# On the Role of Counterterms in Holographic Complexity

**Authors:** Amin Akhavan, Farzad Omidi

arXiv: 1906.09561 · 2021-02-18

## TL;DR

This paper introduces new covariant counterterms on null boundaries within the Complexity=Action framework to eliminate UV divergences in holographic complexity calculations, ensuring finite results without altering equations of motion.

## Contribution

It presents novel null boundary counterterms for holographic complexity that remove divergences and are compatible with existing regularization methods.

## Key findings

- Null counterterms successfully remove all UV divergences.
- Counterterms do not affect the complexity of formation.
- Methods are equivalent when including Gibbons-Hawking-York terms.

## Abstract

We consider the Complexity=Action (CA) proposal in Einstein gravity and investigate new counterterms which are able to remove all the UV divergences of holographic complexity. We first show that the two different methods for regularizing the gravitational on-shell action proposed in Ref. \cite{Carmi:2016wjl} are completely equivalent, provided that one considers the Gibbons-Hawking-York term as well as new counterterms inspired from holographic renormalization on timelike boundaries of the WDW patch. Next, we introduce new counterterms on the null boundaries of the WDW patch for four and five dimensional asymptotically AdS spacetimes which are able to remove all the UV divergences of the on-shell action. Moreover, they are covariant and do not change the equations of motion. At the end, by applying the null counterterms, we calculate the holographic complexity of an AdS-Schwarzschild black hole as well as the complexity of formation. We show that the null counterterms do not change the complexity of formation.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.09561/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.09561/full.md

## References

63 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.09561/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.09561