Fano weighted complete intersections of large codimension
Victor Przyjalkowski, Constantin Shramov

TL;DR
This paper classifies smooth Fano weighted complete intersections with large codimension, advancing understanding of their structure and properties in algebraic geometry.
Contribution
It provides a classification of smooth Fano weighted complete intersections specifically in the case of large codimension, a previously less understood area.
Findings
Complete classification achieved for large codimension cases.
Identification of key properties characterizing these intersections.
New insights into the structure of Fano varieties.
Abstract
We classify smooth Fano weighted complete intersections of large codimension.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCommutative Algebra and Its Applications · Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
Fano weighted complete intersections of large codimension
Victor Przyjalkowski and Constantin Shramov
Victor Przyjalkowski
Steklov Mathematical Institute of RAS, 8 Gubkina street, Moscow 119991, Russia.
[email protected], [email protected]
Constantin Shramov
Steklov Mathematical Institute of RAS, 8 Gubkina street, Moscow 119991, Russia.
Abstract.
We classify smooth Fano weighted complete intersections of large codimension.
Victor Przyjalkowski was supported by grant MD–30.2020.1. Constantin Shramov was supported by the Foundation for the Advancement of Theoretical Physics and Mathematics “BASIS”. Both authors are Young Russian Mathematics award winners and would like to thank its sponsors and jury.
1. Introduction
Given a smooth Fano variety over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, we denote by the Fano index of , that is, the maximal positive integer such that the canonical class is divisible by in the Picard group of . It is well known that , see [IP99, Corollary 3.1.15]. The goal of this note is to prove the following (we refer the reader to [Do82] and [IF00], or to §2 below, for the relevant definitions).
Theorem 1.1**.**
Let be a smooth well formed Fano weighted complete intersection of dimension and codimension that is not an intersection with a linear cone. The following assertions hold.
- (i)
One has .
- (ii)
If , then is a complete intersection of quadrics in .
- (iii)
Suppose that (so that in particular ). Then is a complete intersection of quadrics and a cubic in .
Note that the assumption that in Theorem 1.1 is well formed, as well as the assumption that is not an intersection with a linear cone, can be omitted provided that is sufficiently general and , see Proposition 2.9 below.
We are grateful to M. Ovcharenko who found a mistake in the first version of our paper.
2. Preliminaries
Let be positive integers. Consider the graded algebra , where the grading is defined by assigning the weights to the variables . Put
[TABLE]
The weighted projective space is said to be well formed if the greatest common divisor of any of the weights is . Every weighted projective space is isomorphic to a well formed one, see [Do82, 1.3.1]. A subvariety is said to be well formed if is well formed and
[TABLE]
where the dimension of the empty set is defined to be .
We say that a subvariety of codimension is a weighted complete intersection of multidegree if its weighted homogeneous ideal in is generated by a regular sequence of homogeneous elements of degrees . Note that can be thought of as a weighted complete intersection of codimension [math] in itself.
Theorem 2.1** (see [Di86, Proposition 8]).**
Let be a well formed weighted complete intersection. Then
[TABLE]
The following property is an analog of smoothness for subvarieties in a weighted projective space.
Definition 2.2** (see [IF00, Definition 6.3]).**
Let be the natural projection to the weighted projective space. A subvariety is called quasi-smooth if the preimage is smooth.
Lemma 2.3**.**
Let be a weighted complete intersection. Then is isomorphic to a weighted complete intersection of the same codimension in a well formed weighted projective space . Moreover, if is quasi-smooth, is also quasi-smooth, and if is a general weighted complete intersection of the corresponding multidegree in , then is also a general weighted complete intersection of the corresponding multidegree in .
Proof.
We may assume that the greatest common divisor of the weights equals . Suppose that is not well formed. This means that, up to renumbering, one has , where for , and . Then, if we put , we get an isomorphism given by the -th Veronese map, see, for instance, [IF00, Lemma 5.7]. The image of under this isomorphism is a weighted complete intersection . Indeed, by homogenicity divides all degrees of the variable in the equations defining , so equations that define are given from ones that define by replacing by and by , , where and are weighted homogeneous coordinates on and of weights and , respectively. Repeating this procedure sufficiently many times, we may assume that is well formed.
The affine cone over is a quotient of the affine cone over by a group generated by quasi-reflections, so is quasi-smooth if and only if is quasi-smooth. The assertion about the generality of is obvious. ∎
Although quasi-smoothness is a natural condition to consider, we will be mostly interested in weighted complete intersections that are smooth in the usual sense.
Remark 2.4* ([PSh16, Corollary 2.14]).*
Let be a smooth well formed weighted complete intersection. Then is quasi-smooth.
The following lemma provides a smoothness criterion for weighted complete intersections.
Lemma 2.5** ([PSh16, Lemma 2.5]).**
Let be a smooth well formed weighted complete intersection of multidegree . Then for every and every choice of weights , , such that their greatest common divisor is greater than , there exist degrees , , such that their greatest common divisor is divisible by .
The following definition describes weighted complete intersections that are to a certain extent analogous to complete intersections in a usual projective space that are contained in a hyperplane.
Definition 2.6** (cf. [IF00, Definition 6.5]).**
A weighted complete intersection is said to be an intersection with a linear cone if one has for some and .
Theorem 2.7** (see [IF00, Theorem 6.17]).**
Let be a quasi-smooth weighted complete intersection of dimension at least . Suppose that is well formed and is not an intersection with a linear cone, and that is general in the family of weighted complete intersections of the same multidegree in . Then is well formed.
Remark 2.8*.*
Theorem 2.7 does not hold in dimensions less than . A counterexample is a hypersurface of degree in , which is smooth and quasi-smooth, but not well formed, see [IF00, 6.15(ii)].
The following result shows that a general enough quasi-smooth weighted complete intersection is isomorphic to a weighted complete intersection with nice properties.
Proposition 2.9**.**
Let be a quasi-smooth weighted complete intersection of dimension at least . Assume that is general in the family of weighted complete intersections of the same multidegree in . Then there exists a quasi-smooth well formed weighted complete intersection isomorphic to which is not an intersection with a linear cone.
Proof.
Suppose that is an intersection with a linear cone. Let be the multidegree of . We may assume that . Let , , be a weighted homogeneous coordinate of weight on . Since is general in the family of weighted complete intersections of the same multidegree in , there exists a homogeneous polynomial of degree in the weighted homogeneous ideal of of the form , where the polynomial depends only on variables . Moreover, substituting instead of into the remaining polynomials that generate the ideal of , one can assume that these polynomials do not depend on . Thus the natural projection
[TABLE]
induces the isomorphism of with a weighted complete intersection of multidegree in . Quasi-smoothness of means that the Jacobian matrix of the polynomials defining is non-degenerate. Since the variable appears linearly and only in , quasi-smoothness of implies that is quasi-smooth as well. By the assumption on the generality of , we conclude that is a general weighted complete intersection of multidegree in .
Repeating the above procedure sufficiently many times, we may assume that is not an intersection with a linear cone. Applying Lemma 2.3, we may assume that is a quasi-smooth weighted complete intersection in a well formed weighted projective space; however, as a result of the application of Lemma 2.3, it may become an intersection with a linear cone again. Alternating these two steps, we will finally arrive to a quasi-smooth weighted complete intersection in a well formed weighted projective space that is not an intersection with a linear cone, because projection (2.1) decreases the dimension of the ambient weighted projective space, while the application of Lemma 2.3 leaves it the same. It remains to apply Theorem 2.7 to conclude that is well formed. ∎
If a weighted complete intersection is smooth and well formed, then is quasi-smooth by Remark 2.4. However a priori we cannot assume smoothness instead of quasi-smoothness in Proposition 2.9 since is not necessarily well formed.
Question 2.10**.**
Does Proposition 2.9 nevertheless hold if we replace quasi-smoothness by smoothness?
3. Proof of the main result
In this section we prove Theorem 1.1. By we will always denote the weighted projective space . We will say that a weighted complete intersection of multidegree is normalized if the inequalities and hold. Recall that if is a smooth well formed Fano weighted complete intersection of multidegree and dimension at least , then , see [PSh19, Corollary 2.8]. Note that in a more general situation the following version of adjunction formula holds.
Theorem 3.1** (see [Do82, Theorem 3.3.4], [IF00, 6.14]).**
Let be a quasi-smooth well formed weighted complete intersection. Let be the dualizing sheaf on . Then
[TABLE]
In particular, Theorem 3.1 shows that if is a quasi-smooth well formed weighted complete intersection of arbitrary dimension, then is Fano if and only if .
In the proof of Theorem 1.1 we will use the following auxiliary results.
Theorem 3.2** (see [PST17, Theorem 1.2]).**
Suppose that is a normalized smooth well formed Fano or Calabi–Yau weighted complete intersection of codimension that is not an intersection with a linear cone. Then . Moreover, a general element of the linear system is smooth.
The following result is implicitly contained in [PST17]. We prove it for the reader’s convenience.
Lemma 3.3**.**
Suppose that is a normalized smooth well formed Fano weighted complete intersection of dimension multidegree that is not an intersection with a linear cone. Let be a general element of the linear system . Then is a well formed weighted complete intersection of multidegree in .
Proof.
By the classification of one-dimensional smooth well formed Fano weighted complete intersections (see for instance [PSh19, Lemma 2.6]), we may assume that .
The linear system is non-empty by Theorem 3.2, and every element of is cut out on by a weighted hypersurface of degree in (see, for instance, [PSh19, Corollary 3.3]). Therefore, one can consider as a weighted complete intersection of multidegree in .
Suppose that the weighted projective space is not well formed. Then there are numbers among such that their greatest common divisor is at least . We may assume that these are . Let be the weighted homogeneous coordinate of weight on , and let be the subset given by . Then . Since , the intersection is not empty. On the other hand, by [IF00, 5.15] the weighted projective space is singular along , and by Theorem 2.1 the weighted complete intersection is singular along . The obtained contradiction shows that is well formed.
By [IF00, 5.15] one has . On the other hand, since is smooth and well formed, it is disjoint from by Theorem 2.1. Hence is disjoint from , and thus also from , which implies that is well formed. ∎
Corollary 3.4**.**
Suppose that is a normalized smooth well formed Fano or Calabi–Yau weighted complete intersection of codimension that is not an intersection with a linear cone. Then .
Proof.
If is Calabi–Yau, the assertion follows from Theorem 3.2. Thus, we assume that is Fano. Let . By [PSh19, Lemma 2.6], we may assume that . Furthermore, by [PSh19, Corollary 3.8(i),(ii)], we may assume that .
Applying Theorem 3.2 consecutively times and keeping in mind that a general element of is well formed by Lemma 3.3, we see that , and there exists a normalized smooth well formed Calabi–Yau weighted complete intersection of codimension in , cf. Theorem 3.1. Also, the obtained weighted complete intersection is not an intersection with a linear cone. It remains to apply Theorem 3.2 once again to conclude that . ∎
Theorem 3.5** ([IF00, Lemma 18.4]).**
Suppose that is a normalized quasi-smooth well formed weighted complete intersection of multidegree that is not an intersection with a linear cone. Then for all .
Lemma 3.6** (see [CCC11, Proposition 3.1(1)]).**
Suppose that is a normalized quasi-smooth well formed weighted complete intersection of multidegree that is not an intersection with a linear cone. Then .
The following is a particular case of Theorem 1.1.
Lemma 3.7** (cf. [CCC11, Proof of Theorem 1.3]).**
Suppose that is a smooth well formed Fano weighted complete intersection of dimension and codimension that is not an intersection with a linear cone. Then . Moreover, if , then is a complete intersection of quadrics in .
Proof.
We may assume that is normalized. Suppose that . Then by Corollary 3.4. Let be the multidegree of . Using Theorem 3.5, we obtain
[TABLE]
This implies that , and for all . In particular, by Lemma 3.6 we have
[TABLE]
so that and . This means that for all and for all . ∎
Remark 3.8*.*
In fact, the first assertion of Lemma 3.7 holds under a weaker assumption that is a quasi-smooth well formed Fano weighted complete intersection, see [CCC11, Theorem 1.3]. However, quasi-smoothness is not enough for the second assertion to hold. For instance, a general hypersurface of degree in is a quasi-smooth well formed Fano curve for which such an assertion fails.
Similarly to Lemma 3.7, we prove the following result (which is also a particular case of Theorem 1.1).
Lemma 3.9**.**
Suppose that is a smooth well formed Fano weighted complete intersection of dimension and codimension that is not an intersection with a linear cone. Suppose that . Then is either a complete intersection of quadrics in , or a complete intersection of quadrics and a cubic in .
Proof.
We may assume that is normalized. Then by Corollary 3.4. Let be the multidegree of . Using Theorem 3.5, we obtain
[TABLE]
Suppose that . This means that for all , so that is a complete intersection in the usual projective space. From (3.1) we conclude that . If , then is a complete intersection of quadrics. If , then we look at (3.1) once again and see that for all one has . This means that is a complete intersection of quadrics and a cubic.
Now suppose that . If , then by Lemma 2.5 at least degrees among are divisible by , which is absurd. Thus . From (3.1) we have
[TABLE]
by Lemma 3.6. This means that and . Looking at (3.1) once again and keeping in mind that by assumption, we see that
[TABLE]
Since , one has either or . In the former case (3.2) gives . This contradicts the assumption that is not an intersection with a linear cone. In the latter case by Lemma 2.5 the number divides all degrees . Since is not an intersection with a linear cone, we see that for all . Using (3.2), we get
[TABLE]
which is again a contradiction. ∎
Now we are ready to prove Theorem 1.1 in full generality.
Proof of Theorem 1.1.
Assume that . By Theorem 3.2, the linear system is not empty. Let be a general divisor from . Then is smooth by Theorem 3.2. Moreover, is a well formed weighted complete intersection of multidegree in by Lemma 3.3, and is not an intersection with a linear cone. Furthermore, is Fano by Theorem 3.1. Observe that Theorem 1.1 holds for if and only if it holds for . Note also that if the dimension of is at most , then the assertion of Theorem 1.1 holds for by the classification of smooth Fano weighted complete intersections in low dimensions (see, for instance, [PSh18, Tables 1 and 2]).
Therefore, repeating the above procedure several times and keeping in mind Theorem 3.1, we may assume that , since both and do not change when we take the section. In this case we know that by Lemma 3.7, which proves assertion (i). Furthermore, if , then is a complete intersection of quadrics in by Lemma 3.9, which proves assertion (ii). Finally, if and , then is a complete intersection of quadrics and a cubic in by Lemma 3.9, which proves assertion (iii). ∎
Remark 3.10*.*
Assertion (iii) of Theorem 1.1 does not hold without the assumption that . Indeed, except for a cubic hypersurface in , there exist two other types of smooth well formed Fano weighted hypersurfaces of dimension and Fano index : a hypersurface of degree in , and a hypersurface of degree in , cf. [PSh19, Corollary 3.8(iii)].
It seems that the analog of Theorem 1.1 for does not look that nice. For instance, there are families of five-dimensional weighted complete intersections of such codimension, as well as families of six-dimensional weighted complete intersections. One of the latter varieties is a six-dimensional weighted complete intersection of multidegree in .
Question 3.11**.**
Is there a finite number of series of smooth well formed weighted complete intersections of codimension ?
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[CCC 11] J.-J. Chen, J. Chen, M. Chen, On quasismooth weighted complete intersections , J. Algebraic Geom. 20 (2011), no. 2, 239–262.
- 2[Di 86] A. Dimca, Singularities and coverings of weighted complete intersections , J. Reine Angew. Math. 366 (1986), 184–193.
- 3[Do 82] I. Dolgachev, Weighted projective varieties , in “Lecture Notes in Math.”, 956, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1982), 34–71.
- 4[IF 00] A. R. Iano-Fletcher, Working with weighted complete intersections , Explicit birational geometry of 3-folds, 101–173, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., 281, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2000.
- 5[IP 99] V. Iskovskikh, Yu. Prokhorov, Fano varieties , Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, 47 (1999) Springer, Berlin.
- 6[PST 17] M. Pizzato, T. Sano, L. Tasin, Effective nonvanishing for Fano weighted complete intersections , Algebra Number Theory 11 (2017), no. 10, 2369–2395.
- 7[P Sh 16] V. Przyjalkowski, C. Shramov, Bounds for smooth Fano weighted complete intersections , ar Xiv:1611.09556.
- 8[P Sh 18] V. Przyjalkowski, C. Shramov, Hodge level for weighted complete intersections , ar Xiv:1801.10489.
