was originally due to Kawamata [Kaw85, Theorem 8.2]. 2. (2)
For any subgroup , the action of on extends to a faithful action on , denoted by , which then splits as a subgroup of by the following lemma. Note that the action of on can be identified with a not necessarily faithful action of on (with finite kernel). If which is always the case in this article, we can apply [Zha13, Lemma 2.4] so that a finite-index subgroup of also acts faithfully on .
Below is a simple variant of Nakayama and Zhang’s splitting criterion for automorphisms of certain product varieties.
Lemma 2.9** (cf. [NZ10, Lemma 2.14]).**
Let be a nonruled normal projective variety with only rational singularities, and an abelian variety. Suppose that . Then any automorphism of splits, i.e., there are suitable automorphisms and of and , respectively, such that .
2.2. Special MRC fibration
In this subsection, we collect basic materials on the special MRC fibration introduced by Nakayama [Nak10].
Definition 2.10** (Nakayama).**
Given a projective variety , a dominant rational map is called the special MRC fibration of , if it satisfies the following conditions:
- (1)
The graph of is equidimensional over .
- (2)
The general fibers of are rationally connected.
- (3)
is a non-uniruled normal projective variety (see [GHS03]).
- (4)
If is a dominant rational map satisfying (1)–(3), then there is a birational morphism such that .
The existence and the uniqueness (up to isomorphism) of the special MRC fibration is proved in [Nak10, Theorem 4.18]. One of the crucial advantages of the special MRC is the following descent property (see [Nak10, Theorem 4.19]).
Lemma 2.11**.**
Let be the special MRC fibration, and . Then descends to a biregular action on , denoted by . Moreover, there exist a birational morphism and an equidimensional surjective morphism satisfying the following conditions:
- (1)
* is a normal projective variety.*
- (2)
A general fiber of is rationally connected.
- (3)
Both and are -equivariant.
Proof.
By [Nak10, Theorem 4.19], descends to a biregular action on . We take as the normalization of the graph of which admits a natural faithful -action. Then (2) follows readily from Definition 2.10, while (3) the -equivariance of . ∎
Lemma 2.12** (cf. [NZ10, Lemma 4.4]).**
With notation as in Lemma 2.11, let be a -equivariant finite surjective morphism from a normal projective variety . Then there exist finite surjective morphisms and , a birational morphism , and an equidimensional surjective morphism satisfying the following conditions:
- (1)
Both and are normal projective varieties.
- (2)
A general fiber of is rationally connected.
- (3)
* is -equivariantly birational to the MRC fibration of .*
- (4)
In the commutative diagram below, every morphism or rational map other than is -equivariant.
[TABLE]
Moreover, if is étale in codimension one, then so are and .
Proof.
Let be the normalization of the fiber product . Denote by and the morphisms induced from the first and second projections, respectively. Then is an equidimensional surjective morphism whose general fibers are rationally connected varieties and in particular irreducible, since so is . Here we use the fact that smooth rationally connected varieties are simply connected. This forces to be irreducible and hence is a normal projective variety. Clearly, the -actions on and can be naturally extended to and hence to , which is faithful since acts faithfully on . Note that is non-uniruled since so is . It follows that is -equivariantly birational to the special MRC fibration of by Definition 2.10. Taking the Stein factorization of the composite , we then have a birational morphism and a finite morphism for a normal projective variety such that ; furthermore, the faithful -actions on and also induce a faithful -action on . Since the notion of the MRC fibration is essentially birational in nature, is also -equivariantly birational to the MRC fibration of . So all conditions (1)–(4) have been satisfied.
The last part follows from the fact that being étale is a local property stable under base change. ∎
2.3. Dynamical ranks
In this section, we shall consider the dynamical rank of group actions in a much more general setting. We first recall the following Tits alternative type theorem due to De-Qi Zhang [Zha09].
Theorem 2.13** (cf. [Zha09]).**
Let be a normal projective variety of dimension and a subgroup of . Then one of the following two assertions holds.
- (1)
* contains a subgroup isomorphic to the non-abelian free group .*
- (2)
There is a finite-index subgroup of such that the induced group is solvable and Z-connected. Moreover, the null-entropy subset of is a normal subgroup of and the quotient group is free abelian of rank .
Remark 2.14*.*
In general, the induced group of is called Z-connected if its Zariski closure in is connected with respect to the Zariski topology. Note that being Z-connected is only a technical condition for us to apply the theorem of Lie–Kolchin type for a cone in [KOZ09]. Actually, it is always satisfied by replacing the group with a finite-index subgroup (see e.g., [DHZ15, Remark 3.10]). We will frequently use this fact without mentioning it very precisely.
We also remark that in the second assertion of the above Theorem 2.13, the rank of is independent of the choice of . Hence, it makes sense to think of this as an invariant of . We introduce the following notion of dynamical rank in a much broader sense.
Definition 2.15** (Dynamical rank).**
Let be a normal projective variety of dimension and a subgroup of such that is solvable. Then the rank of the free abelian group is called the dynamical rank of , and denoted by .
As one may have noticed, we suppress the condition “ is Z-connected". This does not affect the well-definedness of our dynamical rank according to Remark 2.14.
Sometimes, we may write to emphasize that it is the dynamical rank of the group acting on . Conventionally, the dynamical rank of a group of null entropy is always zero. We first quote the following result which generalizes [Zha09, Lemma 2.10].
Lemma 2.16** (cf. [Hu, Lemmas 4.1 and 4.3]).**
Let be a -equivariant dominant rational map of normal projective varieties with . Suppose that is solvable. Then so is , and we have
[TABLE]
In particular, only if .
The lemma below asserts that our dynamical rank is actually a birational invariant. See also [Zha16, Lemma 3.1] for a similar treatment.
Lemma 2.17** (cf. [Hu, Lemmas 4.2 and 4.4]).**
Let be a -equivariant generically finite dominant rational map of normal projective varieties. Then after replacing by a finite-index subgroup, is solvable if and only if so is . Moreover, .
3. Proof of Theorem 1.2
The theorem will follow immediately from the following lemmas. Each one will correspond to one assertion of Theorem 1.2.
Lemma 3.1**.**
Let satisfy Hyp with . Suppose that the Kodaira dimension of is positive. Then and there exists a dominant rational fibration for some curve such that after replacing by a finite-index subgroup, the following assertions hold.
- (1)
descends to a trivial action on the base curve of .
- (2)
Let be a very general fiber of . Then the induced -action on is faithful such that the pair satisfies Hyp. Moreover, is -equivariantly birational to a K3 surface, an Enriques surface, or a Q-abelian variety (see Definition 2.1).
Proof.
Let be the Iitaka fibration of with the image of for . It follows from the Deligne–Nakamura–Ueno theorem (see [Uen75, Theorem 14.10]) that descends to a finite group acting on biregularly. Replacing by a finite-index subgroup, which does not change its dynamical rank, we may assume that . Further, replacing and by -equivariant resolutions of singularities of the graph of and of , we may also assume that is a regular morphism and is smooth, since by Lemma 2.17 the new pair still satisfies Hyp. If , i.e., is birational, then again thanks to Lemma 2.17, we have , a contradiction. So we may assume that , which yields that is a non-trivial -equivariant fibration. It thus follows from Lemma 2.16 that
[TABLE]
and hence so that is a curve.
It remains to show the assertion (2). Since acts trivially on the base, acts naturally and regularly on the very general fiber of . For any , let denote the induced automorphism of on . By the product formula (see [DN11, Theorem 1.1]), the first dynamical degree of equals which is larger than if . Therefore, acts faithfully (and also regularly) on so that we can identify with and satisfies Hyp.
Lastly, note that , as a very general fiber of the Iitaka fibration, has Kodaira dimension zero and hence is not rationally connected. Then Zhang’s Theorem 1.1 yields that, up to replacing by a finite-index subgroup, is -equivariantly birational to a Q-abelian variety if or equivalently . On the other hand, if , since it admits an automorphism of positive entropy, it is well known that our is either a K3 surface, an Enriques surface, or an abelian surface (see [Can99, Proposition 1]). ∎
Remark 3.2*.*
Using a similar proof of the above lemma, one can also show the following result. Let satisfy Hyp with . If the Kodaira dimension of is positive, then (this is actually not new; see [Zha09, Lemma 2.11]). Moreover, after replacing by a finite-index subgroup, we may assume that acts trivially on and naturally on the very general fiber of the Iitaka fibration with . Better still, the product formula asserts that for each , the restriction of is of positive entropy since so is . Hence, the -action on is faithful and satisfies Hyp. In summary, we have the following reduction:
[TABLE]
The following lemma partially deals with the Kodaira dimension zero case.
Lemma 3.3**.**
Let satisfy Hyp with . Suppose that has only klt singularities and . Then after replacing by a finite-index subgroup, there exist a finite cover , étale in codimension one, and a faithful -action on such that is -equivariantly birational to one of the following varieties:
- (1)
an abelian variety , where satisfies Hyp;
- (2)
a weak Calabi–Yau variety , where satisfies Hyp;
- (3)
a product of a weak Calabi–Yau surface and an abelian variety , where and satisfy Hyp and Hyp, respectively.
Proof.
It follows from Lemmas 2.7 and 2.8 that there is a finite cover , étale in codimension one, such that for a weak Calabi–Yau variety and an abelian variety of dimension , the augmented irregularity of ; furthermore, the action of on extends to a faithful action of on . Replacing by a finite-index subgroup, we may assume that also acts faithfully on and can be identified with a finite-index subgroup of (cf. [Zha13, Lemma 2.4]). Therefore, after replacing by the above mentioned finite-index subgroup, we may assume that satisfies Hyp by Lemma 2.17 since so does . We hence have the following three cases to analyze.
Case . and hence is an abelian variety. In this case, the pair satisfies Hyp and we just take to be .
Case . and hence is a weak Calabi–Yau variety of dimension . So the pair also satisfies Hyp. We then choose to be .
Case . so that is an actual product with each factor being positive-dimensional. According to Lemma 2.9, we denote by and the induced group actions of on and , respectively; note that both are finitely generated abelian groups. It follows from Lemma 2.16 that and . Applying [DS04, Theorem I] to the pair yields that the null-entropy subgroup of is finite. So, up to replacing and hence by a finite-index subgroup, we may assume that is a free abelian group of positive entropy. Thanks to Lemma 2.17, the same argument applies to the -equivariant resolution of . Thus we can assume that is of positive entropy. In particular, and satisfy Hyp and Hyp, respectively.
If (i.e., ), then is just a weak Calabi–Yau surface . So in this case we take to be .
Let us consider the case when . Recall that as a weak Calabi–Yau variety (see Definition 2.4), is not rationally connected and has only canonical singularities with . So applying Theorem 1.1 to asserts that, up to replacing and hence by a finite-index subgroup, is birational to a Q-abelian variety such that the induced action of on is biregular, where is an abelian variety and is a finite group whose action on is free outside a finite subset of ; moreover, there is a faithful action of on such that is -equivariant. Clearly, the pair satisfies Hyp since so does . Let be the normalization of the fiber product , which inherits a natural faithful -action. Then the induced projection is finite surjective and étale in codimension one. Also, is a -equivariant birational map. This yields that is -equivariantly birational to the abelian variety , while is still étale in codimension one. It is easy to see that also satisfies Hyp. We thus complete the proof of Lemma 3.3. ∎
Remark 3.4*.*
If is smooth, we are able to give a finer characterization as follows. Recall that for a projective manifold with numerically trivial canonical bundle, there exists a unique minimal splitting cover in the sense of Beauville [Bea83, §3], of the form
[TABLE]
where is an abelian variety, the are (simply connected) Calabi–Yau manifolds and the are projective hyper-Kähler manifolds.
As a consequence, any automorphism of extends to and then splits into pieces (up to permutations). More precisely, if is a subgroup of such that is of positive entropy, then there exists a group (the lifting of ) acting faithfully on such that , where is the Galois group of the minimal splitting cover . Replacing by a finite-index subgroup, we may assume that also acts faithfully on (cf. [Zha13, Lemma 2.4]), both and satisfy Hyp; further, the group acting on splits as a subgroup of
[TABLE]
One can use the similar argument as in Lemma 3.3 to show that there are at most two factors. Moreover, it is well-known that (see e.g., [KOZ09, Theorem 4.6]) so that the are K3 surfaces. In summary, the covering space decomposes into a product of abelian varieties, Calabi–Yau manifolds, or K3 surfaces with at most two factors. Clearly, there are seven possibilities/classes.
Remark 3.5*.*
Unfortunately, we are not able to deal with the singular case in an analogous way as in Remark 3.4, though we already have the Bogomolov–Beauville decomposition for minimal models with trivial canonical class due to Höring and Peternell [HP19, Theorem 1.5]. The reason for this is as follows.
Let be a normal projective variety with at most klt singularities such that . Let be a finite cover, étale in codimension one, such that
[TABLE]
where is an abelian variety, the are (singular) Calabi–Yau varieties and the are (singular) irreducible holomorphic symplectic varieties (see [GGK19, Definition 1.3]). Note that a compact Kähler manifold with numerically trivial canonical bundle has an almost abelian (aka abelian-by-finite) fundamental group. This fact is used to conclude the existence of the unique minimal splitting cover in [Bea83, §3] for the smooth case. However, in the general singular setup, as far as we can tell, the finiteness of fundamental groups of Calabi–Yau varieties is still unknown (see e.g., [GGK19, §13]). It is thus not clear to us that we can always lift the automorphisms of to some splitting cover . The failure of the strategy of Remark 3.4 for general singular varieties forces us to work on the weak decomposition as we mentioned earlier at the beginning of section 2.1.
Finally, it remains to consider the negative Kodaira dimension case, where the existence of the so-called special MRC fibration plays a crucial role (see section 2.2, or rather [Nak10, Theorem 4.18]).
Lemma 3.6**.**
Let satisfy Hyp with . Suppose that is uniruled but not rationally connected. Let be the special MRC fibration of . Then one of the following assertions holds.
- (1)
is a curve of genus .
- (2)
is a K3 surface, an Enriques surface, or an abelian surface such that .
- (3)
has dimension at least . Then after replacing by a finite-index subgroup, is birational to a Q-abelian variety such that the induced action of on is biregular, where is an abelian variety and is a finite group acting on freely outside a finite subset of ; moreover, there is a faithful action of on such that the quotient map is -equivariant, and hence by Lemma 2.12 there exists a finite cover , étale in codimension one, such that the induced map is -equivariantly birational to the MRC fibration of .
Proof.
Note that has dimension at least one because is not rationally connected. By Lemma 2.11 or [Nak10, Theorem 4.19], descends to a biregular action on . Since is non-uniruled (see [GHS03]), is a non-trivial -equivariant rational fibration. It follows from Lemma 2.16 that .
Note that is not rationally connected since it is non-uniruled. Therefore, if , then is a curve of genus . If , then is either a K3 surface, an Enriques surface or an abelian surface (see e.g., [Can99, Proposition 1]). If , similar as in the proof of Lemma 3.3, Case 3, up to replacing and hence by a finite-index subgroup, we may assume that satisfies Hyp so that Theorem 1.1 applies to . More precisely, is birational to a Q-abelian variety such that the induced action of on is biregular, where is an abelian variety and is a finite group whose action on is free outside a finite subset of ; moreover, the -action on extends to a faithful action on such that is also -equivariant. Now, by Lemma 2.12, there exist a normal projective variety and a finite cover , étale in codimension one, such that the induced map is -equivariantly birational to the MRC fibration of . ∎
Proof of Theorem 1.2.
It follows from Lemmas 3.1, 3.3 and 3.6. ∎
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank De-Qi Zhang for many stimulating discussions and his helpful comments on an earlier draft. The first author is much obliged to Stéphane Druel, Stefan Kebekus, Thomas Peternell and Chenyang Xu for answering his questions on the finiteness of fundamental groups of singular Calabi–Yau varieties. The authors are also very grateful to the referee for carefully reading the manuscript and for his/her many helpful comments and suggestions.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[BCHM 10] Caucher Birkar, Paolo Cascini, Christopher D. Hacon, and James Mc Kernan, Existence of minimal models for varieties of log general type , J. Amer. Math. Soc. 23 (2010), no. 2, 405–468. MR 2601039 DOI:10.1090/S 0894-0347-09-00649-3 · doi ↗
- 2[BDPP 13] Sébastien Boucksom, Jean-Pierre Demailly, Mihai Păun, and Thomas Peternell, The pseudo-effective cone of a compact Kähler manifold and varieties of negative Kodaira dimension , J. Algebraic Geom. 22 (2013), no. 2, 201–248. MR 3019449 DOI:10.1090/S 1056-3911-2012-00574-8 · doi ↗
- 3[Bea 83] Arnaud Beauville, Some remarks on Kähler manifolds with c 1 = 0 subscript 𝑐 1 0 c_{1}=0 , Classification of algebraic and analytic manifolds (Katata, 1982), Progr. Math., vol. 39, Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA, 1983, pp. 1–26. MR 728605
- 4[Cam 92] Frédéric Campana, Connexité rationnelle des variétés de Fano , Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (4) 25 (1992), no. 5, 539–545. MR 1191735 DOI:10.24033/asens.1658 · doi ↗
- 5[CWZ 14] Frederic Campana, Fei Wang, and De-Qi Zhang, Automorphism groups of positive entropy on projective threefolds , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 366 (2014), no. 3, 1621–1638. MR 3145744 DOI:10.1090/S 0002-9947-2013-05838-2 · doi ↗
- 6[Can 99] Serge Cantat, Dynamique des automorphismes des surfaces projectives complexes , C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 328 (1999), no. 10, 901–906. MR 1689873 DOI:10.1016/S 0764-4442(99)80294-8 · doi ↗
- 7[CZ 12] Serge Cantat and Abdelghani Zeghib, Holomorphic actions, Kummer examples, and Zimmer program , Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4) 45 (2012), no. 3, 447–489. MR 3014483 DOI:10.24033/asens.2170 · doi ↗
- 8[DHZ 15] Tien-Cuong Dinh, Fei Hu, and De-Qi Zhang, Compact Kähler manifolds admitting large solvable groups of automorphisms , Adv. Math. 281 (2015), 333–352. MR 3366842 DOI:10.1016/j.aim.2015.05.002 · doi ↗
