Gauss' lemma for polynomials over semidomains
Peyman Nasehpour

TL;DR
This paper extends Gauss' lemma, a fundamental result in polynomial factorization, to the broader context of subtractive factorial semidomains, expanding its applicability in algebraic structures.
Contribution
The paper introduces a generalization of Gauss' lemma specifically for polynomials over subtractive factorial semidomains, a novel algebraic setting.
Findings
Gauss' lemma is valid in subtractive factorial semidomains
Extension of polynomial factorization principles to new algebraic structures
Potential applications in algebra and number theory
Abstract
In this paper, we generalize Gauss' lemma for polynomials over subtractive factorial semidomains.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems · Functional Equations Stability Results · Meromorphic and Entire Functions
Gauss’ lemma for polynomials over semidomains
Peyman Nasehpour
Department of Engineering Science
Golpayegan University of Technology
Golpayegan
Iran
[email protected], [email protected]
Abstract.
In this paper, we generalize Gauss’ lemma for polynomials over subtractive factorial semidomains.
Key words and phrases:
Gauss’ lemma, content of polynomials, semidomains
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
16Y60, 13A15.
0. Introduction
In this paper, by a semiring, we understand an algebraic structure, consisting of a nonempty set with two operations of addition and multiplication such that the following conditions are satisfied:
- (1)
is a commutative monoid with an identity element [math]; 2. (2)
is a commutative monoid with an identity element ; 3. (3)
Multiplication distributes over addition, i.e., for all ; 4. (4)
The element [math] is the absorbing element of the multiplication, i.e., for all .
Since the language for semirings is not completely standardized [2], we need to introduce some other concepts. A nonempty subset of a semiring is said to be an ideal of , if for all and for all and [1]. An ideal of a semiring is called a proper ideal of the semiring , if . A proper ideal of a semiring is called a prime ideal of , if implies either or . Finally, let us recall that an ideal of a semiring is subtractive if and imply that for all [4].
A semiring is a semidomain if with will cause , for all . Similar to the concept of field of fractions in ring theory, one can define the semifield of fractions of the semidomain [3, p. 22]. An ideal of a semiring is called principal if for some . The ideal is denoted by . Finally, if is a semiring, for , it is written and said that “ divides ”, if for some . This is equivalent to say that . Also, it is said that and are associates if for some unit and note that if is a semidomain, then this is equivalent to say that . A nonzero, nonunit element of a semiring is said to be irreducible if for some , then either or is a unit. This is equivalent to say that is maximal among proper principal ideals of . An element is said to be a prime element, if the principal ideal is a prime ideal of , which is equivalent to say if , then either or [9].
A semidomain is called factorial (also unique factorization) if the following conditions are satisfied:
- (1)
Each irreducible element of is a prime element of . 2. (2)
Any nonzero and nonunit element of is a product of irreducible elements of .
In Section 1, we introduce the concept of the order of an element in a factorial (unique factorization) semidomain and the traditional version of the concept of the content of a polynomial over such semirings, all inspired by the Lang’s approach to these concepts in his textbook (refer to Chapter IV in [6]).
In Definition 1.1, we define that if is a factorial semidomain, is its semifield of fractions, is a nonzero element of , and is a prime element of , then the order of at is the integer , denoted by , such that and does not divide the numerator or denominator of . If , we define its order at to be . With the help of this concept, we define the concept of the “order at ” for polynomials in one variable. For the polynomial
[TABLE]
if , we define and , we define to be
[TABLE]
where . Then, we define the content of , denoted by , to be the following product
[TABLE]
being taken over all such that , or any multiple of this product by a unit of .
It is straightforward to see that for each , there is a polynomial such that , , and (see Definition 1.5 and Proposition 1.6).
In Section 2, we prove a semiring version of Gauss’ lemma for polynomial semirings (see Theorem 2.2) in this sense that the function is multiplicative, i.e. for all , we have
[TABLE]
Our general references for semiring theory are the books [3, 4, 5].
1. The Concepts of Order and Content
Let be a factorial semidomain and its semifield of fractions. Let and . If is a prime element of , then can be written as such that is an integer number and does not divide the numerator or denominator of . Since is factorial, is uniquely determined by . Based on this simple argument, we give the following definition:
Definition 1.1**.**
Let be a factorial semidomain and its semifield of fractions. Let be a nonzero element of . If is a prime element of , then we define the order of at the integer , denoted by , such that and does not divide the numerator or denominator of . If , we define its order at to be .
Definition 1.2**.**
Let and be two semirings. We say that a function has logarithmic property if for all nonzero .
The proof of the following statement is straightforward:
Proposition 1.3**.**
Let be a factorial semidomain, its semifield of fractions, and a prime element of . Then the following statements hold:
- (1)
The function has logarithmic property, i.e.
[TABLE]
where and . 2. (2)
For all nonzero , we have if and only if .
Remark 1.4*.*
Let be a factorial semidomain, its semifield of fractions, and a prime element of . In fact, is a discrete valuation map on (see Definition 1.1 and Example 3.2 in [10]).
Now, we define the concept of the “order at ” for polynomials in one variable:
Definition 1.5**.**
Let be a factorial semidomain, its semifield of fractions, and a prime element of . Let
[TABLE]
be a polynomial in one variable.
- (1)
If , we define . If , we define to be
[TABLE]
where . 2. (2)
If , we call a -content for , for any unit of . 3. (3)
We define the content of , denoted by , to be the following product
[TABLE]
being taken over all such that , or any multiple of this product by a unit of .
Let be a semiring. A greatest common divisor (abbreviated as gcd) of a set , which has at least one nonzero element, is a nonzero element , if for any and if for any , then . It is clear that this is equivalent to say that is the minimal element of all principal ideals containing the ideal generated by the set . A greatest common divisor of the set , which is not necessarily unique, is denoted by [9]. The proof of the following statement is straightforward:
Proposition 1.6**.**
Let be a factorial semidomain, its semifield of fractions, and . Then the following statements hold:
- (1)
The content of is well defined up to multiplication by a unit of . 2. (2)
The function is homogeneous, i.e. for each nonzero , we have **[8]**. 3. (3)
There is a polynomial such that , , and . In particular, all coefficients of lie in and their gcd is 1.
2. Gauss’ Lemma for Polynomials over Subtractive Factorial Semidomains
Lemma 2.1**.**
Let be a subtractive semiring and , , and be arbitrary elements of . If and , then .
Proof.
Let and . So, and . Therefore, . Since is subtractive and and are elements of the ideal , we have . This implies that , which is equivalent to say that and this finishes the proof. ∎
Now, we have enough tools to give a semiring version of Gauss’ Lemma:
Theorem 2.2** (Gauss’ Lemma).**
Let be a subtractive factorial semidomain, and let be its semifield of fractions. Let be polynomials in one variable. Then the function is multiplicative, i.e. for all , we have
[TABLE]
Proof.
By Proposition 1.6, we can write and such that , , , and . Therefore, it is sufficient to prove that if and , then , and for this, it suffices to prove that for each prime , . Now, let
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
be polynomials of content 1. Let be a prime of . In order to show that , it will suffice to prove that does not divide all coefficients of . Let be the largest integer such that , , and does not divide . Similarly, let be the coefficient of farthest to the left, , such that does not divide . Consider the coefficient of in . This coefficient is equal to
[TABLE]
and . However, divides every other non-zero term in this sum since in each term there will be some coefficient to the left of or some coefficient to the left of . Now, since every ideal of is subtractive, by Lemma 2.1, can not divide , and this completes the proof of the lemma.∎
Definition 2.3**.**
Let be a factorial semidomain and its semifield of fractions. We define a polynomial of content 1 to be a primitive polynomial.
Corollary 2.4**.**
Let be a factorial semidomain. If are primitive, then is also primitive.
Remark 2.5*.*
The modern definition for the concept of the content of an element of a semialgebra has been given and discussed in [7]. If is a factorial semidomain and is a polynomial, then the content of in the modern form, denoted by , is defined to be the ideal generated by the coefficients of and in such a case, it is easy to see that is the principal ideal generated by . An -semialgebra is called Gaussian if , for all . It is now clear that by Gauss’ Lemma (Theorem 2.2) if is a factorial semidomain, then is a Gaussian -semialgebra.
Acknowledgments
The author is supported by the Department of Engineering Science at the Golpayegan University of Technology and his special thanks go to the Department for providing all necessary facilities available to him for successfully conducting this research.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Bourne, S.: The Jacobson radical of a semiring , Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 37 (1951), 163–170.
- 2[2] Głazek, K.: A Guide to the Literature on Semirings and Their Applications in Mathematics and Information Sciences , Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2002.
- 3[3] Golan, J.S.: Power Algebras over Semirings, With Applications in Mathematics and Computer Science , Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1999.
- 4[4] Golan, J.S.: Semirings and their Applications , Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1999.
- 5[5] Golan, J.S.: Semirings and Affine Equations over Them: Theory and Applications , Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2003.
- 6[6] Lang, S.: Algebra , 3rd revised ed., Graduate Texts in Mathematics. 211. New York, NY: Springer. xv, 914 p., 2002.
- 7[7] Nasehpour, P.: On the content of polynomials over semirings and its applications , J. Algebra Appl., 15 , No. 5 (2016), Article ID 1650088 (32 pages).
- 8[8] Nasehpour, P.: On zero-divisors of semimodules and semialgebras , ar Xiv:1702.00810 [math.AC], to appear in Georgian Math. J.
