# The single-jet inclusive cross-section and its definition

**Authors:** Matteo Cacciari, Stefano Forte, Davide Napoletano, Gregory Soyez,, Giovanni Stagnitto

arXiv: 1906.11850 · 2019-12-18

## TL;DR

This paper examines issues with the single-jet inclusive cross-section, proposing alternative definitions to address non-unitarity and perturbative instability, and analyzing their implications for theoretical calculations.

## Contribution

It introduces and analyzes alternative weighted definitions of the jet cross-section that restore unitarity and explores their impact on perturbative stability.

## Key findings

- Standard definition's instability is due to small NLO K factor at certain jet radii.
- Non-unitarity is necessary for canceling logs of the momentum cutoff.
- Alternative definitions do not improve perturbative properties and lack cancellation of large logs.

## Abstract

We investigate some well-known problematic aspects of the single-jet inclusive cross-section, specifically its non-unitarity and the possibly related issue of apparent perturbative instability at low orders. We study and clarify their origin by introducing possible alternative weighted definitions of the observable which restore unitarity. We show that the perturbative instability of the standard definition is an accidental artefact of the smallness of the NLO $K$ factor which only manifests itself for values of the jet radius in the range $R\sim 0.3-0.6$, and that its non-unitarity is necessary in order to ensure cancellation of logs of the momentum cutoff used in the jet definition. We also show that alternative unitary definitions do not have better perturbative properties compared to the conventional non-unitary definition, while suffering from lack of cancellation of large logs.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.11850/full.md

## Figures

26 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.11850/full.md

## References

15 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.11850/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.11850