# Minimal Surfaces and Weak Gravity

## TL;DR

This paper demonstrates that the Weak Gravity Conjecture imposes upper bounds on minimal cycle volumes in string compactifications, revealing significant cycle recombination effects and their implications for non-BPS instantons.

## Contribution

It provides the first explicit example showing how the WGC constrains minimal cycle volumes and highlights the importance of non-BPS instantons in string theory compactifications.

## Key findings

- Upper bounds on minimal cycle volumes derived from the WGC.
- Explicit example of cycle recombination reducing volume significantly.
- Non-BPS instantons dominate over BPS instantons in certain regimes.

## Abstract

We show that the Weak Gravity Conjecture (WGC) implies a nontrivial upper bound on the volumes of the minimal-volume cycles in certain homology classes that admit no calibrated representatives. In compactification of type IIB string theory on an orientifold $X$ of a Calabi-Yau threefold, we consider a homology class $[\Sigma] \in H_4(X,\mathbb{Z})$ represented by a union $\Sigma_{\cup}$ of holomorphic and antiholomorphic cycles. The instanton form of the WGC applied to the axion charge $[\Sigma]$ implies an upper bound on the action of a non-BPS Euclidean D3-brane wrapping the minimal-volume representative $\Sigma_{\mathrm{min}}$ of $[\Sigma]$. We give an explicit example of an orientifold $X$ of a hypersurface in a toric variety, and a hyperplane $\mathcal{H} \subset H_4(X,\mathbb{Z})$, such that for any $[\Sigma] \in H$ that satisfies the WGC, the minimal volume obeys $\mathrm{Vol}(\Sigma_{\mathrm{min}}) \ll \mathrm{Vol}(\Sigma_{\cup})$: the holomorphic and antiholomorphic components recombine to form a much smaller cycle. In particular, the sub-Lattice WGC applied to $X$ implies large recombination, no matter how sparse the sublattice. Non-BPS instantons wrapping $\Sigma_{\mathrm{min}}$ are then more important than would be predicted from a study of BPS instantons wrapping the separate components of $\Sigma_{\cup}$. Our analysis hinges on a novel computation of effective divisors in $X$ that are not inherited from effective divisors of the toric variety.