# Evolutionary models for ultracool dwarfs

**Authors:** Catarina S. Fernandes, Valerie Van Grootel, Sebastien J. A. J. Salmon,, Bernhard Aringer, Adam J. Burgasser, Richard Scuflaire, Pierre Brassard and, Gilles Fontaine

arXiv: 1906.05626 · 2019-07-17

## TL;DR

This paper extends an evolutionary code to model ultracool dwarfs, incorporating detailed physics and atmospheric models, and validates the models against observed data, providing a new tool for characterizing these objects.

## Contribution

The authors developed and validated ultracool dwarf evolutionary models with detailed physics, including C and O effects, and provided reference tables for parameter estimation.

## Key findings

- Including C and O significantly affects models near the H-burning limit.
- Models reproduce observed masses within 1-2.5 sigma.
- Systematic errors in models are around 0.0005 solar masses.

## Abstract

Ultracool dwarfs have emerged as key targets for searches of transiting exoplanets. Precise estimates of the host parameters (including mass, age, and radius) are fundamental to constrain the physical properties of orbiting exoplanets. We have extended our evolutionary code CLES (Code Li\'egeois d'Evolution Stellaire) to the ultracool dwarf regime. We include relevant equations of state for H, He, as well as C and O elements to cover the temperature-density regime of ultracool dwarf interiors. For various metallicities, we couple the interior models to two sets of model atmospheres as surface boundary conditions. We show that including C and O in the EOS has a significant effect close the H-burning limit mass. The typical systematic error associated with uncertainties in input physics in evolutionary models is $\sim 0.0005 M_\odot$. We test model results against observations for objects whose parameters have been determined from independent techniques. We are able to reproduce dynamical mass measurements of LSPM J1314+1320AB within $1\sigma$ with the condition of varying the metallicity (determined from calibrations) up to $2.5\sigma$. For GJ 65AB, a $2\sigma$ agreement is obtained between individual masses from differential astrometry and those from evolutionary models. We provide tables of ultracool dwarf models for various masses and metallicities that can be used as reference when estimating parameters for ultracool objects.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.05626/full.md

## Figures

18 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.05626/full.md

## References

81 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.05626/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.05626