# Advances and challenges in single-molecule electron transport

**Authors:** Ferdinand Evers, Richard Koryt\'ar, Sumit Tewari, and Jan M. van, Ruitenbeek

arXiv: 1906.10449 · 2020-07-22

## TL;DR

This review compares experimental and theoretical approaches to single-molecule electron transport, highlighting current successes, discrepancies, and proposing directions for improved models including dynamic effects and electron correlations.

## Contribution

It critically analyzes the agreement between theory and experiment in single-molecule transport, emphasizing the need for benchmark systems and model extensions.

## Key findings

- Theoretical trends match experiments well for certain molecules.
- Quantitative agreement remains challenging due to model limitations.
- Key experiments suggest the need for more comprehensive models including dynamic effects.

## Abstract

Electronic transport properties for single-molecule junctions have been widely measured by several techniques, including mechanically controllable break junctions, electromigration break junctions or by means of scanning tunneling microscopes. In parallel, many theoretical tools have been developed and refined for describing such transport properties and for obtaining numerical predictions. Most prominent among these theoretical tools are those based upon density functional theory. In this review, theory and experiment are critically compared and this confrontation leads to several important conclusions. The theoretically predicted trends nowadays reproduce the experimental findings quite well for series of molecules with a single well-defined control parameter, such as the length of the molecules. The quantitative agreement between theory and experiment usually is less convincing, however. Many reasons for quantitative discrepancies can be identified, from which one may decide that qualitative agreement is the best one may expect with present modeling tools. For further progress, benchmark systems are required that are sufficiently well-defined by experiment to allow quantitative testing of the approximation schemes underlying the theoretical modeling. Several key experiments can be identified suggesting that the present description may even be qualitatively incomplete in some cases. Such key experimental observations and their current models are also discussed here, leading to several suggestions for extensions of the models towards including dynamic image charges, electron correlations, and polaron formation.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.10449/full.md

## Figures

51 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.10449/full.md

## References

538 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.10449/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.10449