The electromagnetic self-force of a uniformly charged spherical ball
G. Vaman

TL;DR
This paper calculates the electromagnetic self-force on a uniformly charged spherical ball moving in a straight line, providing insights into its self-interaction without considering Lorentz contraction effects.
Contribution
It offers a novel calculation of the self-force for a uniformly charged sphere in rectilinear motion, neglecting Lorentz contraction.
Findings
Derived explicit expression for self-force
Clarified effects of uniform charge distribution
Neglected Lorentz contraction in analysis
Abstract
We calculate the electromagnetic self-force of a uniformly charged spherical ball moving on a rectilinear trajectory, neglecting the Lorentz contraction.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum and Classical Electrodynamics · Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies · Scientific Research and Discoveries
The electromagnetic self-force of a uniformly charged spherical ball
G. Vaman
Institute of Atomic Physics, P. O. Box MG-6, Bucharest, Romania
We calculate the electromagnetic self-force of a uniformly charged spherical ball moving on a rectilinear trajectory, neglecting the Lorentz contraction.
1. Introduction
In this paper, we calculate the electromagnetic self-force of a uniformly charged spherical ball, moving on a rectilinear trajectory, with a time-dependent velocity. To this end, we use the ansatz from [1], Eq. (4)
[TABLE]
where is the self-force and is the self-field momentum of the charge distribution.
The charge density of a uniformly charged ball of total charge and radius , in the proper frame, is
[TABLE]
where is the Heaviside function. We start our calculation from its multipole expansion
[TABLE]
where is the Dirac delta function. Eq. (1) can be justified, for example, as in [2]. We consider that the charge distribution is spherical in the laboratory frame, so our results are valid for small velocities. To obtain the charge density in the laboratory frame, we replace in the right hand side of (1) with , where we supposed that the ball is moving along the axis, with the velocity .
2.The calculation of the self-force
Starting from Eq. (1) we can calculate easily the electromagnetic potentials
[TABLE]
and the fields
[TABLE]
We write bellow only the and components of the fields.
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
where and . The Fourier transforms of the above fields are
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
where and , is the spherical Bessel function of the first kind, and the Fourier transform of a function is defined as . To obtain Eqs. (4), (5), we used
[TABLE]
We calculate the self-force by integrating in the Fourier space
[TABLE]
We introduce Eqs. (4), (5) in Eq. (2.The calculation of the self-force) and perform the integration over angles using
[TABLE]
One obtains
[TABLE]
and, after changing the summation indices , ,
[TABLE]
To perform the integral over , we use the method from [3]. We introduce the auxiliary integral
[TABLE]
and use
[TABLE]
At the end, we will take . In the following, to shorten the formulas, we will omit from the argument of . We need to consider separately the cases , and .
Case =0
[TABLE]
For the integral , we use the result from the appendix, and for taking the derivatives required for the calculation of , we will use .
Case =1
[TABLE]
We transform the products of trigonometric functions into sums, and use Eq. 3.828 (2) from [4]
[TABLE]
After taking the derivatives, we will use the identities , where is the signum function, and . After a little algebra, one obtains
[TABLE]
where. again, we have written only the terms which will contribute to the integral over .
Case
[TABLE]
We transform the products of trigonometric functions into sums, and use , where the upper index between parenthesis is the order of the derivative with respect to the argument. Keeping only the terms which will give contribution to the integral over , one obtains:
[TABLE]
We can see from Eq. (2.The calculation of the self-force) that is a discontinuous function of variable , because will give contribution only for . So, if we try to evaluate the integral (15) by expanding the spherical Bessel functions in Taylor series and integrating term by term, the result will not be accurate in the whole domain , because a discontinuous function cannot be well approximated by a single power series.
With these results, we can return to Eq.(2.The calculation of the self-force) and perform the integral over and , as explained in [1]. We denote the results obtained for , , by , and respectively. So, we have Compared to the calculations from [1], a supplementary difficulty appears in the evaluation of , because the first two terms from Eq.(19) are not Dirac delta functions. So, in the following, we present the detailed calculations only for .
From Eqs. (2.The calculation of the self-force), (19), we obtain
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
In Eqs. (23), (24), we change the variables of integration , , , and then we use the formula
[TABLE]
which can be easily inferred from the Leibniz integral rule. One obtains
[TABLE]
so, the contributions from and cancel each other in Eq. (22). In Eq. (25), we change the variable of integration , and we obtain
[TABLE]
From Eqs. (22), (26), (27), one obtains . Analogously, we calculate and , and we obtain the final result
[TABLE]
The first terms of the above equation are
[TABLE]
where , , and the summation over has been performed as in [1], Eq. (28). Using we obtain
[TABLE]
3. Conclusions
We have calculated in this paper the electromagnetic self-force of a uniformly charged ball moving on a rectiliner trajectory, neglecting the Lorentz contraction. Our result (2.The calculation of the self-force) contains a dominant term which is directly proportional to the velocity and inversely proportional to the square of the radius. It is different from the dominant term of the Sommerfeld-Page equation , which is directly proportional to the acceleration and inversely proportional to the radius, and which is usually dropped because it is indistinguishable from the term in the equation of motion. This result supports the ideea that, even for small dimensions, the self-force is strongly dependent on the charge density.
Acknowledgement The author is deeply grateful to Professor Vladimir Hnizdo for very useful e-mail correspondence.
Appendix
**The calculation of the integral **
This integral can be calculated integrating by parts in three steps. In the first step we use , in the second step, , and in the last step . One obtains
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Note that, for , one obtains eq. (3.746) from [4].
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] V. Hnizdo, G. Vaman, ”Electromagnetic self-force of a point charge from the rate of change of the momentum of its retarded self-field”, https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.04488.
- 2[2] E. G. P. Rowe, ”Spherical delta functions and multipole expansions”, J. Math. Phys. 19, 1962 (1978).
- 3[3] V. I. Fabrikant, ”Elementary exact evaluation of infinite integrals of the product of several spherical Bessel functions, power and exponential”, Quart. Appl. Math. LXXI, 573 (2012).
- 4[4] I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhic, ”Table of integrals, series and products”, 4th edition, Fizmatgiz, Moscow, (1963) (in russian).
