Magic Polygons and Degenerated Magic Polygons: Characterization and Properties
Danniel Dias Augusto, Josimar da Silva Rocha

TL;DR
This paper introduces and characterizes Magic Polygons P(n, k) and Degenerated Magic Polygons D(n, k), analyzing their properties, existence conditions, and key parameters such as magic sum and root vertex value.
Contribution
It provides a formal definition, main properties, and existence conditions for both Magic Polygons and Degenerated Magic Polygons, expanding the understanding of these geometric structures.
Findings
Defined Magic Polygons P(n, k) and D(n, k)
Derived properties like magic sum and root vertex value
Discussed existence conditions for various n and k
Abstract
In this work we define Magic Polygons P (n, k) and Degenerated Magic Polygons D(n, k) and we obtain their main properties, such as the magic sum and the value corresponding to the root vertex. The existence of magic polygons P (n, k) and degenerated magic polygons D(n, k) are discussed for certain values of n and k.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGraph Labeling and Dimension Problems · Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
Magic Polygons and Degenerated Magic Polygons: Characterization and Properties
Danniel Dias Augusto
Josimar da Silva Rocha
Coordenação da Matemática, Universidade Estadual do Goiás, Unidade Universitária de Formosa, 73807-250, Formosa - GO, Brazil
Departamento de Matemática, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná,
Câmpus Cornélio Procópio,
86300-000, Cornélio Procópio - PR, Brazil
Abstract
In this work we define Magic Polygons and Degenerated Magic Polygons and we obtain their main properties, such as the magic sum and the value corresponding to the root vertex. The existence of magic polygons and degenerated magic polygons are discussed for certain values of and
keywords:
Combinatorics , Magic Polygons , Degenerated Magic Polygons.
1 Introduction
Magic Squares have been known for a long time in different people and cultures that, sometimes, has attributed mystic meanings [1, 2, 14]. In addiction to being used for recreational purposes, we can now find applications for magic squares in Physics, in Computer Science, in Image Processing and in Criptography [4, 5, 8], among others. In this way, have been developed several methods to construct magic squares that satisfies some particular properties and some generalization have been created, as we can see in [3, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13].
We can see in [6] a generalization of the same idea of the representation magic squares of order using vertices, midpoints and the geometric center of a square, where we can find some properties and the condiction of existence of magic polygons and a construction for magic square of order 4, for each even. In [12] others similar structures was proposed.
In this work we will cover a generalization of the work proposed in [6] and we show that some valid properties of magic polygons for a given order sometimes are not valid in general. In addition, we will introduce another class of polygonal structure known as the class of degenerate magic polygons.
2 Magic Polygons
Let be a set of regular polygons on plane with sides and corresponding parallel sides and centered in a central point
A magic polygon of sides and order is a set of points satisfying the following conditions:
- (i)
Points of magic polygon are labeled by distict values from to
- (ii)
One point of a magic polygon is the central point ;
- (iii)
points of magic polygon are vertices of the regular polygons of
- (iv)
The magic polygon has intermediate points on each edge of regular polygons in which gives a total of intermediate points.
- (v)
Segments with diametrically opposite ends of the larger polygon of intersecting the central vertex contain points of the magic polygon;
- (vi)
Segments with ends at two adjacent vertices of a polygon of contains points of the magic polygon;
- (vii)
The sum of values corresponding to the points on each segment defined in (iv) and (v) is a fixed value called of magic sum.
In Figures 1 e 2 we can see examples of Magic Polygons and respectively.
Theorem 1**.**
In a magic polygon we have the following properties:
- (i)
the magic sum is
- (ii)
the value corresponding to the root vertex is
- (iii)
the sum of the values representing to -th points partitioning each edge on magic polygon chosen clockwise is
[TABLE]
Proof.
Let be the value correspondig to the point -th point of the -th edge of the -th regular polygon.
Each point of the magic polygon is labeled for a number
[TABLE]
where and and the root vertice is labeled by the number then we have
[TABLE]
point in the magic polygon.
The sum of values correspondig points on the -th edge of -th regular polygon is given by
[TABLE]
where is the magic sum.
The sum of values correspondig points on the segments determined by the points and is
[TABLE]
where is the value assigned to the root vertice and
Let
[TABLE]
for
[TABLE]
which implies that
[TABLE]
Adding equations involving points on perimeters of the polygons, we obtain
[TABLE]
Adding equations involving the root vertex of the magic polygon, we obtain
[TABLE]
which implies that
[TABLE]
Subtracting (9) from (7), we have
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Therefore
[TABLE]
As values corresponding to the points of the magic polygon are distinct values in it follows that
[TABLE]
By (9) and (13), it follows that
[TABLE]
By (12) and (14), it follows that
[TABLE]
Therefore
[TABLE]
Moreover,
[TABLE]
∎
2.1 Constructing examples for
The following result affords us a construction for provided that some conditions are satisfied:
Theorem 2**.**
Let two regular polygons with sides of distinct sizes centered on a central point whose sides are partitioned into segments by points such that segments passing through the center point and cutting the larger polygon intercept the sides of the polygons at these points, satisfying the following conditions:
- (i)
Each point on partitions is labeled by
- (ii)
a central point is labeled by
- (iii)
**
- (iv)
* if *
- (v)
**
where e
In this conditions, we obtain points that define a magic polygon
Proof.
Let
By (iii), we have for
Therefore
[TABLE]
By (18) and (v), we get
[TABLE]
Thus
[TABLE]
Consequently, the sum of values corresponding to the points on edges of the polygons is
Therefore, by (iii) and (ii), we get
[TABLE]
Consequently, the sum of values corresponding to the points on the segments lying by central point is also
Hence, by definition, we get ∎
In Figure 3 we have an example of Magic Polygon constructed by Theorem 2. An example of Magic Polygon that can not be obtained by this construction can be seen in the figure 1.
2.2 The particular case
Although it is a particular case of the general case seen in the previous section, we will use another reasoning for a demonstration of the properties of the magic polygons
A magic polygon is formed by points, consisting of the vertices, the midpoints of the edges, and the geometric center of a regular polygon of sides, which are labeled by numerical values from to , so that the sum of the values assigned to any three collinear pointes is constant, called magic sum.
Theorem 3**.**
If is even, then a magic polygon has the following properties:
- (i)
the magic sum is é
- (ii)
the value corresponding to the central point is é
- (iii)
the sum of the values assigned to vertices of the magic polygon and the sum of the values assigned to midpoints of edges of the magic polygon satisfies
Proof.
As a polygon with sides has vertex and midpoints, including a central point, we obtain points labeled using distinct integers numbers from to .
Let be the value assign to vertex and let be the values assign to the midpoint whose endpoints are and For each let be the value assigned to the vertex and let be the value assigned to midpoint whose endpoints are e
For each let be the value assigned to the point diametrically opposite to vertice and be the value assigned to the point diametrically opposite to the midpoint
Denoting by the value assigned by the central point of the magic polygon and denoting by the value of the magic sum, we obtain two sets of equations that define a magic polygon with sides, for an even number : the equations involving points on the same side and equations involving points on simmetry axes of the magic polygon.
Analyzing equation involving points on the same side of a magic polygon, we obtain
[TABLE]
Analyzing equations involving points on the same segment in the definition of a magic polygon, we obtain
[TABLE]
Let
[TABLE]
Adding the equations of (22), we get
[TABLE]
Adding the equations of (23), we get
[TABLE]
Subtracting (25) from (24), we get
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
As the values assigned to the midpoints of the magic polygon with sides are distinct values of the set and the sum of this values is , then
[TABLE]
In addition,
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Therefore, by (28), (29) and (30), we get
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Moreover,
[TABLE]
Therefore, by (32) and (33), we obtain the follow diophantine equation
[TABLE]
whose general solution is
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Simplyfing (37), we obtain
[TABLE]
It follows from and (38) that hence
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Therefore, the magic sum is and the value assigned to the central point is
Replacing e from (40) in (26) and (27), we obtain
[TABLE]
∎
Theorem 4**.**
If is odd, then there is no magic polygon .
Proof.
Let be odd and suppose that there is magic polygons with sides.
If are integer numbers corresponding vertices and are integer numbers corresponding midpoints of the magic polygon, where is the midpoint between the vertices and we have
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
where is the value assigned to the root vertex of the magic polygon and or if
By (43), we obtain
[TABLE]
Substituting (26) into (42), we obtain
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Taking and in the first equality of (47), we obtain which implies
Taking and in (47), we get
Therefore, we can not have a magic polygons with sides, for odd.
∎
Theorem 5**.**
If is an even number greater than or equal to 4, then there is a magic polygon .
Proof.
Figure 4 shows the existence of Magic Polygons Let be even greater than or equal to 6 and consider a regular polygon with sides whose perimeter is indicated by the sequence of vertices clockwise . Thus, if for each is the value assigned to vertex and is the value assigned to midpoint of the side whose ends are the vertices and of the magic polygon, then we obtain a magic polygon with sides such that, for the values assigned to vertices of the magic polygon satisfy
[TABLE]
and the values assigned to midpoints of magic polygon satisfy
[TABLE]
The verification that this construction defines a magic polygon can be seen in [6]. ∎
In Figure 5 we have an example of Magic Polygon using construction in the proof of the Theorem 5.
Proposition 1**.**
There are no magic polygons whose values assigned to all vertices have odd parity.
Proof.
If the values assigned to all vertices are odd numbers, then, by definition of Magic Polygon, the values assigned to midpoints are even numbers. This contradicts the fact that the magic sum is an odd number, by Theorems 3 and 4. ∎
Corollary 1**.**
There is no Magic Polygon whose values assigned to all midpoints are even numbers.
Proof.
If all values assigned to midpoints of the Magic Polygon are even numbers, then, by definition of Magic Polygon, the values assigned to vertices of the Magic Polygon are odd numbers. This contradicts the Proposition 1. ∎
3 Degenerated Magic Polygons
Let be a set of regular polygons with distinct sizes and with a common vertex C, called the root vertex.
A degenerated magic polygon with sides and order is a set of points that satisfies the following conditions:
- (i)
points of degenerated magic polygon are assigned by distinct numbers from to
- (ii)
One point is the root vertex
- (iii)
points are the vertices of regular polygons of
- (iv)
each of the edges of the regular polygons not adjacent to the root vertices of have intermediate points of the magic polygon beyond the vertices of the polygons, which gives a total of intermediate points;
- (v)
Segments with one end in points at the border of the larger polygon of and other end on root vertex have points of degenerated magic polygon;
- (vi)
Segments with ends on adjacent vertices of polygons of that do not contain the root vertex have points of degenerated magic polygon;
- (vii)
The sum of values assigned to the points of the degenerated magic polygon in each of the segments defined in (v) and (vi) is a fixed value called the magic sum.
Figures 6 and 7 illustrate the existence of Degenerated Magic Polygons.
Theorem 6**.**
A degenerated magic polygon has the following properties:
- (i)
the magic sum is
- (ii)
the value that corresponds to the root vertex is
- (iii)
the sum of the values assigns to the -th points on the edges in the representation of the degenerated magic polygon satisfies
[TABLE]
Proof.
Let be the -th point of the -th edge of the -th largest polygon that represents the degenerated magic polygon considering the clockwise direction, let
[TABLE]
be the value assigned to the point
[TABLE]
be the value assigned to the point where and the root vertex is labeled by the number So we have
[TABLE]
points in the degenerated magic polygon.
The equations involving segments that don’t contain the root vertex are
[TABLE]
The equations involving segments containing the root vertex are
[TABLE]
where e and
[TABLE]
Let
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
for
By adding equations involving perimeters in the degenerated magic polygon, we obtain
[TABLE]
or, equivalently,
[TABLE]
By adding equations involving the root vertex of the degenerated magic polygon, we obtain
[TABLE]
or, equivalently,
[TABLE]
By subtracting (57) from (55), we obtain
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Hence
[TABLE]
As the values assigned to the points of the degenerated magic polygon are distinct values of the set we obtain
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
that implies
[TABLE]
∎
Corollary 2**.**
If and are positive integer numbers, such that is odd and is even, then there is no degenerated magic polygon
Proof.
By Theorem 6,
[TABLE]
Therefore, if is odd and is even, then is not a integer number. Hence, there is no degenerated magic polygon of order with vertex for odd and even.
∎
Theorem 7**.**
If is an integer number greater than or equal to 3, then there is a degenerated magic polygon .
Proof.
Let be the root vertex of a degenerated magic polygon be the sequence of vertices of the largest polygon and be the sequence of vertices of smallest polygon, both on clockwise direction.
For each we consider the point of degenerated magic polygon between and and the point of the degenerated magic polygon between and
Thus, if is the value assigned to the root vertex and for each is the value assigned to the vertex is the value assigned to the vertex is the value assigned to the point and is the value assigned to the point then, the following conditions are satisfied:
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Setting, for each
[TABLE]
then, we obtain a degenerated magic polygon
In fact, the condictions on segments are satisfied, because
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
In addition, all values assigned to the points are different because
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
satisfy
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
∎
In Figure 6 we have an example of Magic Polygon constructed in the proof of the Theorem 7. An example of Magic Polygon that can not be obtained by this construction can be seen in the figure 9.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] W.R. Andress, Basic properties of pandiagonal magic squares, Amer. Math. Monthly 67 (1960) 143–152.
- 2[2] S. Cammann, The evolution of magic squares in China, J. Am. Oriental Soc. 80 (1960) 116–124.
- 3[3] C.Y.J. Chan et al., A construction of regular magic squares of odd order, Linear Algebra and its Applications 457 (2014) 293–302
- 4[4] K.L. Chu, S.W. Drury, G.P.H. Styan, G. Trenkler, Magic Moore–Penrose inverses and philatelic magic square with special emphasis on the Daniels–Zlobec magic square, Croatian Oper. Res. Rev. 2 (2011) 4–13.
- 5[5] G. Ganapathy, K. Mani, Add-on security model for public-key cryptosystem based on magic square implementation, in: Proc. World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 1 WCECS, 2009.
- 6[6] V. Jakicic, R. Bouchat, Magic Polygons and their properties, http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1801.02262 v 1, 2018.
- 7[7] Y. Kim, J. Yoo, An algorithm for constructing magic squares, Discrete Applied Mathematics 156 (2008) 2804–2809.
- 8[8] P.D. Loly, Franklin squares: a chapter in the scientific studies of magical squares, Complex Systems 17 (2007) 143–161. .
