# on some (so-called) paradoxes of quantum physics

## TL;DR

This paper examines famous quantum paradoxes, arguing they reflect transitional stages in physics' evolution and cautioning against metaphysical overinterpretations.

## Contribution

It provides a philosophical analysis of quantum paradoxes, emphasizing their temporary nature and the importance of cautious interpretation.

## Key findings

- Quantum paradoxes are transitional phenomena in physics.
- Caution is advised to prevent metaphysical overreach.
- Quantum paradoxes may become outdated with future scientific progress.

## Abstract

This article is devoted to the study of which appears as the most famous paradoxes of quantum theory (Schrodinger cat, EPR argument and Aspect experiments, delayed choice experiments and retrocausality problems). Through these experiments, physics raises so fundamental questions that it borders, at the limit, with metaphysics. The present article supports the idea that the difficulties encountered, so puzzling they are, manifest only a transitional state of the evolution of physics, that can be expected to be outdated one day. In the meantime, caution is necessary to avoid the excesses that could lead to metaphysical considerations a little too premature.