On the Gauss map of finite geometric type surfaces
N\'icolas A. de Andrade, Luquesio P. Jorge

TL;DR
This paper generalizes the little Picard theorem to finite geometric type surfaces, showing their Gauss maps cannot omit more than two points, and classifies cases where the Gauss map is a regular covering.
Contribution
It provides a topological proof of the Gauss map's limitations and classifies finite geometric type surfaces with Gauss maps as regular coverings, extending classical theorems.
Findings
Gauss map cannot omit three or more points for minimal, non-flat finite geometric type surfaces.
Classifies finite geometric type surfaces with Gauss maps as regular coverings.
Generalizes the little Picard theorem to these surfaces.
Abstract
Surfaces of finite geometric type are complete, immersed into the tree-dimensional Euclidean space with finite total curvature and Gauss map extending to an oriented compact surface as a smooth branched covering map over the unit sphere of the Euclidean three dimensional space. In a recent preprint J. Jorge and F. Mercuri gave a geometric proof that the Gauss map can not omit three or more points if the immersion is minimal and no flat. Here we give a topological proof of this result in the class of no flat finite geometric type surfaces and also give a topological classification when the Gauss map is a regular covering map. This facts are easy applications of our main result, a generalization of the little Picard theorem for the class of branched covering of a finite geometric type surface into the unit sphere of the tree dimensional Euclidean space. A finite geometric type surface…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometric Analysis and Curvature Flows · Mathematics and Applications · Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory
On the Gauss map of finite
geometric type surfaces.
N. A. de Andrade and L. P. Jorge
(2018-12-22)
Abstract
Surfaces of finite geometric type are complete, immersed into the tree-dimensional Euclidean space with finite total curvature and Gauss map extending to an oriented compact surface as a smooth branched covering map over the unit sphere of the Euclidean three dimensional space. In a recent preprint J. Jorge and F. Mercuri gave a geometric proof that the Gauss map can not omit three or more points if the immersion is minimal and no flat. Here we give a topological proof of this result in the class of no flat finite geometric type surfaces and also give a topological classification when the Gauss map is a regular covering map. This facts are easy applications of our main result, a generalization of the little Picard theorem for the class of branched covering of a finite geometric type surface into the unit sphere of the tree dimensional Euclidean space. A finite geometric type surface given by a compact surface minus a finite set of points has the following property: any branched covering from the surface to the unit Euclidean sphere having a extension to the compact surfaces can miss at most points. This is a generalization of the little Picard theorem to the class of finite geometric type surfaces.
1 Introduction
Finite geometric type surfaces was introduced in [1] as those immersions of a surface such that is complete in the induced metric and
is diffeomorphic to a compact oriented surface minus a finite set of points, , 2. 2.
the Gaussian curvature vanishes only at a finite number of points, 3. 3.
the Gauss map extends to a smooth branched covering, denoted by the same symbol, .
The points , or sometimes punctured neighborhoods of these points are called the ends on . The authors in [1] proved that the cardinality of is at most like the minimal case proved by Osserman [8]. In Jorge and Mercuri preprint [4] the authors shows that in the subclass of minimal immersions into of finite geometric type the number of missing points of the Gauss map is at most and this number is sharp. In the paper of L. Rodriguez [9] the author consider the classification of minimal immersions of finite geometric type that are embedded. He answer affirmatively a particular case of the following questions:
- (Q1)
Is the catenoid the only embedded one? 2. (Q2)
If the Gauss map of such surface omits two or more points, then must it be a covering of the catenoid? 3. (Q3)
If the Gaussian curvature is always strictly negative then must the surface be catenoid?
He proves the following result.
Theorem 1.1** ([9]).**
If the surface is minimal, embedded with Gaussian curvature strictly negative and of finite geometric type then it is the catenoid.
We will consider in this notes finite geometric type surfaces whose Gauss map omit two or more points and is a covering map, that is, the Gaussian curvature has no zeros. Before we go further let’s introduce the examples of [7] and [2]. In [7] the authors present examples of minimal immersions of whose image of Gauss map is exactly and of tori where the Gauss map image is In [2] there are examples of families into with the Gauss map omitting a par of antipodal points of for any genus. By other side we can bend a minimal immersion of finite geometric type preserving the cardinality of the set of omitted points by the Gauss map. If is a finite geometric type surface with non empty set , we define
[TABLE]
If take as one small ball inside the image of neighborhood of ends that are graphic over an unbounded annulus. In section (2) we prove that it is possible to bend to get new immersion satisfying the following.
Theorem 1**.**
Let be a finite geometric type surface with set of omitted points by the Gauss map of Then there is such that for each and with in the connected component of , exist one finite geometric type surface with Gauss map omitting exactly The surface is one bent of
Therefore it is possible to give only topological classification of finite geometric type surfaces. For example, assuming that the Gauss map of a finite geometric type surface is a covering map, or equivalently, the Gaussian curvature has no zero on our conclusion is the following.
Theorem 2**.**
Let be an non flat finite geometric type surface with the Gauss map a covering map. Then
There is no example if has tree points, 2. 2.
If has two points then is a covering map of 3. 3.
If has one point then is diffeomorphic to
The items and are manipulations of Riemann-Hurwirtz (RH) and total curvature (TC) formulas. The proof of item is included in the next result. In fact we give a topological prove of the same result of [4] but for the class of all no flat finite geometric type immersions. The idea follows like this. First we prove that the cardinality for any branched covering having a extension to a branched map (see theorem 2.4). Given a set it is possible to find a branched covering map of degree such that and for each the set has two points, one with order of branching [math] and the other with order and the induced map between the homotopy groups to is over (see lemma 2.2). Further, the map is a regular covering map. Then if is a finite geometric type surface and is a branched covering with and we can do a lifting of by to a new map having continuous extension to where and getting a contradiction with theorem 2.4. It is important to light lemma 2.2 is true only for with
In fact this generalize the little Picard theorem in the case the entire function is rational for a new class of surfaces and for branched covering (see §3 for details). We show that any branched covering map with continuous extension to can not miss more then points unless it is constant, without use of the conformal structure ( do not need to be holomorphic nor to be Riemann surfaces). A particular case is that the Gauss map of one finite geometric type surfaces can not miss or more points unless it is constant, generalizing the theorem of [4]. We get
Theorem 3** (Generalization of little Picard theorem).**
Let be a finite geometric type surface and be a non constant branched covering with finite fiber that has a extension to a branched covering Then \sharp\big{(}\mathbb{S}^{2}\setminus F(M)\big{)}\leq 2. In particular if is the Gauss map of and not flat then \sharp\big{(}\mathbb{S}^{2}\setminus G(M)\big{)}\leq 2.
In [7] the authors ask who are the embedded minimal surfaces of finite geometric type whose Gauss map misses two points (question Q1). The same question appear in Conjecture 17.0.33, item 3 of [6]. In §6 we present examples of Gauss maps that have not continuous extensions. Those examples should have at least one end with a missed point of and order of branch such that is not divided by (see §6).
2 Finite Geometric Type.
We will recall some facts about the behavior of an immersion of finite geometric type near the ends. Since the Gauss map is defined at a point , we have a tangent plane at , namely . It follows from the above properties that the image of the immersion of a small punctured neighborhood of projects (orthogonally) onto the complement of a disk in as a finite covering map of order . The number is called the geometric index of , see [3].
Since the branching points of , i.e. the points of zero Gaussian curvature and, possibly, the ends, are isolated, a punctured neighborhood of such a point is mapped onto its image, as a covering map of order . The number is called the branching number at . Observe that if is not a branching point then . We have the following topological relations:
RH (Riemann-Hurwirtz):
TC (Total curvature):
where is the Euler characteristic of , is the geometric index of and is the degree of the Gauss map (the cardinality of for almost all in the image).
The first relation is a well known fact in covering space theory. The second one was obtained, as an inequality, for the case of minimal surfaces, by Osserman [8] and in the above form, by Jorge and Meeks [3] (see also [1]).
The two relations RH and TC seems not to be enough to prove the sharp bound , but are enough to assert theorem 3 in the class of finite geometric type surfaces. We will use the following notations for one immersion of finite geometric type:
[TABLE]
Since is a branch covering we have
[TABLE]
Combining RH and TC we obtain the following theorem (see also [1])
Theorem 2.1**.**
If is a surface of finite geometric type, then
[TABLE]
If then In addition if and then , and all ends are embedded.
Proof.
Adding (RH) and (TC) we get
[TABLE]
Substituting equation (3) we get
[TABLE]
Hence
[TABLE]
proving that Now assume The (RH) and gives Using the (TC) we get
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
Then
[TABLE]
giving and if then and proving the result. ∎
Lemma 2.2**.**
Given three points of the points and the rational function
[TABLE]
then
[TABLE]
In particular if then
[TABLE]
is a regular covering map of degree and Fixed appropriated basics points we have that the map induced by between the fundamental groups and is over.
Reciprocally, given a branched covering and subsets , such that
The set of branching points of is a subset of , 2. 2.
h_{\star}\big{(}\pi_{1}(\mathbb{S}^{2}\setminus X)\big{)}=\pi_{1}\big{(}\mathbb{S}^{2}\setminus Y\big{)}**
then , an integer, , for all and We have splits with and
Further, if is the Möbius transform such that and where is defined by the choose then there is a diffeomorphism preserving fiber such that
Proof.
The function satisfy the conditions for and Since
[TABLE]
it follows that fulfill all conditions of the lemma. Since there is no more branch for unless and proving that is a regular covering. If is a small circle around then is a small closed curve around giving loops up to orientation. Hence the induced map between the first fundamental groups and satisfies
[TABLE]
where are generators. Since each point is image of a point with we get that all generators of belongs to , that is,
[TABLE]
completing one way of proof.
Assume now the existence of a branched covering and sets with the branchings of into the set such that h_{\star}\big{(}\pi_{1}(\mathbb{S}^{2}\setminus X)\big{)}=\pi_{1}\big{(}\mathbb{S}^{2}\setminus Y\big{)}. Set and the splits Hence send generator into generator implying that has a subset with having zero branching points. Then and . We have
[TABLE]
Subtracting the we get
[TABLE]
implying that and Choose a Möbius transform such that and Let be the the map of the first part of the lemma defined by If the map is a regular covering and is over.
Then we have two lifting of by and of by Since and we get implying that both are diffeomorphism and Then
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
implying that
[TABLE]
∎
Let and be disks without the center and and branched covering maps with one branching at the center of each disk of order and We consider and of class inside and continuous in The first homotopy group is an infinite cyclic group with generators . The existence of a continuous lift of by is equivalent to
[TABLE]
where the subindex means the induced group homomorphism between the fundamental groups. Since and the existence of is equivalent to have
[TABLE]
or yet
\textstyle{\tilde{D}_{1}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}$$\scriptstyle{z^{k}}$$\textstyle{D_{3}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}$$\scriptstyle{\zeta_{j}}$$\scriptstyle{z^{1+\beta_{F}}}$$\scriptstyle{\tilde{F}}$$\textstyle{D_{1}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}$$\scriptstyle{f}$$\textstyle{D_{2}}
Lemma 2.3**.**
Let and be disks without the center and and branched covering maps with one branching at the center of each disk of order and We consider and of class inside and continuous in Then there exist a continuous lifting iff
[TABLE]
In that case there exist a -root of such that and has the same differentiability of and
Proof.
We can assume that
[TABLE]
and where The existence of is equivalent to . Then the degree of is implying on the existence of a -root . This shows that is smooth once \zeta_{j}^{1+\beta_{F}}=\big{(}zQ_{1}(z)\big{)}^{1+\beta_{F}} and where is one deck transform. Then has the same differentiability of ∎
The next result is similar to theorem 2.1 but is a weak version of the little Picard’s theorem in the case of rational functions. It means that we can change the Gauss map with any other branched covering and the same conclusion about the number of missing points holds. It is consequence that (RH) and (TC) formulas are true for
Definition 2.1**.**
Let be a branching covering that has extension to . Let be the subset where this extension is made. If we define the order of the branching by
[TABLE]
where are small neighborhoods of the end endowed with the metric of by and the geodesic curvature with respect to this metric.
Theorem 2.4**.**
Let be a finite geometric type surface. Let be an at least branched covering map having extension to a branched covering map denoted by Then the (T-C) and (R-H) formulas holds
[TABLE]
In particular
[TABLE]
for .
Proof.
Set where is the set of ends of Consider Over take one appropriated such that:
All the balls are disjoints 2. 2.
The collection are disjoints topological annulus isolating the points of and if where are the connected component of
Set Observe that and is a regular covering map. If we endowed with the metric of we get
[TABLE]
where is the Gaussian curvature of and is the geodesic curvature of Hence
[TABLE]
If in some disk we have a metric where has no zeros, a straightforward calculation gives
[TABLE]
For isothermal parameter with and we get where is the geometric index of the end. Hence
[TABLE]
If then the metric has and
[TABLE]
Making we see that the TC formula holds for , or
[TABLE]
As we did before, if then once that extends to the branching and ends. Then
[TABLE]
In similar way the map the set of branching, is an immersion and we can do the pull back of the metric of by Following the proof of (16) we get
[TABLE]
where is the Gaussian curvature and is the geodesic curvature in the metric and is the metric of the sphere. The equations (21) and (22) holds and
[TABLE]
Hence
[TABLE]
The equation is true if Since this number is one integer and constant over it is the same over all Adding the TC and RH formulas for we get
[TABLE]
implying that as we wish. ∎
Remark 2.1**.**
Let a finite geometric type surface and a branched covering map with extension to and not empty set of missing points Assume there are a regular covering map such that
[TABLE]
Let the lifting of by
Question 1**.**
When the map can be extended continuously to ?
For all point where the map can be extended to one point in the fiber smoothly. For and with we need the condition given by lemma (2.3). If it do not happen there is no extension.
2.1 Proof of theorem 3.
Let be a finite geometric type surface and be a non constant branched covering with finite fiber that has a extension to a branched covering Set Y=\big{(}\mathbb{S}^{2}\setminus G(M)\big{)} and suppose that Hence it is possible to find satisfying (34) and proving the existence of the lifting of by and has continuous extension to . Since and we get a contradiction with theorem (2.4) proving the theorem 3.
3 The proof of theorem 1.
The space finite geometric type surfaces is closed for an operation of bending the ends. Take in FGT class with Gauss map and set of ends By [3] we can choose such that satisfies
- (i)
where is a neighborhood of each end in for all and all 2. (ii)
is a covering with fibre’s cardinality the geometric index for all and for all and all
Choose such that
[TABLE]
and all balls disjoints. There is such that
[TABLE]
Fix some and take where satisfies Now we are in position to bend the set to get a new immersion that just move to a point close to Choose some such that
[TABLE]
and Take a function with for and for Define by where is the angle between and and is the rotation of angle moving to Let be defined by if and for Since is proper the set K=f^{-1}\big{(}B_{R}^{\mathbb{R}^{2}}(0)\big{)} is compact in If we take small enough with no points with zero Gaussian curvature in the gluing area. Hence we have the following result.
Proposition 3.1**.**
Let a finite geometric type surface with projection and let be the bending constructed above. Let and be the respective Gauss maps. Then
* for all and * 2. 2.
* for all for any chose of * 3. 3.
if misses then misses 4. 4.
* for all * 5. 5.
the number of missing points of and are the same, 6. 6.
the geometric index of and are the same at each end, 7. 7.
the order of branching points of and are the same.
The above results proves Theorem 1.
4 Gauss map not branched: proof of theorem 2, items 2 and
Let a finite geometric type surface with of genus We can represent as one regular rectangle of of sides with boundary ordered by the relation The vertexes are identified and the sides and defining curves and , witch are generators of the fundamental group When we take we add more generators to the first fundamental group. From now on we assume that the Gauss map
[TABLE]
is a regular covering map, that is, there are no branching. In particular we have and The R-H formula gives
[TABLE]
or
[TABLE]
If then and proving item 3 of theorem 2. If we get proving item 2 of theorem 2.
5 New proof of a Lopes-Ros theorem.
In [5] the authors proved the following result.
Theorem 5.1** (Lopes-Ros, [5]).**
Let be a non flat complete minimal surface with finite total curvature and embedded. If then is a catenoid.
The original proof of this theorem use deformation of small pieces of under some special flow to get the conclusion. Theorem 3 implies this result easily. In fact, consider in some position that is the image of some end. Then we can consider and If is such that minimal embedded the map then is well defined and is a branched covering. By theorem 3 we get or is constant. Hence and classical results grantee that is a catenoid.
6 Remarks on Gauss map missing two points.
Let be a finite geometric type minimal surface whose Gauss map misses two points The existence of those examples are guarantee by [7] for genus and [2] for arbitrary genus but all are not embedded. Since the R-H formula gives
[TABLE]
where and Take , and the map of lemma (2.2) with Then is a regular covering and there is the lifting . By Remark 2.1 we have extension of to if and only if divides all But what is impossible by theorem 2.4. Then for those immersions we can not have continuous extensions for any no matter has.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] J. L. Barbosa, R. Fukuoka and F. Mercuri: Immersions of finite geometric type in Euclidean spaces. Annals of Global Analysis and Geometry vol. 22, 301-315 (2002)
- 2[2] E. S. Gama and L. P. Jorge: Complete minimal immersions of finite total curvature with Gauss map missing two points. , preprint.
- 3[3] L. P. Jorge and W. H. Meeks III: The topology of complete minimal surfaces of finite total Gaussian curvature. Topology, Vol. 22 N o 2, 203-221 (1983).
- 4[4] L.P. Jorge and F. Mercuri: The Gauss map of a complete non flat minimal surface in ℝ 3 superscript ℝ 3 \mathbb{R}^{3} with finite total curvature, preprint (2018).
- 5[5] Lopes and Ros F. J: On the Gauss map of complete minimal surfaces, J. Differential Geom. 33, No. 1, pages 293–300 (1991).
- 6[6] W. H. Meeks and J. Pérez: A survey on classical minimal surfaces theory.
- 7[7] Myaoka and Sato: On complete minimal surfaces whose Gauss map misses two directions Arch. Math., Vol. 63, 565-576 (1994).
- 8[8] R. Osserman: Global properties of minimal surfaces in 𝐄 𝟑 superscript 𝐄 3 {\bf E^{3}} and 𝐄 𝐧 . superscript 𝐄 𝐧 {\bf E^{n}}. Annals of Mathematics, Vol. 80, 340-364 (1964).
