# A Distribution Dependent and Independent Complexity Analysis of Manifold   Regularization

**Authors:** Alexander Mey, Tom Viering, Marco Loog

arXiv: 1906.06100 · 2020-07-31

## TL;DR

This paper provides a theoretical analysis of manifold regularization in semi-supervised learning, deriving sample complexity bounds and discussing their implications for model performance and parameter selection.

## Contribution

It introduces distribution-dependent and independent complexity bounds for manifold regularization, enhancing understanding of its sample efficiency and guiding parameter tuning.

## Key findings

- Semi-supervised methods can only achieve constant improvement over supervised methods under certain conditions.
- Distribution-dependent Rademacher bounds are derived for manifold regularization.
- Bounds can inform regularization parameter choice in sparse label scenarios.

## Abstract

Manifold regularization is a commonly used technique in semi-supervised learning. It enforces the classification rule to be smooth with respect to the data-manifold. Here, we derive sample complexity bounds based on pseudo-dimension for models that add a convex data dependent regularization term to a supervised learning process, as is in particular done in Manifold regularization. We then compare the bound for those semi-supervised methods to purely supervised methods, and discuss a setting in which the semi-supervised method can only have a constant improvement, ignoring logarithmic terms. By viewing Manifold regularization as a kernel method we then derive Rademacher bounds which allow for a distribution dependent analysis. Finally we illustrate that these bounds may be useful for choosing an appropriate manifold regularization parameter in situations with very sparsely labeled data.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.06100/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.06100/full.md

## References

22 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.06100/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.06100