# Measurement of $\bar{\nu}_{\mu}$ charged-current single $\pi^{-}$   production on hydrocarbon in the few-GeV region using MINERvA

**Authors:** T. Le, F. Akbar, L. Aliaga, D.A. Andrade, M. V. Ascencio, A. Bashyal,, A. Bercellie, M. Betancourt, A. Bodek, J. L. Bonilla, A. Bravar, H. Budd, G., Caceres, T. Cai, M.F. Carneiro, D. Coplowe, S.A. Dytman, G.A. D\'iaz, 5 J., Felix, L. Fields, A. Filkins, R. Fine, N. Fiza, A.M. Gago, H. Gallagher, A., Ghosh, R. Gran, D.A. Harris, S. Henry, S. Jena, J. Kleykamp, M. Kordosky, D., Last, X.-G. Lu, E. Maher, S. Manly, W.A. Mann, C. Mauger, K.S. McFarland,, A.M. McGowan, B. Messerly, J. Miller, J.G. Morf\'in, D. Naples, J.K. Nelson,, C. Nguyen, A. Norrick, Nuruzzaman, A. Olivier, V. Paolone, G.N. Perdue, M.A., Ram\'irez, R.D. Ransome, H. Ray, D. Rimal, D. Ruterbories, H. Schellman, J.T., Sobczyk, C.J. Solano Salinas, H. Su, M. Sultana, V.S. Syrotenko, E. Valencia,, M.Wospakrik, B. Yaeggy, and L. Zazueta

arXiv: 1906.08300 · 2019-09-25

## TL;DR

This paper measures antineutrino-induced single pion production on hydrocarbon in the 1.5 to 10 GeV range using MINERvA, comparing results with simulations and performing isospin analysis to deepen understanding of neutrino interactions.

## Contribution

It provides detailed differential cross sections for antineutrino charged-current single pion production and performs an isospin decomposition, comparing data with multiple event generator predictions.

## Key findings

- GENIE overestimates cross sections by 8%
- GiBUU underestimates cross sections by 10%
- Results agree with historical bubble chamber data

## Abstract

The antineutrino scattering channel $\bar{\nu}_{\mu} \,\text{CH} \rightarrow \mu^{+} \,\pi^{-} \,X$(nucleon(s)) is analyzed in the incident energy range 1.5 to 10 GeV using the MINERvA detector at Fermilab. Differential cross sections are reported as functions of $\mu^{+}$ momentum and production angle, $\pi^{-}$ kinetic energy and production angle, and antineutrino energy and squared four-momentum transfer. Distribution shapes are generally reproduced by simulations based on the GENIE, NuWro, and GiBUU event generators, however GENIE (GiBUU) overestimates (underestimates) the cross-section normalizations by 8% (10%). Comparisons of data with the GENIE-based reference simulation probe conventional treatments of cross sections and pion intranuclear rescattering. The distribution of non-track vertex energy is used to decompose the signal sample into reaction categories, and cross sections are determined for the exclusive reactions $\mu^{+} \pi^{-} n$ and $ \mu^+ \pi^{-} p$. A similar treatment applied to the published MINERvA sample $\bar{\nu}_{\mu} \,\text{CH} \rightarrow \mu^{+} \,\pi^{0} \,X$(nucleon(s)) has determined the $\mu^{+} \pi^{0} n$ cross section, and the latter is used with $\sigma(\pi^{-} n)$ and $\sigma(\pi^{-} p)$ to carry out an isospin decomposition of $\bar{\nu}_{\mu}$-induced CC($\pi$). The ratio of magnitudes and relative phase for isospin amplitudes $A_{3}$ and $A_{1}$ thereby obtained are: $R^{\bar{\nu}} = 0.99 \pm 0.19$ and $\phi^{\bar{\nu}} = 93^{\circ} \pm 7^{\circ}$. Our results are in agreement with bubble chamber measurements made four decades ago.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.08300/full.md

## Figures

29 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.08300/full.md

## References

88 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.08300/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.08300