Quantitative properties of the non-properness set of a polynomial map, a positive characteristic case
Zbigniew Jelonek, Micha{\l} Laso\'n

TL;DR
This paper extends previous results on the structure of the non-properness set of polynomial maps from real and complex fields to positive characteristic fields, providing a geometric proof of an upper bound on its degree.
Contribution
It generalizes the known properties of the non-properness set to positive characteristic fields and offers a geometric proof for the degree bound.
Findings
The non-properness set is covered by polynomial curves of degree at most d.
The degree bound for the non-properness set is generalized to positive characteristic.
A geometric proof of the degree bound is provided.
Abstract
Let be a generically finite polynomial map of degree between affine spaces. In arXiv:1411.5011 we proved that if is the field of complex or real numbers, then the set of points at which is not proper, is covered by polynomial curves of degree at most . In this paper we generalize this result to positive characteristic. We provide a geometric proof of an upper bound by .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Quantitative properties of the non-properness set of a polynomial map, a positive characteristic case
Zbigniew Jelonek
and
Michał Lasoń
Institute of Mathematics of the Polish Academy of Sciences, ul.Śniadeckich 8, 00-656 Warszawa, Poland
Institute of Mathematics of the Polish Academy of Sciences, ul.Śniadeckich 8, 00-656 Warszawa, Poland
Abstract.
Let be a generically finite polynomial map of degree between affine spaces. In [10] we proved that if is the field of complex or real numbers, then the set of points at which is not proper, is covered by polynomial curves of degree at most . In this paper we generalize this result to positive characteristic. We provide a geometric proof of an upper bound by .
Key words and phrases:
affine variety, the set of non-proper points, parametric curve, -uniruled set, degree of -uniruledness, positive characteristic
1991 Mathematics Subject Classification:
14R25, 14R99
Research supported by Polish National Science Centre grant no. 2013/09/B/ST1/04162.
1. Introduction
We begin by recalling some necessary definitions, notions and facts (cf. [10]). Unless stated otherwise, is an arbitrary algebraically closed field. All affine varieties are considered to be embedded in an affine space.
An irreducible affine curve is called a parametric curve of degree at most , if there exists a non-constant polynomial map of degree at most (by degree of we mean ). A curve is called parametric if it is parametric of some degree.
Proposition 1.1** (Proposition 1.2 [10], cf. Proposition 2.4 [9]).**
Let be an irreducible affine variety of dimension , and let be a constant. The following conditions are equivalent:
- (1)
for every point there exists a parametric curve of degree at most passing through , 2. (2)
there exists an open, non-empty subset , such that for every point there exists a parametric curve of degree at most passing through , 3. (3)
there exists an affine variety of dimension , and a dominant polynomial map such that .
We say that an affine variety has degree of -uniruledness at most if all its irreducible components satisfy the conditions of Proposition 1.1 (cf. Definition 1.3 [10]). An affine variety is called -uniruled if it has some degree of -uniruledness. To simplify the notion we assume that the empty set has degree of -uniruledness equal to zero, in particular it is -uniruled.
Let be a generically finite polynomial map between affine varieties. Recall that is finite (proper) at a point , if there exists an open neighborhood of such that is a finite map. The set of points at which is not finite (proper) we denote by (see [1], and also [2, 4, 12]). The set is a good measure of non-properness of the map , moreover it has interesting applications [5, 6, 11, 13].
Theorem 1.2** (Theorem 4.1 [8]).**
Let be a generically finite polynomial map between affine varieties. The set is a hypersurface in or it is empty. Additionally, if is -uniruled, then the set is also -uniruled.
Theorem 1.3** (Theorem 4.6 [7]).**
Let be a dominant, generically finite, separable, polynomial map between affine varieties. Then the set is a hypersurface of degree at most
[TABLE]
where is the multiplicity of , or it is empty.
Due to Theorem 1.2, if is a -uniruled affine variety and is a generically finite polynomial map, then the set is -uniruled. In [10] we studied the behavior of degree of -uniruledness of the set as a function of degree of the map .
Theorem 1.4** (Theorem 3.2 [10]).**
Let be a generically finite polynomial map of degree . Then the set has degree of -uniruledness at most .
Theorem 1.5** (Theorem 3.5 [10]).**
Suppose is an affine variety with degree of -uniruledness at most . Let be a generically finite polynomial map of degree . Then the set has degree of -uniruledness at most .
In [10] we provide examples showing that the above bounds are tight. Their proofs intensively use the topology of , thus they can not be adapted for an arbitrary algebraically closed field. However, by the Lefschetz principle, both statements are true for an arbitrary algebraically closed field of characteristic zero.
In this paper we deal with the positive characteristic case. In Theorem 2.3 we almost (up to additive constant ) generalize Theorem 1.4. That is, we prove that the set has degree of -uniruledness at most . Our proof uses cute and simple geometric idea.
2. Main result
Proposition 2.1** ([3]).**
Let be a generically finite map between affine varieties and . Let
[TABLE]
and let be its closure in . Then there is an equality
[TABLE]
where denotes the projection to the second factor .
Lemma 2.2**.**
Let be an affine set, and let be a regular function on not equal to [math] on any component of . Suppose that for each the set
[TABLE]
has degree of -uniruledness at most . Then the set also has degree of -uniruledness at most .
Proof.
Suppose affine set is given by . For and , let
[TABLE]
be a parametric curve of degree at most . Let us consider a variety and a projection
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
The definition of the set says that parametric curves are contained in and is constant on them. Hence is closed and the image of the projection is contained in . Moreover the image contains every for , since they are filled with parametric curves of degree at most . But since is complete and is closed, the image of the projection is closed. Hence it must be the whole set . In particular is contained in the image, so it is filled with parametric curves of degree at most . ∎
Theorem 2.3**.**
Let be an arbitrary algebraically closed field. If is a generically finite polynomial map of degree , then the set has degree of -uniruledness at most .
Proof.
If , then the map is proper and is empty. Suppose . Due to Proposition 2.1
[TABLE]
It is enough to prove that the set is filled with parametric curves of degree at most . Indeed, we can take images of these curves under projection . Projection has degree , so images of these curves are either parametric curves of degree at most , or points. Since map , and as a consequence also , is generically finite, only on a codimension subvariety images of curves will become points. This by Proposition 1.1 is acceptable.
Let us denote coordinates in by . Take an arbitrary point
[TABLE]
We are going to show that through passes a parametric curve of degree at most . Since , there exists such that . Consider an affine set and a function regular on it. Consider sets
[TABLE]
For sets are filled with parametric curves of degree at most . Indeed, we can take an index distinct from and consider curves
[TABLE]
Hence, by Lemma 2.2, the set
[TABLE]
is also filled with such curves. In particular we get that though passes a parametric curve of degree at most which is contained in
[TABLE]
This finishes the proof. ∎
By looking carefully at the above proof we get the following slightly more general result.
Corollary 2.4**.**
Let be an arbitrary algebraically closed field, and let be an affine variety. If is a generically finite polynomial map of degree , then the set has degree of -uniruledness at most .
If we were able to prove the assertion of the corollary for maps , this would imply Theorem 1.5 for arbitrary algebraically closed fields (see the proof of Theorem 3.5 [10]).
3. Remarks
The gap between characteristic zero (Theorem 1.4) and arbitrary characteristic (Theorem 2.3) suggests the following.
Conjecture 3.1**.**
Let be an arbitrary algebraically closed field. If is a generically finite polynomial map of degree , then the set has degree of -uniruledness at most .
When we consider all generically finite maps of degree at most , then by Theorem 1.2 hypersurfaces are all -uniruled, and by Theorem 1.3 degrees of this hypersurfaces are bounded. In Theorem 2.3 we show that their degree of -uniruledness is also bounded (by ). It is reasonable to ask the following general question.
Question 3.2**.**
Does for every and exist a universal constant , such that evey -uniruled hypersurface in of degree at most has degree of -uniruledness at most ?
We ask even a stronger question.
Question 3.3**.**
Does for every and exist a universal constant , such that if a hypersurface in of degree at most contains a parametric curve passing through , then it also contains such a curve of degree at most ?
One can show that positive answer to Question 3.3 is equivalent (for uncountable field ) to the fact that in the set of all hypersurfaces in of a bounded degree, the set of -uniruled hypersurfaces forms a closed subset.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Z. Jelonek, The set of points at which the polynomial mapping is not proper, Ann. Polon. Math. 58 (1993), 259-266.
- 2[2] Z. Jelonek, Testing sets for properness of polynomial mappings, Math. Ann. 315 (1999), 1-35.
- 3[3] Z. Jelonek, Local characterization of algebraic manifolds and characterization of components of the set S f subscript 𝑆 𝑓 S_{f} , Ann. Polon. Math. (2000), 7-13.
- 4[4] Z. Jelonek, Topological characterization of finite mappings, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. Math. 49 (2001), 279-283.
- 5[5] Z. Jelonek, K. Kurdyka, On asymptotic critical values of a complex polynomial, J. Reine Angew. Math. 565 (2003), 1-11.
- 6[6] Z. Jelonek, On the effective Nullstellensatz, Invent. Math. 162 (2005), 1-17.
- 7[7] Z. Jelonek, On the Łojasiewicz exponent, Hokkaido Math. J. 35 (2006), 471-485.
- 8[8] Z. Jelonek, On the Russell problem, J. Algebra 324 (2010), no. 12, 3666-3676.
