# AI vs Humans for the diagnosis of sleep apnea

**Authors:** Valentin Thorey, Albert Bou Hernandez, Pierrick J. Arnal, Emmanuel H., During

arXiv: 1906.09936 · 2019-06-25

## TL;DR

This study demonstrates that a deep learning model can diagnose sleep apnea from PSG data with accuracy comparable to human experts, potentially streamlining diagnosis and reducing variability.

## Contribution

We adapted our deep learning method DOSED for sleep apnea detection, achieving expert-level performance in diagnosing OSA from PSG recordings.

## Key findings

- Automatic approach reached 81% accuracy in OSA severity diagnosis.
- F1 score for event detection was 0.57, comparable to human experts.
- Deep learning can perform at sleep expert level for sleep apnea diagnosis.

## Abstract

Polysomnography (PSG) is the gold standard for diagnosing sleep obstructive apnea (OSA). It allows monitoring of breathing events throughout the night. The detection of these events is usually done by trained sleep experts. However, this task is tedious, highly time-consuming and subject to important inter-scorer variability. In this study, we adapted our state-of-the-art deep learning method for sleep event detection, DOSED, to the detection of sleep breathing events in PSG for the diagnosis of OSA. We used a dataset of 52 PSG recordings with apnea-hypopnea event scoring from 5 trained sleep experts. We assessed the performance of the automatic approach and compared it to the inter-scorer performance for both the diagnosis of OSA severity and, at the microscale, for the detection of single breathing events. We observed that human sleep experts reached an average accuracy of 75\% while the automatic approach reached 81\% for sleep apnea severity diagnosis. The F1 score for individual event detection was 0.55 for experts and 0.57 for the automatic approach, on average. These results demonstrate that the automatic approach can perform at a sleep expert level for the diagnosis of OSA.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.09936/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.09936/full.md

## References

15 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.09936/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.09936