Bayesian fusion and multimodal DCM for EEG and fMRI

TL;DR

This paper demonstrates that Bayesian fusion of EEG and fMRI data within a dynamic causal model improves the estimation of brain connectivity by leveraging the complementary strengths of both modalities, using synthetic data for validation.

Contribution

It introduces a Bayesian fusion approach that uses EEG-derived priors to enhance fMRI DCM analysis, showing improved model evidence and parameter estimation accuracy.

Findings

Bayesian fusion improves model evidence over fMRI alone.

EEG data enhances estimates of haemodynamic parameters.

Multimodal fusion exploits complementary temporal and spatial information.

Abstract

This paper asks whether integrating multimodal EEG and fMRI data offers a better characterisation of functional brain architectures than either modality alone. This evaluation rests upon a dynamic causal model that generates both EEG and fMRI data from the same neuronal dynamics. We introduce the use of Bayesian fusion to provide informative (empirical) neuronal priors - derived from dynamic causal modelling (DCM) of EEG data - for subsequent DCM of fMRI data. To illustrate this procedure, we generated synthetic EEG and fMRI timeseries for a mismatch negativity (or auditory oddball) paradigm, using biologically plausible model parameters (i.e., posterior expectations from a DCM of empirical, open access, EEG data). Using model inversion, we found that Bayesian fusion provided a substantial improvement in marginal likelihood or model evidence, indicating a more efficient estimation of model parameters, in relation to inverting fMRI data alone. We quantified the benefits of multimodal fusion with the information gain pertaining to neuronal and haemodynamic parameters - as measured by the Kullback-Leibler divergence between their prior and posterior densities. Remarkably, this analysis suggested that EEG data can improve estimates of haemodynamic parameters; thereby furnishing proof-of-principle that Bayesian fusion of EEG and fMRI is necessary to resolve conditional dependencies between neuronal and haemodynamic estimators. These results suggest that Bayesian fusion may offer a useful approach that exploits the complementary temporal (EEG) and spatial (fMRI) precision of different data modalities. We envisage the procedure could be applied to any multimodal dataset that can be explained by a DCM with a common neuronal parameterisation.