Bayesian influence diagnostics and outlier detection for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
Yuki Matsushima, Hisashi Noma, Tomohide Yamada, Toshi A. Furukawa

TL;DR
This paper introduces Bayesian influence diagnostics and outlier detection methods for meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy, addressing the challenge of identifying studies that may bias results due to their outlying or influential nature.
Contribution
It develops synthetic influence measures based on bivariate hierarchical Bayesian models for comprehensive outlier and influence detection in DTA meta-analyses, including new influence metrics.
Findings
Effective detection of outlying studies demonstrated
Synthetic influence measures outperform traditional methods
Application to ultrasound screening study illustrates practical utility
Abstract
Meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies have been gaining prominence in research in clinical epidemiology and health technology development. In these DTA meta-analyses, some studies may have markedly different characteristics from the others, and potentially be inappropriate to include. The inclusion of these "outlying" studies might lead to biases, yielding misleading results. In addition, there might be influential studies that have notable impacts on the results. In this article, we propose Bayesian methods for detecting outlying studies and their influence diagnostics in DTA meta-analyses. Synthetic influence measures based on the bivariate hierarchical Bayesian random effects models are developed because the overall influences of individual studies should be simultaneously assessed by the two outcome variables and their correlation information. We propose four…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
