Comment on "Counter-propagating charge transport in the quantum Hall effect regime"
Yigal Meir, Ady Stern

TL;DR
This paper reinterprets experimental observations of upstream currents in the nu=2/3 quantum Hall regime, suggesting they are due to neutral modes rather than counter-propagating charge modes, aligning with existing theoretical expectations.
Contribution
It provides an alternative explanation for upstream currents in the nu=2/3 regime, emphasizing the role of upstream neutral modes over charge modes.
Findings
Upstream currents can be explained by neutral modes, not charge modes.
The observed data aligns with the neutral mode explanation.
Upstream charge modes are not necessary to explain the phenomena.
Abstract
Laffont et al. [Science 363, 54-57 (2019)] report an upstream current in the nu=2/3 quantum Hall regime, which, they claim, might be due to a counter-propagating charge mode. We show that this observation can also be explained by the expected upstream neutral mode, without the need for an upstream charge mode. Our results agree with the observed data and explain why the upstream current is observed only in the unpolarized nu=2/3 regime.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum and electron transport phenomena · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design · Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques
