First-principles study of LaOPbBiS$_3$ and its analogous compounds as thermoelectric materials
Keiya Kurematsu, Masayuki Ochi, Hidetomo Usui, Kazuhiko Kuroki

TL;DR
This study uses first-principles calculations to explore and identify potential high-performance thermoelectric materials among LaOBiPbS$_3$ analogs, revealing compounds with significantly improved power factors.
Contribution
It systematically investigates 24 variations of LaOBiPbS$_3$ compounds, predicting new materials with enhanced thermoelectric properties based on electronic structure analysis.
Findings
LaOSbPbSe$_3$ has a power factor five times higher than LaOBiPbS$_3$.
The choice of pnictogen atom influences thermoelectric performance through electronic structure effects.
Hybridization effects are crucial for gap opening and high thermoelectric efficiency.
Abstract
LaOBiPbS is a kind of pnictogen-dichalcogenide layered compounds, which have recently been experimentally investigated as thermoelectric materials owing to their low thermal conductivity and high controllability of constituent elements. However, thermoelectric performance of LaOBiPbS is at present not very high and that of its analogous compounds remains to be unknown. In this study, we theoretically investigate thermoelectric properties of 24 possible variations of the constituent elements in LaOBiPbS from the viewpoint of the electronic structure. We find that some compounds can have much better thermoelectric performance than LaOBiPbS; in particular, LaOSbPbSe is predicted to have a power factor five times as large as that of LaOBiPbS. Here, the choice of the pnictogen atom (As, Sb, and Bi), of which the low-energy conduction bands mainly consist, correlatesā¦
| (Ć ) | (Ć ) | - (Ć ) | PF (W cm-1 K-2) | Band gap (eV) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pb | Bi | S | S | 4.06 | 19.6 | 3.19 | 0.06 | 7.8 | 0.11 |
| S | Se | 4.13 | 20.2 | 3.24 | 0.06 | 7.8 | 0.05 | ||
| Se | S | 4.11 | 19.7 | 3.25 | 0.10 | 14.3 | 0 | ||
| Se | Se | 4.18 | 20.3 | 3.29 | 0.09 | 13.0 | 0 | ||
| Sb | S | S | 4.03 | 19.3 | 3.10 | 0.17 | 26.1 | 0.09 | |
| S | Se | 4.09 | 19.8 | 3.10 | 0.23 | 37.5 | 0.06 | ||
| Se | S | 4.08 | 19.4 | 3.17 | 0.19 | 29.0 | 0.06 | ||
| Se | Se | 4.14 | 20.0 | 3.17 | 0.26 | 40.8 | 0.04 | ||
| As | S | S | 3.97 | 18.7 | 2.99 | 0.16 | 38.1 | 0 | |
| S | Se | 4.02 | 19.3 | 2.97 | 0.15 | 36.3 | 0 | ||
| Se | S | 4.02 | 18.8 | 3.12 | 0.14 | 34.3 | 0 | ||
| Se | Se | 4.07 | 19.5 | 3.08 | 0.14 | 35.8 | 0 | ||
| Sn | Bi | S | S | 4.02 | 19.6 | 3.24 | 0.10 | 19.1 | 0 |
| S | Se | 4.09 | 20.5 | 3.48 | 0.09 | 18.5 | 0 | ||
| Se | S | 4.07 | 19.7 | 3.25 | 0.08 | 15.1 | 0 | ||
| Se | Se | 4.14 | 20.4 | 3.35 | 0.08 | 19.6 | 0 | ||
| Sb | S | S | 3.99 | 19.2 | 3.14 | 0.17 | 36.7 | 0 | |
| S | Se | 4.06 | 19.9 | 3.21 | 0.13 | 34.8 | 0 | ||
| Se | S | 4.04 | 19.3 | 3.16 | 0.17 | 32.7 | 0 | ||
| Se | Se | 4.10 | 20.0 | 3.20 | 0.15 | 36.2 | 0 | ||
| As | S | S | 3.91 | 18.7 | 2.98 | 0.07 | 25.9 | 0 | |
| S | Se | 3.97 | 19.3 | 3.03 | 0.02 | 12.0 | 0 | ||
| Se | S | 3.96 | 18.9 | 3.10 | 0.07 | 35.3 | 0 | ||
| Se | Se | 4.02 | 19.5 | 3.11 | 0.07 | 31.3 | 0 |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
First-principles study of LaOPbBiS3
and its analogous compounds as thermoelectric materials
Keiya Kurematsu1), Masayuki Ochi1), Hidetomo Usui2), and Kazuhiko Kuroki1)
*1)*Department of Physics, Osaka University, Machikaneyama-cho, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, Japan
*2)*Department of Material Science, Shimane University, Matsue, Shimane 690-8504, Japan
Abstract
LaOBiPbS3 is a kind of pnictogen-dichalcogenide layered compounds, which have recently been experimentally investigated as thermoelectric materials owing to their low thermal conductivity and high controllability of constituent elements. However, thermoelectric performance of LaOBiPbS3 is at present not very high and that of its analogous compounds remains to be unknown. In this study, we theoretically investigate thermoelectric properties of 24 possible variations of the constituent elements in LaOBiPbS3 from the viewpoint of the electronic structure. We find that some compounds can have much better thermoelectric performance than LaOBiPbS3; in particular, LaOSbPbSe3 is predicted to have a power factor five times as large as that of LaOBiPbS3. Here, the choice of the pnictogen atom (As, Sb, and Bi), of which the low-energy conduction bands mainly consist, correlates with the calculated power factor and the dimensionless figure of merit, . Such correlation comes from the fact that the low-dimensionality of the electronic structure, which enhances the density of states near the band edge, strongly depends on the pnictogen atom through, e.g., the strength of the spin-orbit coupling. Moreover, hybridization of the wave functions in the pnictogen-dichalcogenide layer and those in the rock-salt layer plays a key role in gap opening, and thus is important for achieving high thermoelectric performance. In LaOSbPbSe3, such hybridization also pushes up the conduction band bottom, which enhances the density of states near the band edge and thus the power factor.
ā ā preprint: APS/123-QED
I introduction
Thermoelectric generation has recently been receiving a lot of attention because of its importance in energy harvesting, and many researchers seek high-performance thermoelectric materials for putting it to partial use. The efficiency of thermoelectric conversion is assessed by the dimensionless figure of merit, :
[TABLE]
where and are the electrical conductivity, the Seebeck coefficient, the thermal conductivity, and the temperature, respectively. In the rightmost term of Eq.Ā (1), the thermal conductivity is written as the sum of the electronic and the phononic contribution: , and the power factor is defined as follows: , which is also used for measuring the thermoelectric performance. Through a long attempt to increase and PF, several favorable aspects of the electronic structure were found, such as the multi-valley band structureĀ PeiĀ etĀ al. (2011) and the low-dimensionalityĀ HicksĀ andĀ Dresselhaus (1993a); UsuiĀ andĀ Kuroki (2017); HicksĀ andĀ Dresselhaus (1993b); YamamotoĀ andĀ Fukuyama (2018).
From this viewpoint, pnictogen-dichalcogenide layered compoundsĀ Mizuguchi (2019), such as Bi4O4S3 and OBiS2 ( = La, Nd, Ce, etc.), which have been well-known as a superconductorĀ MizuguchiĀ etĀ al. (2012a, b); Mizuguchi (2015); YaziciĀ etĀ al. (2015); UsuiĀ andĀ Kuroki (2015) and recently gathered attention also as a thermoelectric materialĀ MizuguchiĀ etĀ al. (2016), are promising because they possess low-dimensional as well as multi-valley band structure, owing to the quasi-one-dimensional character of the - orbitals in the conducting layer ( = Pnictogen = Bi, Sb; = Chalcogen = S, Se)Ā UsuiĀ etĀ al. (2012); OchiĀ etĀ al. (2017, 2019) alternately stacked with the insulating layer. A rich variety of the insulating layer, such as O in OBiS2, is also preferable because it offers high controllability of the crystal structure. In addition, it was shown that the rattling motion of the Bi atom possibly reduces the thermal conductivity in LaOBiS2-xSex LeeĀ etĀ al. (2018); Lee (2019). As a matter of fact, LaOBiSSe was reported to exhibit a relatively high at 650 K with the low thermal conductivity ā W m*-1* K*-1*Ā NishidaĀ etĀ al. (2015). It is noteworthy that a recent theoretical studyĀ OchiĀ etĀ al. (2017) pointed out that the thermoelectric performance of OBiS2 can be sizably enhanced by using lighter and heavier elements for the pnictogen and chalcogen atoms, respectively. Along this line, recent experimental findings are intriguing: OSbSe2 exhibits a low thermal conductivity, 1.5 W m*-1* K*-1* for = La and 0.8 W m*-1* K*-1* for = CeĀ GotoĀ etĀ al. (2018), and is enhanced by a partial substitution of Sb for Bi in NdO0.8F0.2BiSe2Ā GotoĀ etĀ al. (2019).
Given this background, searching thermoelectric materials with the layer is an attractive idea. One possible candidate is LaOBiPbS3Ā SunĀ etĀ al. (2014); MizuguchiĀ etĀ al. (2017), where the BiS2 conducting layer is stacked not only with the LaO insulating layer but also with the PbS rock-salt layer, as shown in Fig.Ā 1. We note that, while Bi and Pb located at the 1 and 2 sites are not completely ordered, it was shown that the 1 (2) site is mainly occupied by Bi (Pb) atomĀ MizuguchiĀ etĀ al. (2017). From now on, this composition is denoted by LaO(PbS)BiS2, by which one can easily see the constituent elements of each layer. It is advantageous that the electron carrier doping is possible by a partial replacement of oxygen with fluorineĀ YuĀ etĀ al. (2019). While the thermoelectric performance of LaO(PbS)BiS2 is at present not very high, e.g., PF\,\sim 1.5$$\muW cm*-1* K*-2* at 770 KĀ YuĀ etĀ al. (2019), a possible enhancement of its performance is expected through a change of the constituent elements because of its large degrees of freedom, most of which still have remained unexplored.
In this study, we theoretically investigate the thermoelectric properties of LaO() ( = As, Sb, Bi; = Tetrel = Sn, Pb; = S, Se). We find a correlation between the choice of the atom, of which the low-energy conduction bands mainly consist, and the calculated PF and . Such correlation comes from the fact that the low-dimensionality of the electronic structure, which enhances the density of states (DOS) near the band edge, strongly depends on the atom through, e.g., the strength of the spin-orbit coupling (SOC). In addition, hybridization of the wave functions in the layer and those in the rock-salt layer plays a key role in gap opening, and thus is important for high thermoelectric performance. A calculated power factor of LaO(PbS)BiS2 is enhanced by a factor of five in LaO(PbSe)SbSe2, where the hybridization mentioned above also pushes up the conduction band bottom, which enhances DOS near the band edge and thus the power factor.
This paper is organized as follows. Section II presents the detailed procedure of our calculation and a brief description of the Boltzmann transport theory used in our work. We present the basic thermoelectric properties of LaO(PbS)BiS2 in Sec. III A. Section III B presents calculated PF and for all the chemical compositions investigated in this study, and theoretical analysis of it to clarify the role of each atom in LaO(). Section IV is devoted to the conclusion of this study.
II calculation method
First, we optimized the crystal structure of our target materials using the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof exchange-correlation functional revised for solids (PBEsol) Perdew et al. (2008) and the projector-augmented wave method Kresse and Joubert (1999) as implemented in the Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP) Kresse and Hafner (1993, 1994); Kresse and Furthmüller (1996, 1996). Our calculation started from the experimental crystal structure of LaO(PbS)BiS2 taken from Ref. Mizuguchi et al. (2017), and kept its symmetry, i.e., a space group of and the Wyckoff positions of the atoms therein, during the structural optimization. In addition, we assumed that our target material consists of the LaO, , and layers, i.e., we neglected the antisite occupation of the and sites. Further detailed analysis of the crystal symmetry and the antisite occupation is an important but challenging future issue. In the structural optimization, we used a mesh and a plane-wave cutoff energy of 550 eV with the inclusion of SOC. Obtained lattice constants for all the materials investigated in this study are shown in Appendix B.
Using the optimized crystal structure, we next performed band-structure calculation using the modified Becke-Johnson potential proposed by Tran and BlahaĀ BeckeĀ andĀ Johnson (2006); TranĀ andĀ Blaha (2009) and the full-potential (linearized) augmented plane-wave method as implemented in the wien2k packageĀ BlahaĀ etĀ al. (2001). We used a mesh and set the parameter to 7. SOC was included unless noted. Finally, we calculated the transport properties using the BoltzTraP packageĀ MadsenĀ andĀ Singh (2006). Using this package, one can calculate the following quantities on the basis of the Boltzmann transport theory with the constant relaxation-time approximation,
[TABLE]
where is the elementary charge and the is the transport coefficient expressed as follows:
[TABLE]
where are the relaxation time, the group velocity of the electron on the -th band at the certain Bloch wave vector , the Fermi-Dirac distribution function, electronic energy dispersion and the chemical potential, respectively. For calculating these quantities, we used a āmesh and the temperature . Because an experimental study on LaO1-xFx(PbS)BiS2 succeeded in performing electron-carrier doping by a partial replacement of oxygen with fluorineĀ YuĀ etĀ al. (2019), we concentrated on the transport properties in the electron-doped region using the rigid-band approximation. In addition, we concentrated on the in-plane diagonal components of these tensors, e.g., , because the off-diagonal components vanish for the space group of and the electronic conductivity along the axis is very small owing to the existence of the insulating layer. Because it is challenging to determine the relaxation time and the lattice thermal conductivity with first-principles calculation, we assumed and in this study. This value of the relaxation time is typical for thermoelectric materials. The lattice thermal conductivity here was determined by reference to the experimental total thermal conductivity of LaO(PbS)BiS2, 1ā4 at 50ā300 KĀ SunĀ etĀ al. (2014).
To obtain the orbital-decomposed band dispersion, we extracted the Wannier functions from the first-principles band structure without the maximal localization procedure by using the wien2wannier and wannier90 packages Mostofi et al. (2008); KuneŔ et al. (2010); Souza et al. (2001); Marzari and Vanderbilt (1997). We took the orbitals of all the atoms except for La as the Wannier functions, using a mesh in the Wannier construction. We also used these Wannier functions to see the role of the rock-salt layer in the thermoelectric performance, which we shall describe later in Sec.III B 4. In Sec. III B 4, we also calculated the transport properties using the tight-binding model consisting of the Wannier functions. For this purpose, we used a -mesh.
III results and discussion
III.1 Thermoelectric properties of LaO(PbS)BiS2
To begin with, we investigated the electronic structure of LaO(PbS)BiS2. FigureĀ 2(a) presents its first-principles band structure calculated with SOC. As shown by first-principles calculation presented in Ref.Ā MizuguchiĀ etĀ al. (2017), the valence and conduction bands mainly consist of the Bi- orbitals in the BiS2 layer and the S- orbitals in the PbS rock-salt layer, respectively. In other words, the band structure of LaO(PbS)BiS2 near the valence-band top can be regarded as a consequence of the hybridization between the conduction bands of the BiS2 layer and the valence bands of the PbS rock-salt layer. We note that the conduction bands here are quite similar to those in LaOBiS2, which has a stacked structure of the LaO insulating layer and the BiS2 conducting layerĀ UsuiĀ etĀ al. (2012). A difference between them, except the hybridization mentioned above, is the existence of the Pb- band edge in LaO(PbS)BiS2, which is indicated by a red dotted arrow (a dotted arrow with a higher energy at the X point) in Fig.Ā 2(a). Another dotted arrow colored in blue (a dotted arrow with a lower energy at the X point) in Fig.Ā 2(a) denotes the band edge of the Bi- bands. At the X = (, 0, 0) point, the Bi- bands form the band edges with different energies, one of which lies at the energy shown with the blue (lower-energy) dotted arrow and the other of which lies at the valence-band top in Fig.Ā 2(a). While the energy difference between these band edges are small when calculated without SOC as shown in Fig.Ā 2(b), SOC enhances the hybridization between the Bi- orbitals, and then the energy difference increases as shown in Fig.Ā 2(a), in the same manner as LaOBiS2Ā OchiĀ etĀ al. (2017).
Here, we point out that each band dispersion near the Fermi energy exhibits nearly two-fold degeneracy without the spin degrees of freedom, because there are two BiS2 layers and two PbS planes in the unit cell of LaO(PbS)BiS2 (see Fig.Ā 1). Because these two BiS2 layers are separated by the rock-salt layer, the band splitting caused by the bilayer coupling between the BiS2 layers is almost absent for the Bi- bands. As for LaOBiS2, where the BiS2 layers are neighboring, such a band splitting is actually small, partially by the symmetry of the crystal structure and the Bloch wave functionsĀ OchiĀ etĀ al. (2016), but larger than that in LaO(PbS)BiS2.
The last feature of the band structure we mention here is that there is a van Hove singularity (vHs) at the energy of around 0.8 eV indicated by blue solid arrows in Fig.Ā 2(a), which is the same feature as LaOBiS2Ā UsuiĀ etĀ al. (2012). We can verify the interesting aspects mentioned above also by looking into DOS shown in Figs.Ā 2(c)ā(d). Here, is the energy difference between the vHs indicated by the solid arrows in Figs.Ā 2(a)ā(d) and the conduction band bottom.
FigureĀ 2(e) presents the power factor PF, the Seebeck coefficient , and the electrical conductivity , calculated at 300 K with the inclusion of SOC. We can find that the band edges and vHs indicated by the arrows in Fig.Ā 2(c) result in peaks of PF. It is interesting that the PF peak around eV has a comparable height to the PF peak near the conduction band bottom, even though the former is energetically far away from the conduction band bottom. As a matter of fact, the band edges at the X point with higher energies indicated by dotted arrows in Fig.Ā 2(a) cannot yield a large PF peak as shown in Fig.Ā 2(e), because the Seebeck coefficient becomes too small by such a heavy electron doping. The PF peak around eV owes to the large DOS of vHs, which prevents the Seebeck coefficient from decreasing by increasing the chemical potential, and also augments the electrical conductivity. If this vHs gets close to the conduction band bottom, i.e., becomes small, the thermoelectric performance is expected to be much improved.
As pointed out in Ref.Ā OchiĀ etĀ al. (2017), the reduction of is closely related to the enhancement of the quasi-one-dimensionality of the electronic structure. In fact, the conduction band shown in Fig.Ā 2(a) has a sharp dispersion along the -X-M line, but a small corresponds to a less-dispersive nature of the band dispersion along certain directions (concretely, from X to the center of the -M line). Moreover, the insulating layer makes the band dispersion along the direction nearly flat. Therefore, the band dispersion hosts a quasi-one-dimensionality. In real space, such a quasi-one-dimensionality can be interpreted as a manifestation of the anisotropy of the in-plane Bi- and S- orbitals, which form the square lattice in the BiS2 conducting layer, similarly to LaOBiS2Ā UsuiĀ etĀ al. (2012). It is advantageous for high thermoelectric performance that such a quasi-one-dimensional band dispersion is degenerate with respect to the spin degrees of freedom and nearly degenerate with respect to the bilayer degrees of freedom. In addition, the equivalency between the and directions for the crystal symmetry yields the multi-valley character: one quasi-one-dimensional band is dispersive with respect to the direction and the other for the direction, corresponding to the anisotropy of the orbitals along the Bi-S bondsĀ UsuiĀ etĀ al. (2012).
It is noteworthy that decreasing (i.e., enhancing the low-dimensionality) was theoretically verified to be a good strategy for enhancing the power factor in LaOĀ OchiĀ etĀ al. (2017). One strategy for reducing in LaO shown in that study is to decrease SOC, which seems to work well also for our system. FigureĀ 2(f) presents the transport properties of LaO(PbS)BiS2 calculated with and without SOC, where is defined as the chemical potential measured from the conduction band bottom. For metallic systems we shall investigate later in this paper, is the Fermi energy, which is set at zero, and so holds. As shown in Fig.Ā 2(f), the electrical conductivity increases by turning off SOC, while keeping the Seebeck coefficient, which results in a sizable enhancement of PF. While the vHs is still far away from the conduction-band bottom even without SOC, an approach of the vHs to the band edge enhances DOS near the band edge as shown in Fig.Ā 2(d). The change of the electronic structure here owes to the suppression of the splitting of the - bands near the X point. Namely, the small splitting of the - bands near the X point makes the energy difference between the vHs and the conduction band bottom, , smallerĀ OchiĀ etĀ al. (2017). We shall see later that the choice of the atom in LaO() indeed affects its thermoelectric performance.
We note that the present calculation result shows higher thermoelectric performance than those of experimental previous studies, e.g., PF W cm*-1* K*-2* at 770 KĀ YuĀ etĀ al. (2019), W cm*-1* K*-2* at 300 KĀ SunĀ etĀ al. (2014). In these experimental studies, the material has been synthesized as polycrystals, so that the thermoelectric efficiency is suppressed due to the presence of insulating layers in between the conducting layers. The present study indicates that the thermoelectric performance of this material can be enhanced if single crystals can be synthesized.
III.2 Elemental substitution
To seek the possibility of enhancing the thermoelectric performance of LaO(PbS)BiS2, we have theoretically investigated 24 kinds of materials with the chemical composition LaO() ( = As, Sb, Bi; = Sn, Pb; = S, Se), which are analogous compounds of LaO(PbS)BiS2. Using s and 3.0 W m*-1* K*-1*, we calculated and PF for these 24 compositions as presented in Fig.Ā 3. In Fig.Ā 3, we can find some trends for PF and with respect to constituent elements: for example, becomes higher for Pb, Sb, and Se. In fact, we find that LaO(PbSe)SbSe2 exhibits the highest thermoelectric performance in these candidate materials: PF W cm*-1* K*-2* and for K. From the next section, we shall see the microscopic origin of these trends in detail. We note that these trends remain unaffected also when using s, which we have checked since the relaxation time (to be more precise, the ratio ) is regarded as an unknown parameter in this study.
III.2.1 Tt series
To investigate the role of the element in the thermoelectric performance, we calculated the electronic band structure of LaO(SnS)BiS2 as shown in Fig.Ā 4(a). By comparing it with that of LaO(PbS)BiS2 shown in Fig.Ā 2(a), a crucial consequence by substituting Pb with Sn is the closing of the band gap. One possible cause of the gap closing is the weakened coupling between the and layers for Sn. In fact, the - distance becomes longer by substituting Pb with Sn as listed on TableĀ 1 in AppendixĀ B. Because the downward and upward convex bands around the Fermi energy mainly consist of the - and - orbitals, respectivelyĀ MizuguchiĀ etĀ al. (2017), a long - distance for Sn will result in a smaller hybridization between these bands around the X point, and hence yield the metallic band structure. We note that all the compositions with Sn investigated in this study exhibit a metallic band structure in our calculation, while some compositions with Pb have a gapped one, as shown in TableĀ 1.
Fig.Ā 4(b) present , and PF of LaO(S)BiS2 with Sn and Pb. At , the metallic band structure for Sn yields a small Seebeck coefficient, which drastically degrades PF. Although PF of Sn becomes much higher than Pb at eV because of the high electrical conductivity for the former, the merit in is limited because the high electrical conductivity inevitably results in a high electronic thermal conductivity (), which appears in the denominator of . While LaO(SnS)BiS2 exhibits a maximum value larger than that of LaO(PbS)BiS2, most of the Sn group materials have smaller than the materials in the Pb group, as shown in TableĀ 1. The origin of this trend can be understood by the metallic band structure for Sn.
III.2.2 Pn series
As we have seen in Fig.Ā 3, a remarkable correlation exists between the element and the thermoelectric performance. Based on our observation described in the following analysis, there are two important ingredients that yield this correlation: quasi-one-dimensionality becomes strong by replacing Bi with lighter pnictogen atoms, but the arsenic makes the band structure metallic, which degrades, especially, .
FiguresĀ 5(a)ā(b) present the electronic band structure of LaO(PbS)AsS2 and LaO(PbS)SbS2, respectively. The overall characteristics of the band structure are common to LaO(PbS)S2 ( As, Sb, Bi), but one important difference is the gap closing for As. As a result, the transport properties, , , and PF, of LaO(PbS)AsS2 shown in Fig.Ā 5(c) exhibit a behavior similar to those of LaO(SnS)BiS2, which we have seen in the previous section. Namely, and PF become small at for LaO(PbS)AsS2 because of its metallic band structure. Although PF becomes large by heavy carrier doping there, peak is smaller than that of Sb, as shown in Fig.Ā 5(d), which is likely be due to the large electronic thermal conductivity for As with the metallic electronic structure. We note that all the other compositions with As also have a metallic band structure as shown in TableĀ 1.
For Sb, where the gap closing does not take place, PF and are much larger than those for Bi as shown in Figs.Ā 5(c)ā(d). For LaOBiS2, some of the present authors pointed out that a quasi-one-dimensionality of the electronic structure can be drastically enhanced by replacing Bi with Sb or As, because of the suppressed SOC, smaller inter-pnictogen transfer integrals, and the closer energy levels of the and S atomic orbitalsĀ OchiĀ etĀ al. (2017). In Sec.Ā III.1, we have already seen the effect of SOC on thermoelectric performance through the change in , i.e., the quasi-one-dimensionality, for our target material LaO(PbS)BiS2. Because both LaO(PbS)BiS2 and LaOBiS2 have the BiS2 conducting layer, the same strategy for improving the thermoelectric performance is expected to work well. As a matter of fact, we found that decreases from 0.65 eV for LaO(PbS)(BiS2) to 0.36 eV for LaO(PbS)(SbS2). As a result, PF and are enhanced for As and Sb compared with Bi. We note that the enhancement in PF shown in Fig.Ā 5(c) is larger than that induced by switching off SOC in LaO(PbS)BiS2 shown in Fig.Ā 2(f). This means that, while the suppression of SOC in As or Sb plays some role in enhancing PF, other effects described above should also be important in our material. In addition, an important difference between LaO(PbS)S2 and LaOS2 is the possibility of the gap closing for the former, depending on the coupling between the S2 and PbS layers. This difference results in the metallic band structure and thus the degraded thermoelectric performance for As as mentioned in the previous paragraph.
III.2.3 Ch series
FigureĀ 6(a) presents the electronic band structure of LaO(PbSe)SbSe2. By comparing it with the electronic band structure of LaO(PbS)SbS2 shown in Fig.Ā 5(b), we can find that the electronic band structure is less affected by the choice of the atom, except that the valence band structure is slightly shifted upward in Fig.Ā 6(a) because the energy levels of the Se atomic orbitals are higher than those of the S atomic orbitals.
However, by changing from S to Se, PF and are sizably enhanced. The calculated values of , , PF, DOS, and for LaO(Pb)Sb ( S, Se) are shown in Figs.Ā 6(b)ā(d). These quantities except of DOS were calculated at 300 K. By looking into Fig.Ā 6(c), DOS is less affected by , but the electrical conductivity shown in Fig.Ā 6(b) exhibits a sizable increase by the change of S Se, which means that the group velocity is enhanced by this change. A possible reason for it is the approaching energy levels of the Sb- orbitals and - orbitals as discussed in Ref.Ā OchiĀ etĀ al. (2017) for LaO, which strengthens the coupling between these atomic orbitals and then sharpens the band dispersion. Consequently, PF reaches a maximum value of nearly 40 W cm*-1* K*-2*. This value is similar to that of Bi2Te3, which is well known as a good thermoelectric material at room temperature. Although this comparison is based on a certain assumption for the value for the present material, the assumed value is still smaller than the known value for Bi2Te3.
On the other hand, the change of S Se only brings a small enhancement of PF and as shown in Figs.Ā 6(b) and (d). This weak enhancement may come from the increased DOS as shown in Fig.Ā 6(c). To investigate the origin of the DOS enhancement, we employed the Wannier orbitals to show the orbital character onto the band dispersion as presented in Figs.Ā 7(a)ā(d). We find that becomes small by the change of S Se, from to eV. The situation is schematically shown in Fig.Ā 7(e). Because of the different energy levels for the S- and Se- orbitals, the band bottom becomes a little far away from the conduction band bottom in Se, as a consequence of the band hybridization shown here. Thus, , which is the energy difference between the conduction band bottom and vHs, becomes smaller in Se. This means the quasi-one-dimensionality is enhanced, which enhances DOS near the band edge.
For all the pairs of (, ) for LaO(Pb)Sb, we verified that the band gap remains opened (see TableĀ 1) and the characteristic band deformation as shown in Fig.Ā 7(e) takes place at the X point. Such a deformed band dispersion reminds us of the pudding-mold-shaped band structureĀ KurokiĀ andĀ Arita (2007), which improves PF through the coexisting large DOS and the large group velocity for several materialsĀ KurokiĀ andĀ Arita (2007); UsuiĀ etĀ al. (2009, 2013); MoriĀ etĀ al. (2013); UsuiĀ etĀ al. (2014).
We note that the effect of the chalcogen atoms on the thermoelectric performance depends on the and elements as shown in TableĀ 1. In fact, the correlation between the thermoelectric performance, PF and , and elements is not so strong as shown in Fig.Ā 3. However, this weak correlation might be natural because of the relatively small difference of the band structure near the Fermi level induced by the chalcogen atoms, as we have seen in this section.
III.2.4 The effect of inserting rock-salt layer
In this section, we focus on the effect of inserting rock-salt layer on thermoelectric performance. For this purpose, we calculated the electronic band structure and the thermoelectric properties by using two types of tight-binding models: one consists of all Wannier functions and the other consists of Wannier functions except for those in the rock-salt layer (the - and the - orbitals). Figures 8 (a)ā(b) present the electronic band structures of two types of tight-binding model for LaO(PbSe)SbSe2, and those on the plane are shown in Figs. 8 (c)ā(d). In Fig. 8 (b), band dispersions originating from the rock-salt layer are not present because we used the tight-binding model not including Wannier functions in the rock-salt layer. On the other hand, in Figs. 8 (a), the band edge near the X point becomes less dispersive and decreases because of the hybridization between the - and the - bands as discussed in Sec.III A. As shown in Figs. 8 (c)ā(d), the band edge near the X point becomes like pudding-mold-shaped band structure (flattened band bottom) and the band dispersion along the lines becomes less dispersive (i.e. quasi-one-dimensionality is enhanced) by inserting the rock-salt layer. The comparison of the thermoelectric properties between two types of tight-binding models is presented in Figs.8 (e)ā(f) for LaO(PbSe)SbSe2. In the case of LaO(PbSe)SbSe2, changes from 0.46Ā eV to 0.25Ā eV by inserting rock-salt layer, which results in a PF peak shift as shown with arrows in Figs. 8 (e)ā(f). As a consequence of this PF peak shift, the maximum value of PF peak sizably increases by realizing both high Seebeck coefficient and high electrical conductivity. By inserting the rock-salt layer, the proportion of the volume of the conduction layer to the entire bulk is reduced, so that a reduction in the thermoelectric performance should be originally expected. However, it is surprising that there is instead an enhancement of PF. On the other hand, in the case of LaO(PbS)BiS2 (shown in appendix B), although becomes small by intercalating rock-salt layer (from 0.81 eV to 0.65 eV), vHs is still far away from conduction band bottom because of the effect of , which we discussed in the Sec.III B 2. Seebeck coefficient becomes too small by such a heavy electron doping and hence PF is also suppressed.
III.2.5 Temperature dependence of
Because of the narrow (or even zero) band gap in our target materials, the temperature dependence of the thermoelectric performance is worth investigating. Figure 9 presents the temperature dependence of for LaO(PbSe)SbSe2, which exhibits the highest within our calculation shown in this study. Here, the chemical potential is chosen at each temperature so as to realize the maximum at that temperature. We have tried three values for the relaxation time: 1, 5, 10 fs here, which is expected to cover a typical range of the relaxation time in thermoelectric materials.
Normally, narrow-gap semiconductor, like this material, cannot exhibit high thermoelectric performance at high temperature, because both electrons and holes are excited, which reduces the Seebeck coefficient (bipolar effect). However, we found that high thermoelectric performance is realized at relatively high temperature in LaO(PbSe)SbSe2: reaches around 0.9 at 1000 K for fs, and at 900 K for fs. Such a large owes to the deep chemical potential at the peak as shown in Fig.Ā 6(d), which prevents the generation of the hole carriers. We note that, in reality, the heavy carrier doping and high temperature inevitably shorten the relaxation time through active electron-phonon scattering, which will somewhat suppress at deep and high temperature. Since the first-principles treatment of the electron-phonon scattering is challenging, this point is an important future issue.
IV conclusion
We have theoretically investigated the thermoelectric performance (PF and ) of LaO(), and found that LaO(PbSe)SbSe2 achieves the best performance among these 24 candidate materials. For LaO(PbSe)SbSe2, reaches around 0.9 at 1000 K for fs, and at 900 K for fs. This high performance originates from the quasi-one-dimensionality of the electronic structure, which can be enhanced mainly by changing the atom, in the same manner as LaOBiS2. The non-zero band gap is also an important factor for high thermoelectric performance. For example, Sn is not favorable for achieving high because of the gap closing, induced by the suppressed coupling between the rock-salt layer and the conducting layer. Hybridization between the and layers is important not only for opening the gap, but also for making the van Hove singularity closer to the band edge, i.e., for enhancing the low-dimensionality and thus DOS near the band edge. Our study offers a possible designing principle for improving the thermoelectric performance of LaO(PbS)BiS2.
acknowlegments
We thank Yosuke Goto and Yoshikazu Mizuguchi for fruitful discussion. This work was supported by JST-CREST Grant Number JPMJCR16Q6 and JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP17H05481, JP17K14108, JP18K13470, JP19H04697.
Appendix A The effect of inserting rock-salt layer
Electronic band structures and thermoelectric properties of two types of tight-binding models for LaO(PbS)BiS2 are shown in Fig. 10.
Appendix B List of the optimized structural parameters, , PF, and the band gap
Calculated values of the optimized structural parameters, the maximum , the maximum PF, and the band gap of all the materials investigated in this study is shown in Table I.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Pei et al. (2011) Y. Pei, X. Shi, A. La Londe, H. Wang, L. Chen, and G. J. Snyder, Nature 473 , 66 (2011) . Ā· doiĀ ā
- 2Hicks and Dresselhaus (1993 a) L. D. Hicks and M. S. Dresselhaus, Phys. Rev. B 47 , 16631 (1993 a).
- 3Usui and Kuroki (2017) H. Usui and K. Kuroki, J. Appl. Phys. 121 , 165101 (2017) . Ā· doiĀ ā
- 4Hicks and Dresselhaus (1993 b) L. D. Hicks and M. S. Dresselhaus, Phys. Rev. B 47 , 12727 (1993 b) . Ā· doiĀ ā
- 5Yamamoto and Fukuyama (2018) T. Yamamoto and H. Fukuyama, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 87 , 114710 (2018) . Ā· doiĀ ā
- 6Mizuguchi (2019) Y. Mizuguchi, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 88 , 041001 (2019) . Ā· doiĀ ā
- 7Mizuguchi et al. (2012 a) Y. Mizuguchi, S. Demura, K. Deguchi, Y. Takano, H. Fujihisa, Y. Gotoh, H. Izawa, and O. Miura, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 81 , 114725 (2012 a).
- 8Mizuguchi et al. (2012 b) Y. Mizuguchi, H. Fujihisa, Y. Gotoh, K. Suzuki, H. Usui, K. Kuroki, S. Demura, Y. Takano, H. Izawa, and O. Miura, Phys. Rev. B 86 , 220510 (2012 b) . Ā· doiĀ ā
