
TL;DR
This paper explores the algebraic properties of cover ideals of chordal graphs, providing recursive formulas for their Betti numbers and offering new shellings of the independence complex.
Contribution
It introduces recursive formulas for Betti numbers of cover ideals of chordal graphs and presents a new proof of shellability of the independence complex.
Findings
Betti numbers of cover ideals can be computed recursively
The independence complex of a chordal graph is shellable
New shellings of the independence complex are provided
Abstract
The independence complex of a chordal graph is known to be shellable due to a result of Van Tuyl and Villarreal. This is equivalent to the fact that cover ideal of a chordal graph has linear quotients. We use this result to obtain recursive formulas for the Betti numbers of cover ideals of chordal graphs. Also, we give a new proof of their result which yields different shellings of the independence complex.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
On the cover ideals of chordal graphs
Nursel Erey
Gebze Technical University
Department of Mathematics
41400 Kocaeli
Turkey
Abstract.
The independence complex of a chordal graph is known to be shellable due to a result of Van Tuyl and Villarreal [11]. This is equivalent to the fact that cover ideal of a chordal graph has linear quotients. We use this result to obtain recursive formulas for the Betti numbers of cover ideals of chordal graphs. Also, we give a new proof of their result which yields different shellings of the independence complex.
Key words and phrases:
chordal graph, cover ideal, shellable, linear quotients, Betti numbers
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
13D02, 13F55, 05C25, 05E40
Research supported by TÜBİTAK grant no 118C033
1. Introduction
Let be a finite simple graph with the vertex set and let denote the polynomial ring over some field . The edge ideal of , denoted by , is a quadratic squarefree monomial ideal generated by where is an edge of . The cover ideal of is defined by
[TABLE]
Edge and cover ideals have been extensively studied in the literature. The class of chordal graphs arose particularly in the study of such ideals. For instance, according to a celebrated result of Fröberg [3] the edge ideal of a chordal graph has a linear minimal free resolution if and only if its complement graph is chordal. The authors of [4] obtained recursive formulas for the Betti numbers of edge ideals of chordal graphs and characterized chordal graphs whose edge ideals have linear minimal free resolutions. Such recursive formulas were also used in [7] to relate Betti sequences of edge ideals of chordal graphs to -vectors of simplicial complexes.
Francisco and Van Tuyl [2] proved that if is a chordal graph, then is sequentially Cohen-Macaulay. Van Tuyl and Villarreal [11] proved the stronger result that chordal graphs have shellable independence complexes which is equivalent to the statement that cover ideals of chordal graphs have linear quotients. We use this result to obtain recursive formulas for the Betti numbers of cover ideals of chordal graphs which are analogous to those in [4]. As an application of this recursive formula we show that the regularity of the edge ideal of a chordal graph is one more than the induced matching number of the graph (which was originally proved in [13] and recovered by other authors [4, 8, 12]). For some family of chordal graphs (Section 4.1) our recursive procedure gives exact formulas for the Betti numbers.
In Section 3 we recover the result that has linear quotients when is chordal and, our proof is based on improving the arguments in [2]. This yields different shellings of the independence complex than those in [11].
2. Definitions and Notations
Let be a finite simple graph. We call two vertices and neighbors if they are adjacent. The neighborhood of , denoted by , is the set of all neighbors of . The closed neighborhood of , denoted by , is . A complete graph (or clique) on vertices is denoted by .
For any the graph stands for the subgraph obtained from by removing the vertices in .
A graph is chordal if it has no induced cycles of length greater than . A simplicial elimination ordering in a graph is an ordering of the vertices of the graph such that, for each vertex , and the neighbors of that come after in the order induce a clique. Due to a well-known result of Dirac [1] a graph is chordal if and only if it has a simplicial elimination ordering.
A matching of is a set of pairwise disjoint edges of . A matching is called induced matching if is not an edge of whenever , and . The induced matching number of , denoted by , is the maximum cardinality of an induced matching of .
A vertex cover of is a set of vertices such that for every edge . A vertex cover is called minimal if no proper subset of it is a vertex cover. We will denote the set of **minimal vertex covers **of by . If has no edges, then we set . An independent set of is a set vertices which contains no edges. We call an independent set maximal if it cannot be extended to a bigger independent set.
Given a simplicial complex , the dimension of a face is . The dimension of , denoted by , is the maximum dimension of all its faces. A maximal face of is called a facet. A free vertex of is a vertex that belongs to exactly one facet of . Independence complex of a graph , denoted by , is a simplicial complex whose facets are maximal independent sets of . The clique complex of denoted by , is a simplicial complex whose faces correspond to cliques of .
A simplicial complex is called shellable if there exists an order on the facets of such that for all , there exists a vertex and some with . In such case, we call the order a shelling of .
Let be a graph with the vertex set and let for some field . The edge ideal of , denoted by , is defined by
[TABLE]
The cover ideal of , denoted by , is defined by
[TABLE]
Graded Betti numbers of a monomial ideal are denoted by . The projective dimension of is defined by
[TABLE]
and the regularity of is defined by
[TABLE]
For further details on these definitions the readers can refer to [5]. A monomial ideal is said to have linear quotients if there is an ordering on the minimal monomial generators of such that for every the ideal is generated by a subset of . In such case we say is a linear quotients ordering.
To simplify the notation we will use sets of vertices with monomials interchangeably. A squarefree monomial will substitute for the set . Similarly, a set of vertices will substitute for the monomial .
3. Shellings of independence complex of a chordal graph
The complement of an independent set of a graph is a vertex cover. Therefore,
[TABLE]
Observe that is a shelling of if and only if is a linear quotients ordering for . Van Tuyl and Villarreal [11] proved that independence complex of a chordal graph is shellable [11, Theorem 2.13]. Analyzing inductive argument of their proof, one can deduce the following result.
Theorem 3.1**.**
[11]** Let be a chordal graph with a vertex such that induces a clique for some . For each , let and . Suppose that for each , is a linear quotients ordering for . Then
[TABLE]
is a linear quotients ordering for . Note here that if has no edges, then the sequence is just .
Proposition 3.2**.**
Let be a complete graph on at least vertices. Then has linear quotients with respect to any ordering of its minimal generators and thus has a linear resolution. Moreover, , and .
Proof.
Observe that is generated in degree and then the given formulas follow from Theorem 4.1. ∎
Lemma 3.3**.**
Let be a chordal graph with a vertex such that induces a clique for some . Let , and . Then
[TABLE]
Proof.
First observe that the equality holds if has no neighbors or is the only vertex of as we set for a graph with no edges. So, let us assume that .
(): Let be a minimal vertex cover of . First observe that since is a complete subgraph, contains at least vertices of . On the other hand, cannot contain all of the vertices of as it would make redundant in the cover. Therefore, contains exactly vertices of . We consider cases:
Case 1: Suppose . Then as cannot contain all the vertices of . Then is a minimal vertex cover of .
Case 2: Suppose . Then . Observe that must be a minimal vertex cover of .
(): One can show that every minimal vertex cover of can be extended to that of by adding the neighbors of . Similarly, every minimal vertex cover of can be extended to that of by adding provided is not contained in . ∎
Francisco and Van Tuyl [2] proved that the cover ideal of a chordal graph is componentwise linear. Their proof is based on showing that the ideal generated by all degree elements of has linear quotients for all . We improve their arguments by dealing with the minimal generators of instead of those of and recover the following result.
Theorem 3.4**.**
[11]** If is a chordal graph, then has linear quotients.
Proof.
We proceed by induction on the number of vertices of . We may assume that is not complete since otherwise the result follows from Proposition 3.2. Let be a vertex of with such that the induced subgraph on is complete. Let and .
Let be the minimal generators of and let be the minimal generators of both written in the linear quotients ordering.
Let be the minimal vertex covers of which do not contain where . By Lemma 3.3
[TABLE]
are the minimal generators of where . We claim that the list above is a linear quotients ordering. By induction assumption is generated by variables for . Without loss of generality, suppose that . First, we claim that
[TABLE]
Observe that is a vertex cover of . Then for some and we get .
Let be fixed. We will show that is generated by variables. Suppose that for some . From the argument above we get
[TABLE]
Let be fixed. Suppose that has at least two vertices. By induction assumption, there exists such that for some . If , then is a generator of . Let us assume that . Then and . ∎
The inductive proof of the theorem above describes how to construct linear quotients ordering recursively using subgraphs.
Corollary 3.5**.**
Suppose is a chordal graph and is a vertex of such that induces a clique on at least vertices. Let be the minimal generators of and let be the minimal generators of both written in the linear quotients ordering. Let be the generators which do not contain where . Then
[TABLE]
is a linear quotients ordering for .
Example 3.6** (Comparison of shellings).**
Let be the graph in Figure 1. Then induces a clique on vertices. Then , and where in each case the generators are listed in a linear quotients ordering. According to Theorem 3.1 if we take the neighbors of in the order we get the linear quotients ordering
[TABLE]
of . And, this gives the shelling of . Similarly, if we take the neighbors of in the order we get the linear quotients ordering
[TABLE]
of which gives the shelling of .
Now let us construct a linear quotients ordering using Corollary 3.5. Observe that with generators listed in a linear quotients ordering. The generator is the only minimal vertex cover of that contains . Therefore the list
[TABLE]
is a linear quotients ordering for which corresponds to the shelling , , , , , , , of .
4. Recursive computation of Betti numbers
In this section we will find some recursive formulas for Betti numbers of cover ideals of chordal graphs. We will need the following theorem which describes Betti numbers of ideals with linear quotients.
Theorem 4.1**.**
[9, Corollary 2.7]** Let be a homogeneous ideal with linear quotients with respect to where is a minimal system of homogeneous generators for . Let be the minimal number of homogeneous generators of for . Then
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Theorem 4.2** (Recursive formula for graded Betti numbers).**
Let be a chordal graph with a vertex such that induces a clique. Let be the graph obtained from by removing the closed neighborhood of . Then for all
[TABLE]
where if has no edges we set and when .
Proof.
Suppose that for each , the ideal has linear quotients with respect to the order of its minimal generators. Then
[TABLE]
is a linear quotients ordering for by Theorem 3.1. Clearly, for all
[TABLE]
Also, for every , any minimal vertex cover of can be extended to that of by adding some neighbors of since . Therefore if for some and , then we have
[TABLE]
Let be the minimal number of homogeneous generators of for all . Also, for every and let be the minimal number of homogeneous generators of . Then using Theorem 4.1 we have
[TABLE]
as desired. ∎
Theorem 4.3** (Recursive formula for total Betti numbers).**
Let be a chordal graph with a vertex such that induces a clique. Let be the graph obtained from by removing the closed neighborhood of . Then for all ,
[TABLE]
where if has no edges we set and for any .
Proof.
Let be as in the proof of Theorem 4.2. Let be the minimal number of homogeneous generators of for all . Also, for every and let be the minimal number of homogeneous generators of . Then using Theorem 4.1 we have the following equation.
[TABLE]
as desired. ∎
We can apply the theorem above to the path graphs which form a subclass of chordal graphs.
Corollary 4.4**.**
Let denote a path on vertices for . Then for every
[TABLE]
Proof.
Let be the edges of . Then induces a clique on vertices. As and , the result follows immediately. ∎
Remark 4.5**.**
For any path on vertices, the Betti number is the number of minimal vertex covers of of . By Theorem 3.1 for any we have the recursive formula
[TABLE]
For any the sequence defined by the recurrence relation
[TABLE]
is known as the Padovan sequence. Therefore the sequence of Betti numbers coincides with the sequence .
Due to a well known result of Terai [10] regularity of a squarefree monomial ideal is related to the projective dimension of its Alexander dual.
Theorem 4.6**.**
[10]** Let be a squarefree monomial ideal. Then
[TABLE]
As another consequence of Theorem 4.3 we obtain a new proof of the following result.
Corollary 4.7**.**
[4, 8, 12, 13]** If is a chordal graph, then
- (1)
, 2. (2)
.
Proof.
By Theorem 4.6 it suffices to prove (1) as . We proceed by induction on the number of vertices of the graph. First note that the result is clear if has no edges. Also, we may assume that has no isolated vertices as they do not affect the cover ideal. So, let us assume that has a vertex such that induces a clique for some . Let
[TABLE]
where are as in the statement of the Theorem 4.3. By induction assumption and Theorem 4.3 it suffices to show that . It is clear that since is an induced subgraph of . Also, any induced matching of where can be extended to an induced matching of by adding the edge . Therefore, .
Conversely, let be an induced matching of of maximum cardinality. If there exists an edge such that for some , then removing from yields an induced matching for and, . Otherwise, is an induced matching of and . Thus in both cases . ∎
4.1. Unmixed chordal graphs with -dimensional independence complexes
In this section, we demonstrate our recursive formulas on some unmixed chordal graphs. We will use the following characterization of unmixed chordal graphs due to Herzog et al.[6].
Theorem 4.8**.**
[6, Theorem 2.1]** Let be a field, and let be a chordal graph on the vertex set . Let be the facets of which admit a free vertex. Then the following conditions are equivalent:
- •
* is Cohen-Macaulay;*
- •
* is Cohen-Macaulay over ;*
- •
* is unmixed;*
- •
* is the disjoint union of .*
Remark 4.9**.**
For any graph , the number of minimal vertex covers is equal to the number of maximal independent sets. Therefore, is the number of facets of .
Proposition 4.10**.**
Let be an unmixed chordal graph on vertices such that the independence complex of has dimension . Then
[TABLE]
Proof.
Let be the facets of which admit a free vertex. By Theorem 4.8 the vertex set of is the disjoint union of . As has dimension one, . Let and where is a free vertex. For each let . Observe that by Remark 4.9
[TABLE]
Using Theorem 4.3, Proposition 3.2 and Eq.4.3 we get
[TABLE]
Similarly,
[TABLE]
∎
It would be an interesting problem to extend Proposition 4.10 to unmixed chordal graphs with higher dimensional independence complexes. More generally, characterizing Betti numbers of cover ideals of chordal graphs would be of interest.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] G. A. Dirac, On rigid circuit graphs , Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg 38 (1961) 71–76.
- 2[2] C. Francisco, A. Van Tuyl, Sequentially Cohen-Macaulay edge ideals , Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 135 (2007), no. 8, 2327–2337.
- 3[3] R. Fröberg, On Stanley-Reisner rings , Topics in algebra, Part 2 (Warsaw, 1988), 57–70, Banach Center Publ., 26, Part 2, PWN, Warsaw, 1990.
- 4[4] H.T. Hà, A. Van Tuyl, Monomial ideals, edge ideals of hypergraphs, and their graded Betti numbers , J. Algebraic Combin. 27 (2008) 215–245.
- 5[5] J. Herzog, T. Hibi, Monomial ideals , Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 260. Springer-Verlag London, Ltd., London, 2011.
- 6[6] J. Herzog, T. Hibi, X. Zheng, Cohen-Macaulay chordal graphs , J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 113 (2006), no. 5, 911–916.
- 7[7] T. Hibi, K. Kimura, S. Murai, Betti numbers of chordal graphs and f 𝑓 f -vectors of simplicial complexes , J. Algebra 323 (2010), no. 6, 1678–1689.
- 8[8] K. Kimura, Non-Vanishingness of Betti Numbers of Edge Ideals , Harmony of Gröbner bases and the modern industrial society, 153–168, World Sci. Publ., Hackensack, NJ, 2012. (2000), 282–294.
