Constant coefficient Laurent biorthogonal polynomials, Riordan arrays and moment sequences
Paul Barry

TL;DR
This paper investigates constant coefficient Laurent biorthogonal polynomials through Riordan arrays, revealing their properties, related orthogonal polynomials, and explicit formulas for moments and expansions.
Contribution
It provides new closed-form expressions and detailed analysis of Laurent biorthogonal polynomials and their connections to Riordan arrays and moment sequences.
Findings
Explicit formulas for Laurent biorthogonal polynomials
Relationships between moments of different polynomial families
Connections to T-fraction expansions
Abstract
We study properties of constant coefficient Laurent biorthogonal polynomials using Riordan arrays. We give details of related orthogonal polynomials, and we explore relationships between the moments of these orthogonal polynomials, the moments of the defining Laurent biorthogonal polynomials, and the expansions of -fractions. Closed form expressions are given for the polynomials and their moments.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Combinatorial Mathematics · Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research · Nonlinear Waves and Solitons
Constant coefficient Laurent biorthogonal polynomials, Riordan arrays and moment sequences
Paul Barry
School of Science
Waterford Institute of Technology
Ireland
Abstract
We study properties of constant coefficient Laurent biorthogonal polynomials using Riordan arrays. We give details of related orthogonal polynomials, and we explore relationships between the moments of these orthogonal polynomials, the moments of the defining Laurent biorthogonal polynomials, and the expansions of -fractions. Closed form expressions are given for the polynomials and their moments.
1 Introduction
Let and for be arbitrary nonzero constants. The monic Laurent biorthogonal polynomials (LBPs) [2, 4, 10], defined by the sequences and , is the sequence of polynomials determined by the recurrence
[TABLE]
with . The LBP is a monic polynomial in of exact degree of which the constant term does not vanish. This note will be concerned with the constant coefficient case, that is, we assume that and .
We let , and we call the lower triangular matrix the coefficient array of the family of LBPs . In the case that the defining sequences are constant ( and ) we have the following result [2].
Proposition 1**.**
The coefficient array of the family of LBPs defined by
[TABLE]
with is given by the Riordan array [8]
[TABLE]
The Riordan array has been called a generalized Delannoy matrix [9]. We recall that the Riordan array , where
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
is the matrix with general -th term given by
[TABLE]
Here, is the functional which extracts the coefficient of [6].
From the above proposition, we have the following results.
Corollary 2**.**
We have the following generating function for the family in the case of constant coefficients.
[TABLE]
Proof.
The result follows since the bivariate generating function of the Riordan array is given by
[TABLE]
∎
Corollary 3**.**
We have
[TABLE]
Proof.
We have , where is given by
[TABLE]
Expanding this by the method of coefficients [6] leads to the desired expression. ∎
It is appropriate to call the inverse of the matrix the moment matrix of the LBPs , and to designate the elements of its first column as the moments. We then have
Proposition 4**.**
The moments of the LBPs have generating function
[TABLE]
where
[TABLE]
is the generating function of the Catalan numbers A000108.
Proof.
In effect, the inverse of the Riordan array is given by
[TABLE]
∎
Corollary 5**.**
We have
[TABLE]
where is the -th Catalan number.
The moments begin
[TABLE]
Corollary 6**.**
We have
[TABLE]
Proof.
We solve for where
[TABLE]
Then we have . ∎
Corollary 7**.**
We have
[TABLE]
Corollary 8**.**
The Hankel transform of the moments is given by
[TABLE]
Proof.
This follows from Heilermann’s formula [5] since the coefficients of are
[TABLE]
∎
Corollary 9**.**
The moments of the LBPs defined by
[TABLE]
with , are also the moments for the family of orthogonal polynomials whose coefficient array is given by the Riordan array
[TABLE]
Proof.
Calculation shows that the inverse of the above Riordan array is
[TABLE]
∎
The orthogonal polynomials satisfy
[TABLE]
with
[TABLE]
For an exposition of the links between Riordan arrays and orthogonal polynomials, see [1].
We finish this section by noting that we can use Lagrange inversion [7] to determine the elements of the inverse coefficient matrix . We obtain the following result.
Proposition 10**.**
The -th element of the inverse of the coefficient matrix is given by
[TABLE]
Setting in this expression (which gives us the first column), we obtain that and
[TABLE]
for .
2 T-fractions and Toeplitz determinants
We begin this section by considering the -fraction [3]
[TABLE]
Solving the equation
[TABLE]
for , we see that
[TABLE]
This expands to give the sequence that begins
[TABLE]
We have
[TABLE]
Proposition 11**.**
The generating function is the generating function of the moments of the family of orthogonal polynomials whose coefficient array is given by the Riordan array
[TABLE]
Proof.
By the theory of Riordan arrays, the generating function of the first column of the inverse matrix is equal to . ∎
The orthogonal polynomials satisfy the recurrence
[TABLE]
with
[TABLE]
Proposition 12**.**
We have
[TABLE]
.
Proof.
The matrix with general -th term is the Riordan array . Applying this Riordan array to the generating function
[TABLE]
of the sequence , we obtain the generating function
[TABLE]
of . ∎
Corollary 13**.**
We have
[TABLE]
The theory of LBPs is tied to that of -fractions and Toeplitz determinants. In order to define the relevant Toeplitz matrices and determinants in our case, we must extend the moments to a bi-infinite sequence . We do this as follows. We extend to by setting
[TABLE]
We let
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
The theory of LBPs now gives us the following results.
Proposition 14**.**
We have
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
The Toeplitz transform of the moments of the LBPs is given by
[TABLE]
The polynomials are given by
[TABLE]
3 Examples
Example 15**.**
In this example, we consider the case where . By solving the equations
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
and comparing and , we see that the two continued fractions
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
are equal. Their common expansion begins
[TABLE]
As a sequence of polynomials in , the corresponding coefficient array begins
[TABLE]
This is triangle A060693, with general term , which counts the number of Schroeder paths from to with peaks. We have in this case
[TABLE]
The above theory tells us that the sequence is the moment sequence for the orthogonal polynomials with coefficient array given by the Riordan array
[TABLE]
The corresponding LBP moment sequence , which begins
[TABLE]
is given by the first column of the inverse of the Riordan array
[TABLE]
It is also given by the first column of the inverse of
[TABLE]
The link to Schroeder numbers is evident by taking . In that case, we have
[TABLE]
the -th large Schroeder number A006318. In this case the numbers begin
[TABLE]
while the LBP sequence begins
[TABLE]
By varying the parameter , we find interpretations in terms of Schroeder paths where the level steps can have colors.
Example 16**.**
Given a Riordan array , the matrix is called its production matrix, where denotes the matrix with its top row removed. For the LBP array , its production matrix begins
[TABLE]
This displays a structural property of Riordan arrays: after the first column, all columns have the same elements, apart from the descending zeros.
We now take an example with non-constant . Thus we let be the sequence that begins
[TABLE]
while we take . Then the moment matrix corresponding to the LBPs given by
[TABLE]
with , begins
[TABLE]
This array has a production matrix which begins
[TABLE]
This illustrates that the moment array is not a Riordan array; nevertheless, the production matrix does reflect the periodicity in the defining parameters.
The sequence A155867, which begins
[TABLE]
is given by
[TABLE]
Example 17**.**
In this example, we consider the moments in the case where . Thus we look at the first column of the matrix . The moments begin
[TABLE]
This sequence of polynomials in has a coefficient array that begins
[TABLE]
The second column is composed of the alternating sign Catalan numbers, while the diagonal is given by the augmented large Schroeder numbers. The general -th element of this matrix is given by
[TABLE]
so that the moments in this case are give by
[TABLE]
The row sums of the matrix above are all equal to . In this case, the Riordan array becomes , which is the binomial matrix with an all s first column.
The unsigned matrix
[TABLE]
corresponds to the case . Its row sums begin
[TABLE]
The sequence is the expansion of the reversion of , A103210.
Example 18**.**
When , we are dealing with the matrix , which begins
[TABLE]
The coefficients are those of the signed Delannoy triangle A008288. In this case, the inverse or moment matrix begins
[TABLE]
In this case, the moments are the scaled large Schroeder numbers .
4 Relations between the Riordan arrays
We let
[TABLE]
be the coefficient matrix of the LBPs . We recall that we have
[TABLE]
with . The LBP moments are then the elements of the first column of . We let
[TABLE]
This is the coefficient array of the family of orthogonal polynomials which satisfies the recurrence
[TABLE]
with . The LBP moments are given by the elements of the first column of .
We also let
[TABLE]
This is the coefficient matrix of the family of orthogonal polynomials that satisfy the recurrence
[TABLE]
with . The moments are given by the elements of the first column of . Finally, we let
[TABLE]
be the generalized binomial matrix with general -th element . We have .
Proposition 19**.**
We have
[TABLE]
Proof.
We have where . The first element of the product above is then given by
[TABLE]
Similarly the second element is given by
[TABLE]
∎
Corollary 20**.**
We have
[TABLE]
Proof.
The general element of the Riordan array is . ∎
This provides a Riordan array interpretation of the links between the constant coefficient Laurent biorthogonal polynomials and the orthogonal polynomials defined by the coefficient matrix .
Proposition 21**.**
We have
[TABLE]
Corollary 22**.**
We have
[TABLE]
We can thus say that the LBP polynomials are the -th binomial transform of the orthogonal polynomials . The relationship between the polynomials and is governed by the following result.
Proposition 23**.**
We have
[TABLE]
We can find a relationship between the LBP matrix and the simpler orthogonal polynomial coefficient array . This is the array of the family of orthogonal polynomials that satisfy
[TABLE]
with .
Proposition 24**.**
We have
[TABLE]
We conclude from this that
[TABLE]
5 Conclusions
The structure of Laurent biorthogonal polynomials defined by constant coefficients are fully defined by the properties of the generalized Delannoy matrix given by the Riordan array . By means of Riordan array analysis, we can show them to be the binomial transform of a related family of orthogonal polynomials. These constant coefficient Laurent biorthogonal polynomials can be defined by -fractions which are related to colored Schroeder paths. In particular, the moments of these LBP polynomials count Schroeder paths with colored horizontal and down steps (where the colors are the same for each level).
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] P. Barry and A. Mwafise, Classical and semi-classical orthogonal polynomials defined by Riordan arrays, and their moment sequences, J. Integer Seq. , 21 (2018), Article 18.1.5, 40 pages.
- 2[2] P. Barry, Laurent biorthogonal polynomials and Riordan arrays, ar Xiv:1311.2292 v 1, 2013
- 3[3] W. B. Jones and W. B. Thron, Continued Fractions. Analytic Theory and Applications , Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, 11, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, Mass., 1980.
- 4[4] S. Kamioka, Laurent polynomials, q 𝑞 q -Narayana polynomials and domino tilings of the Aztec diamonds, Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A , 123 (2014), 14–29.
- 5[5] C. Krattenthaler, Advanced determinant calculus: A complement, Linear Algebra Appl. 411 (2005), 68–-166.
- 6[6] D. Merlini, R. Sprugnoli and M. C. Verri, The Method of Coefficients, Amer. Math. Monthly , 114 (2007), 40–57.
- 7[7] D. Merlini, R. Sprugnoli, and M. C. Verri, Lagrange inversion: when and how, Acta Appl. Math. , 94 (2006), 233–249.
- 8[8] L. W. Shapiro, S. Getu, W.-J. Woan, and L.C. Woodson, The Riordan Group, Discr. Appl. Math. 34 (1991), 229–239.
