# Self Multi-Head Attention for Speaker Recognition

**Authors:** Miquel India, Pooyan Safari, Javier Hernando

arXiv: 1906.09890 · 2019-07-03

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a self multi-head attention mechanism for speaker recognition that enhances utterance-level speaker embeddings, outperforming traditional pooling methods and significantly reducing error rates on the VoxCeleb1 dataset.

## Contribution

The work proposes a novel self multi-head attention model for speaker embedding extraction, improving over existing pooling techniques in speaker recognition tasks.

## Key findings

- Outperforms temporal and statistical pooling with 18% relative EER reduction.
- Achieves 58% relative improvement in EER over i-vector+PLDA.
- Effective in long-term speaker representation from variable-length speech.

## Abstract

Most state-of-the-art Deep Learning (DL) approaches for speaker recognition work on a short utterance level. Given the speech signal, these algorithms extract a sequence of speaker embeddings from short segments and those are averaged to obtain an utterance level speaker representation. In this work we propose the use of an attention mechanism to obtain a discriminative speaker embedding given non fixed length speech utterances. Our system is based on a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) that encodes short-term speaker features from the spectrogram and a self multi-head attention model that maps these representations into a long-term speaker embedding. The attention model that we propose produces multiple alignments from different subsegments of the CNN encoded states over the sequence. Hence this mechanism works as a pooling layer which decides the most discriminative features over the sequence to obtain an utterance level representation. We have tested this approach for the verification task for the VoxCeleb1 dataset. The results show that self multi-head attention outperforms both temporal and statistical pooling methods with a 18\% of relative EER. Obtained results show a 58\% relative improvement in EER compared to i-vector+PLDA.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.09890/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.09890/full.md

## References

26 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.09890/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.09890