Some summation theorems for truncated Clausen series and applications
M.I. Qureshi, Saima Jabee, Dilshad Ahamad

TL;DR
This paper derives new summation theorems for truncated Clausen hypergeometric series with specific parameter conditions and applies these results to obtain Mellin transforms involving Goursat's truncated hypergeometric function.
Contribution
It introduces novel summation theorems for truncated Clausen series with negative integer parameters and applies them to Mellin transforms of related functions.
Findings
New summation theorems for truncated Clausen series
Explicit Mellin transforms involving Goursat's hypergeometric function
Enhanced understanding of hypergeometric series with negative parameters
Abstract
The main aim of this paper is to derive some new summation theorems for terminating and truncated Clausen's hypergeometric series with unit argument, when one numerator parameter and one denominator parameter are negative integers. Further, using our truncated summation theorems, we obtain the Mellin transforms of the product of exponential function and Goursat's truncated hypergeometric function.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematical functions and polynomials · Advanced Mathematical Identities · Mathematics and Applications
Some summation theorems for truncated Clausen series and applications
M.I. Qureshi, Saima Jabee*∗* and Dilshad Ahamad
M.I. Qureshi: Department of Applied Sciences and Humanities, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Jamia Millia Islamia (A Central University), New Delhi 110025, India.
Saima Jabee: Department of Applied Sciences and Humanities, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Jamia Millia Islamia (A Central University), New Delhi 110025, India.
Dilshad Ahamad: Department of Applied Sciences and Humanities, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Jamia Millia Islamia (A Central University), New Delhi 110025, India.
Abstract.
The main aim of this paper is to derive some new summation theorems for terminating and truncated Clausen’s hypergeometric series with unit argument, when one numerator parameter and one denominator parameter are negative integers. Further, using our truncated summation theorems, we obtain the Mellin transforms of the product of exponential function and Goursat’s truncated hypergeometric function.
Key words and phrases:
Watson summation theorem; Whipple summation theorem; Dixon summation theorem; Saalschütz summation theorem; Truncated series; Hypergeometric summation theorems; Mellin transforms.
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
33C05, 33C20, 44A10.
*Corresponding author
1. Introduction
In our investigations, we shall use the following standard notations:
; ; .
The symbols , , , , and denote the sets of complex numbers, real numbers, natural numbers, integers, positive and negative real numbers respectively.
The Pochhammer symbol ([16, p.22 eq(1), p.32 Q.N.(8) and Q.N.(9)], see also [18, p.23, eq(22) and eq(23)]), is defined by
[TABLE]
it being understood conventionally that and assumed tacitly that the Gamma quotient exists.
The generalized hypergeometric function ([16, Art.44, pp.73-74], see also [1]), is defined by
[TABLE]
By convention, a product over the empty set is unity.
\big{(}p,q\in\mathbb{N}_{0};~{}p\leqq{q+1}~{};~{}p\leqq{q}~{}\text{and}~{}|z|<\infty;\big{.} ~{}\big{.}p=q+1~{}\text{and}~{}|z|<1;~{}p=q+1,|z|=1~{}\text{and}~{}\Re(\omega)>0;~{}p=q+1,|z|=1,z\neq 1~{}\text{and}~{}-1<\Re(\omega)\leq 0\big{)},
where
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
where denotes the real part of complex number throughout the paper.
A finite series identity (reversal of the order of terms in finite summation) is given by
[TABLE]
The truncated hypergeometric series is given by:
[TABLE]
where ; , and
[TABLE]
with similar interpretation for others.
The terminating hypergeometric series (the hypergeometric polynomial) is given by
[TABLE]
where and .
If ; , then series {{}_{3}}F_{2}\left[\begin{array}[]{r}-m,\alpha,\beta;\\ {}\hfil\\ -\ell,\gamma;\end{array}\ z\right] is an infinite series and is given by the following series representation (see for example [10, p.41, eq.(3.1.26); p.42, eq.(3.2.6)] and [12, p.438, eq.(7.2.3.5)])
[TABLE]
In original notation, the higher order Goursat hypergeometric function is represented by double integral [5, p. 286]. So we have
[TABLE]
where , ,
and
[TABLE]
where and .
It is also well known that, under certain conditions, the Goursat’s function [5, p. 286] is defined by
[TABLE]
where and is Kummer’s confluent hypergeometric function.
An integral transform that may be considered as the multiplicative form of the two-sided Laplace transform is known as Mellin transform, which is closely related to the Fourier transform, Laplace transform and other transforms. The Mellin transform is defined by
[TABLE]
where is a complex variable, above integral exists with suitable convergence conditions.
Until 1990, only few classical summation theorems for and were known. Subsequently, some progress has been made in generalizing these classical summation theorems (see [6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 14, 15]).
2. Summation theorems for non-terminating, terminating and truncated clausen series
In this section, we have verified the following terminating and truncated Clausen summation theorems by taking suitable values of parameters. So, without any loss of convergence, we can relax convergence conditions in some cases.
The classical Watson’s summation theorem for non-terminating Clausen’s hypergeometric series of unit argument [1, p.16, section 3.3(1)] takes the form
[TABLE]
provided and parameters are adjusted in such a way that the series on the left-hand side is well defined.
When in equation (2.3), we get a Watson’s summation theorem for terminating hypergeometric series (containing (2m+1)-terms)
[TABLE]
where ; .
When in equation (2.3), we get another Watson’s summation theorem for terminating hypergeometric series (containing-(2m+2) terms)
[TABLE]
where ; .
We recall a Watson’s summation theorem for truncated Clausen’s series (containing (m+1)-terms) [2, p.238, eq(2.2)]
[TABLE]
where .
On setting in equation (2.6), we obtain Watson’s summation theorem for truncated Clausen’s series (containing-(2m+1) terms) is given by
[TABLE]
where .
On setting in equation (2.9), we obtain another Watson’s summation theorem for truncated Clausen’s series (containing-(2m+2) terms) is given by
[TABLE]
where .
The following summation theorem for Clausen’s non-terminating series due to Saalschütz’s ([1, p.21,section 3.8(2)], [12, p.534, Entry 12], see also [17, p.73(2.4.4.4) and p.246(III.31)]) is given by
[TABLE]
where and .
If we set , being positive integer, in the right-hand side of equation (2.21), we obtain Saalschütz’s summation theorem for Clausen’s terminating series ([1, p.9, section 2.2(1)], see also [16, p.87, Th 29])
[TABLE]
where .
On setting in equation (2.27), we get Saalschütz’s summation theorem for truncated series
[TABLE]
where .
Next we recall another Saalschütz’s summation theorem for Clausen’s terminating series ([2, p.24], see also [16, p.87, Theorem 30])
[TABLE]
where .
If we set in equation (2.33), we obtain the following Saalschütz’s summation theorem for truncated series
[TABLE]
where .
Next we recall Whipple’s summation theorem for non-terminating Clausen’s series [1, p.16, section 3.4(1)]
[TABLE]
where .
On setting in equation (2.39), we get Whipple’s summation theorem for terminating series
[TABLE]
where ; .
On setting in equation (2.39), we get another Whipple’s summation theorem for terminating series
[TABLE]
where ; .
Another Whipple’s summation theorem for Clausen’s terminating series is given by ([13, p. 157, eq(3.1)], see also [3, p. 190, eq(2)] and [2, p. 238, eq(3.1)])
[TABLE]
where ; .
If we set in equation (2.49), we get Whipple summation theorem for truncated series containing (m+1)-terms
[TABLE]
where .
On setting in equation (2.43), we get Whipple summation theorem for truncated series containing (2m+1)-terms
[TABLE]
where .
On setting in equation (2.43), we get Whipple summation theorem for truncated series containing (2m+1)-terms
[TABLE]
where .
If we set in equation (2.46), we get Whipple summation theorem for truncated series containing (2m+2)-terms
[TABLE]
where .
If we set in equation (2.46), we get Whipple summation theorem for truncated series containing (2m+2)-terms
[TABLE]
where .
The classical Dixon’s summation theorem for Clausen’s non-terminating series [1, p.13, section 3.1(1)] is given by
[TABLE]
where .
Equation (2.70) can be written as
[TABLE]
On setting in equation (2.70), we obtain Dixon’s summation theorem for terminating series
[TABLE]
where .
On setting in equation (2.70), we obtain another Dixon’s summation theorem for terminating series
[TABLE]
where .
On setting in equation (2.79), we obtain Dixon’s summation theorem for truncated series
[TABLE]
where .
On setting in equation (2.85), we obtain another Dixon’s summation theorem for truncated series
[TABLE]
where .
On setting in equation (2.82), we obtain Dixon’s summation theorem for truncated series
[TABLE]
where .
On setting in equation (2.91), we obtain another Dixon’s summation theorem for truncated series
[TABLE]
where .
On setting in equation (2.70), we obtain Dixon’s summation theorem for terminating series
[TABLE]
where .
On setting in equation (2.70), we obtain another Dixon’s summation theorem for terminating series
[TABLE]
where .
On setting in equation (2.97), we obtain Dixon’s summation theorem for truncated series
[TABLE]
where .
On setting in equation (2.100), we obtain another Dixon’s summation theorem for truncated series
[TABLE]
where .
Also, on setting in equation (2.74), we obtain Dixon’s theorem for Clausen’s terminating series
[TABLE]
where .
On setting in equation (2.70), we get Dixon’s summation theorem for Clausen’s terminating series
[TABLE]
where .
In section 3, we discuss the applications of some summation theorems for truncated Clausen hypergeometric series in Mellin transforms of the product of exponential function and truncated Goursat hypergeometric function.
3. Applications in Mellin transforms
In this section, we obtain Mellin transforms of the product of exponential function and truncated Goursat’s function (when one numerator and one denominator parameters are negative integers),
[TABLE]
where ; and .
We derive some new results for Mellin transform as applications of summation theorems discussed in previous section.
Case I. On setting and in equation (3.8) and using Watson’s truncated summation theorem (2.12), we obtain
[TABLE]
where ; ; .
Case II. Replacing by and after that setting and in equation (3.8) and using Watson’s truncated summation theorem (2.15), we obtain
[TABLE]
where .
Case III. Replacing by and after that setting and in equation (3.8) and using Watson’s truncated summation theorem (2.18), we obtain
[TABLE]
where .
Case IV. On setting and in equation (3.8) and using Saalschütz’s truncated summation theorem (2.30), we obtain
[TABLE]
where .
Case V. On setting and in equation (3.8) and using Saalschütz’s truncated summation theorem (2.36), we obtain
[TABLE]
where .
Case VI. On setting and in equation (3.8) and using Whipple’s truncated summation theorem (2.52), we obtain
[TABLE]
where and .
Case VII. Replacing by and after that setting and in equation (3.8) and using Whipple’s truncated summation theorem (2.55), we obtain
[TABLE]
where and .
Case VIII. Replacing by and after that setting and in equation (3.8) and using Whipple’s truncated summation theorem (2.58), we obtain
[TABLE]
where and .
Case IX. Replacing by and after that setting and in equation (3.8) and using Whipple’s truncated summation theorem (2.62), we obtain
[TABLE]
where and .
Case X. Replacing by and after that setting and in equation (3.8) and using Whipple’s truncated summation theorem (2.66), we obtain
[TABLE]
where and .
Case XI. Replacing by and after that setting and in equation (3.8) and using Dixon’s truncated summation theorem (2.85), we obtain
[TABLE]
where and .
Case XII. Replacing by and after that setting and in equation (3.8) and using Dixon’s truncated summation theorem (2.88), we obtain
[TABLE]
where and .
Case XIII. Replacing by and after that setting and in equation (3.8) and using Dixon’s truncated summation theorem (2.91), we obtain
[TABLE]
where and .
Case XIV. Replacing by and after that setting and in equation (3.8) and using Dixon’s truncated summation theorem (2.94), we obtain
[TABLE]
where and .
Case XV. Replacing by and after that setting and in equation (3.8) and using Dixon’s truncated summation theorem (2.103), we obtain
[TABLE]
where and .
Case XVI. Replacing by and after that setting and in equation (3.8) and using Dixon’s truncated summation theorem (2.106), we obtain
[TABLE]
where and .
Remark. In the next communication [19], we shall obtain the Mellin transform of the product of exponential function and infinite Goursat series {{}_{2}F_{2}}\left[\begin{array}[]{r}-m,\alpha;\\ -m-\ell,\beta;\end{array}\lambda t\right].
Concluding remarks
In previous sections, we have derived some summation theorems for Clausen’s terminating and truncated hypergeometric series when one numerator and one denominator parameters are negative integers. In the sequel of this paper, we have derived some summation formulae for Gauss’ hypergeometric series , Clausen hypergeometric series and have discussed their applications (see for example [19, 20]). It is expected that these summation formulae will be of wide interest and will help to advance research in the field of special functions.
We conclude our present investigation by observing that several hypergeometric summation theorems can be derived from a known summation theorem in an analogous manner.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Bailey W. N.; Generalized Hypergeometric Series , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1935; Reprinted by Stechert Hafner, New York, 1964.
- 2[2] Bailey W. N.; On the sum of a terminating F 2 3 subscript subscript 𝐹 2 3 {{}_{3}}F_{2} , Quart. J. Math. Oxford(2) , 4 (1953), 237-240.
- 3[3] Dzhrbashyan V. A.; On a theorem of Whipple, Zh. Vych. Mat. , 4(2) (1964), 348-351.
- 4[4] Erd e ´ ´ 𝑒 \acute{e} lyi A., Magnus W., Oberhettinger F. and Tricomi F.G.; Tables of Integral Transforms , Vol. I , Mc Graw-Hill Book Company, New York, Toronto and London, 1954.
- 5[5] Goursat E.; M e ´ ´ 𝑒 \acute{e} moire sur les fonctions hyperg e ´ ´ 𝑒 \acute{e} om e ´ ´ 𝑒 \acute{e} triques d’ordre sup e ´ ´ 𝑒 \acute{e} rieur, Ann. Sci. E ´ ´ 𝐸 \acute{E} cole Norm. Sup. (Ser 2) , 12 (1883), 261-286.
- 6[6] Kim Y. S., Rakha M. A. and Rathie A. K., Extensions of certain classical summation theorems for the series F 1 2 subscript subscript 𝐹 1 2 {{}_{2}}F_{1} , F 2 3 subscript subscript 𝐹 2 3 {{}_{3}}F_{2} and F 3 4 subscript subscript 𝐹 3 4 {{}_{4}}F_{3} with applications in Ramanujan summations, Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. , 26 pages (2010).
- 7[7] Lavoie J. L., Grondin F., and Rathie A. K., Generalizations of Watson’s theorem on the sum of a F 2 3 subscript subscript 𝐹 2 3 {{}_{3}}F_{2} , Indian J. Math. , 34 (1992) 23-32.
- 8[8] Lavoie J. L., Grondin F., and Rathie A. K., Generalizations of Dixon’s theorem on the sum of a F 2 3 subscript subscript 𝐹 2 3 {{}_{3}}F_{2} , Math. Comp. , 62 (1994) 267-276.
