# New hot subdwarf stars identified in Gaia DR2 with LAMOST DR5 spectra -- II

## TL;DR

This study identifies and characterizes 682 hot subdwarf stars using Gaia DR2 data and LAMOST DR5 spectra, revealing new stars and differences in stellar populations compared to globular cluster counterparts.

## Contribution

The paper presents a new method combining Gaia and LAMOST data to efficiently identify and analyze hot subdwarf stars, including 135 newly cataloged objects and insights into their population differences.

## Key findings

- Identified 682 hot subdwarf stars, including 135 new discoveries.
- Detected a He abundance gap in He-sdOB stars, similar to globular cluster EHB stars.
- Found population differences suggesting different origins for field and cluster hot subdwarfs.

## Abstract

388 hot subdwarf stars have been identified by using the Hertzsprung-Russell (HR) diagram built from the second data release (DR2) of the Gaia mission. By analyzing their observed LAMOST spectra, we characterized 186 sdB, 73 He-sdOB, 65 sdOB, 45 sdO, 12 He-sdO and 7 He-sdB stars. The atmospheric parameters of these stars (e.g., T eff , log g, log(nHe/nH)) are obtained by fitting the hydrogen (H) and helium (He) line profiles with synthetic spectra calculated from non-Local Thermodynamic Equilibrium (non-LTE) model atmospheres. Among these stars, we have 135 new identified hot subdwarfs which have not been cataloged before. Although 253 stars appear in the catalog by Geier et al. (2017) , but only 91 of them have atmospheric parameters. Together with the 294 hot subdwarf stars found by Lei et al. (2018), we identified 682 hot subdwarf stars in total by using the Gaia HR-diagram and LAMOST spectra. These results demonstrate the efficiency of our method to combine large surveys to search for hot subdwarf stars. We found a distinct gap in our He-sdOB stars based on their He abundance, which is also presented in extreme horizontal branch (EHB) stars of the globular cluster (GC) {\omega} Cen. The number fraction of the sample size for the two sub-groups is very different between the two counterparts. However, the distinct gap between the H-sdB stars and He-sdOB stars in {\omega} Cen is not visible in our sample. More interestingly, the He-sdB population with the highest He abundance in our sample is completely missing in {\omega} Cen. The discrepancy between our field hot subdwarf stars and the EHB stas in {\omega} Cen indicate different origins for the two counterparts.