Amenability and harmonic $L^p$-functions on hypergroups
Mehdi Nemati, Jila Sohaei

TL;DR
This paper explores the relationship between amenability and harmonic functions on hypergroups, establishing conditions under which harmonic functions are trivial or constant, and linking these properties to the hypergroup's structure.
Contribution
It proves the equivalence of Liouville property and amenability for second countable hypergroups and characterizes harmonic $L^p$-functions under various conditions.
Findings
Liouville property and amenability are equivalent for second countable hypergroups.
Harmonic $L^p$-functions are trivial for all $1 \\leq p < \\infty$.
Harmonic functions are constant if the hypergroup is compact and $\sigma$ is adapted.
Abstract
Let be a locally compact hypergroup with a left invariant Haar measure. We show that the Liouville property and amenability are equivalent for when it is second countable. Suppose that is a non-degenerate probability measure on , we show that there is no non-trivial -harmonic function which is continuous and vanishing at infinity. Using this, we prove that the space of all -harmonic -functions, is trivial for all . Further, it is shown that contains only constant functions if and only if it is a subalgebra of . In the case where is adapted and is compact, we show that for all .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Operator Algebra Research · Advanced Topology and Set Theory · Advanced Banach Space Theory
Amenability and harmonic -functions on hypergroups
Mehdi Nemati1 and Jila Sohaei2
1Department of Mathematical Sciences, Isfahan Uinversity of Technology, Isfahan 84156-83111, Iran;
School of Mathematics, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), P.O. Box: 19395–5746, Tehran, Iran.
2 Department of Mathematical Sciences, Isfahan Uinversity of Technology, Isfahan 84156-83111, Iran
Abstract.
Let be a locally compact hypergroup with a left invariant Haar measure. We show that the Liouville property and amenability are equivalent for when it is second countable. Suppose that is a non-degenerate probability measure on , we show that there is no non-trivial -harmonic function which is continuous and vanishing at infinity. Using this, we prove that the space of all -harmonic -functions, is trivial for all . Further, it is shown that contains only constant functions if and only if it is a subalgebra of . In the case where is adapted and is compact, we show that for all .
Key words and phrases:
Amenability, hypergroup, harmonic function, Liouville property.
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
43A62, 43A15, 43A07, 45E10.
1. Introduction
Let be a complex Borel measure on a locally compact group . A Borel function on is called -harmonic if it satisfies the convolution equation . It is a well-known result of [4] that if is abelian, then the only bounded continuous -harmonic function are constant functions when the support of generates a dense subgroup of . Bounded harmonic functions have been investigated by several authors for various kinds of groups, e.g., nilpotent groups and compact groups [7, 8, 10, 11, 12]. Moreover, it was shown in [5] that for , any -harmonic -function associated to an adapted probability measure on a locally compact group is trivial. Harmonic functions on groups play important roles in analysis, geometry and probability theory [6].
Motivated by these observations, bounded continuous harmonic functions on nilpotent, [IN] and central hypergroups have been studied in [1, 2].
In what follows, denotes a locally compact hypergroup with a left-invariant Haar measure. The purpose of this paper is to obtain some insight into the harmonic functions problem for the -spaces, , of .
In Section 3, for given a complex Borel measure on with , we first show that there is a contractive projection from , , onto . We also show that is necessarily amenable if it has the Liouville property; that is, there exists a probability measure on such that all -harmonic -functions on are constant. Further, we prove that a second countable hypergroup possesses the Liouville property if and only if it is amenable.
In Section 4, for the case that is a non-degenerate probability measure on , we show that the space of all -harmonic functions which are continuous and vanishing at infinity are trivial. Using this we prove that for , any -harmonic -function is trivial. For such a measure , we also prove that is a subalgebra of if and only if . In the case where is adapted and is compact, we show that for all . These extend the results for the group case in [5].
2. Preliminaries
Let be a locally compact Hausdorff space. The space is a hypergroup if there exists a bilinear, associative, weakly continuous convolution on the Banach space of all bounded regular complex valued Borel measures on , such that is an algebra and satisfies, for ,
(i) is a probability measure on with compact support,
(ii) the mapping , is continuous with respect to the Michael topology on the space of nonvoid compact sets in ,
(ii) the mapping , is continuous,
(ii) there is an identity with ,
(iv)there is a continuous involution on such that and if and only if . The image measure of under such involution is denoted by .
Given a (complex) Borel function on and the left translation and the right translation are defined by
[TABLE]
if the integral exists, where . For a Borel function on the Borel function is defined by for all . Given , their convolution is given by
[TABLE]
and which shows that Also for a measure and a Borel function on , we define the convolutions and by
[TABLE]
if the integrals exist. Note that in this case . Moreover, if is in , the Banach space of bounded complex continuous functions on , then and are in with and . We refer the reader to [3] for details of hypergroups.
3. Amenability and Liouville property
Throughout of this paper, let be a locally compact hypergroup with a left-invariant Haar measure ; that is, a non-zero positive Radon measure on such that
[TABLE]
Let be the Banach space of complex continuous functions on vanishing at infinity. Then its dual identifies, via the Riesz representation theorem, with the space . Let be the complex Lebesgue spaces with respect to , for . Given a Borel measure on a hypergroup , a Borel function on satisfying the convolution equation
[TABLE]
is called -harmonic. For define to be the set of all -harmonic -functions; that is, . For Borel functions and at least one of which is -finite, define the convolution on by
[TABLE]
We commence with the following lemma whose proof is similar to those given in [5]. For completeness, we present the argument here.
Lemma 3.1**.**
Let with and let . Then there is a contractive projection with . Moreover, if with , then is the dual map of the projection .
Proof.
Let be a free ultra-filter on , and define by the weak∗ limit
[TABLE]
where is the -times convolution of with itself. It is easy to see that for all . Moreover, if , then it is easily verified that and so . These show that and .
Suppose now that . Then it is not hard to check that for all . Therefore, for each , we have
[TABLE]
This shows that for all . Similarly, we can show that for all . Consequently, for each and , we have
[TABLE]
This shows that for all , as required. ∎
Remark 3.2*.*
Let with and let be such that . Then we have linear isometric isomorphisms , where the first isometry is given by . Indeed, for each , we have
[TABLE]
Recall that the hypergroup is called amenable if there exists a topological left invariant mean on ; that is, there exists such that and for all and . A topological right invariant mean on is a functional such that and for all and . It is known that the involution on can be canonically extended to a linear involution on ; see [9, Chapter 2]. Clearly, is a topological left invariant mean if and only if is a topological right invariant mean. Therefore, the existence of a topological right invariant mean on is equivalent to being amenable.
Theorem 3.3**.**
Let be a hypergroup with the Liouville property; that is, there exists a probability measure on such that . Then is amenable.
Proof.
Let be the contractive projection as defined in Lemma 3.1. Then there is a unique functional such that for all . Since for all and , it follows that . Moreover, since the projection is positive and , we conclude that . This shows that is a topological right invariant mean on , which implies that is amenable.
∎
For a a locally compact hypergroup consider the closed two sided ideal
[TABLE]
in and for each let be the norm closure of in . It is well known that has codimension one in and if is a probability measure, then . Moreover, it is easy to see that and hence
We have the following lemma whose proof is similar to those given in [14, Lemma 1.1 and Remark 3, p.210] for locally compact groups. Thus, we omit the proof.
Lemma 3.4**.**
Let be a locally compact hypergroup and be a norm closed, convex subsemigroup of probability measuers on . Let be a separable, closed subspace of such that
(i)* for every ; and*
(ii)* for each and there is such that*
[TABLE]
Then there is such that .
Corollary 3.5**.**
Let be a second countable locally compact hypergroup. Then the following conditions are equivalent.
(i)* is amenable.*
(ii)* There exists a probability measure on such that .*
(iii)* has the Liouville property.*
Proof.
(i)(ii). Suppose that is amenable. Then by [13, Corollary 4.2], there is a net in such that
[TABLE]
for all . In particular, for each we have . Moreover, for all , where . This shows that the condition (ii) of Lemma 3.4 is satisfied. Since is separable, we give that for some probability measure on .
(iii)(i). This follows from Theorem 3.3.
(ii)(iii). This follows from the inclusion with the fact that . ∎
Proposition 3.6**.**
Let be a probability measure on and let . Then is generated by its non-negative elements.
Proof.
Suppose that . Then . This shows that is self-adjoint and consequently is generated by its real function parts. Now let be a real function and let , where are non-negative functions in . Since is positive, the projection , as defined in Theorem 3.1, is positive. It follows that are non-negative. Moreover, , and this completes the proof. ∎
4. Harmonic -functions
Let be a complex Borel measure on a locally compact hypergroup . We say that is non-degenerate if
[TABLE]
where is the -fold convolution of and equals the closure of . If satisfies the weaker condition that
[TABLE]
then we say that is adapted.
Remark 4.1*.*
Let . Then it is not hard to check that non-degeneracy of is equivalent to that for every non-zero , or equivalently there exists such that
[TABLE]
Therefore, if is non-zero, then we may find such that and . It follows that and . Therefore, there exists such that
[TABLE]
Theorem 4.2**.**
Let be a probability measure on . Then the following statements are equivalent.
(i)* is a subalgebra of .*
(ii)* is a von Neumann subalgebra of ..*
(iii)* H^{\infty}_{\sigma}(K)=\{f\in L^{\infty}(K):\forall x\in K,f(\check{y}*x)=f(x),~{}\hbox{for \sigma-a.e.}~{}y\in K\}.*
Proof.
Since is a weak∗ closed operator system, (i) implies that is a von Neumann subalgebra of . The implication (iii)(i) is trivial. We need to prove (ii)(iii). Let and . Without loss of generality assume that is real valued. Since , it follows that
[TABLE]
This implies that for almost every . ∎
For a hypergroup , we denote by to be the Banach space of all bounded left uniformly continuous complex functions on , consisting of bounded continuous function on such that the map is continuous.
Lemma 4.3**.**
Let . Then is weak∗ dense in .
Let be a bounded approximate identity for and . Then for all , by [13, Lemma 2.2]. Moreover, for each , we have
[TABLE]
Thus, is weak∗ dense in .
Corollary 4.4**.**
Let be a non-degenerate probability measure on . Then the following conditions are equivalent.
(i)* is a subalgebra of .*
(ii)* .*
Proof.
Suppose that (i) holds. Given , by Theorem 4.2 for each , we have for all . It follows from non-degeneracy of and continuity of that is constant. Since is weak∗ dense in , we give that . ∎
A subspace of , , is called left (resp. right) translation invariant if (resp. ) for all and . The subspace is called translation invariant if it is left and right translation invariant. It is easy to check that for each the space is a right translation invariant subspace of . Since for all , and , it follows that is also right translation invariant in , where is the modular function on . We recall that is naturally a Banach -bimodule by the following module actions
[TABLE]
It is easily verified that
[TABLE]
for all .
Proposition 4.5**.**
Let . Then the following conditions are equivalent.
(i)* is translation invariant.*
(ii)* is translation invariant.*
(iii)* is an ideal in .*
(iv)* for all .*
(v)* is a sub--bimodule of .*
Proof.
(i)(ii). Since for all , and , it follows that is left translation invariant if and only if is.
(ii)(iii). It suffices to show that is a left ideal in . To prove this, given , and , we have
[TABLE]
which implies that .
(iii)(ii). Let be a bounded approximate identity for and let . Since and for all and , the proof follows from the fact that .
(i)(iv). Suppose that . Since is left translation invariant, we obtain that
[TABLE]
(iv)(i). Suppose that and . Then , by right translation invariance of . Moreover, for each , we have
[TABLE]
This shows that and hence is left translation invariant by weak∗ density of in .
(i)(v). Let and . As , we give that . Moreover, by assumption for all . Thus,
[TABLE]
This implies that .
(v)(iii). It suffices to show that is a left ideal in . Indeed, given , and , we have
[TABLE]
which yields that , as required. ∎
Remark 4.6*.*
It is obvious that under each of above equivalent conditions in Proposition 4.5, the quotient space is a Banach algebra. This implies that is a Banach algebra with respect to the two Arens products.
Theorem 4.7**.**
Let be a non-degenerate probability measure on . Then every bounded continuous -harmonic function on vanishing at infinity is constant.
Proof.
Let be real-valued. Without loss of generality assume that . Therefor, we can find a probability measure on such that . If , then the function is also non-negative and non-zero -harmonic function in . It is well known from [3, Proposition 1.2.16] that is a non-negative and bounded continuous function. Moreover,
[TABLE]
which implies that is non-zero. Since is non-degenerate, by Remark 4.1, there exists such that
[TABLE]
On the other hand, since is -harmonic, . Therefore,
[TABLE]
which is a contradiction. Since is generated by its non-negative elements, the proof is complete. ∎
Corollary 4.8**.**
Let be non-compact and let be a non-degenerate probability measure on . Then the sequence is weak∗-convergent to [math].
Proof.
Let be a weak∗ cluster point of in . Then , which implies that is an idempotent probability measure in . Moreover, for each we have
[TABLE]
This shows that is -harmonic and so it is constant by Theorem 4.7. Since is non-compact, we must have for all . This implies that . Thus, [math] is the only weak∗ cluster point of in . By weak∗ compactness of the unit ball of we conclude that . ∎
Corollary 4.9**.**
The hypergroup is compact if and only if there is a non-degenerate idempotent probability measure on .
Theorem 4.10**.**
Let be non-compact and let be a non-degenerate probability measure on . Then we have for all .
Proof.
Let and let be a non-negative function in with . Consider the probability measure on defined by
[TABLE]
It is easy to see that . Moreover, we may find with such that , where and . It follows from [3, (1.4.11), (1.4.12)] that and . Therefore, and
[TABLE]
It follows from non-degeneracy of that , contradicting being non-compact. Hence, . Thus, Proposition 3.6 implies that . ∎
We use the following result which is proved in [2, Theorem 3.8] to show that if is an adapted probability measure on compact hypergroup , then each -harmonic -function is trivial for all .
Theorem 4.11**.**
If is an adapted probability measure on a compact hypergroup , then each -harmonic continuous function on is constant.
Theorem 4.12**.**
Let be a compact hypergroup and let be an adapted probability measure on . Then for , we have .
Proof.
Let be compact. Then we have for all . Thus, it suffices to prove the assertion for the case . Let and let be a bounded approximate identity for such that is a bounded continuous function with compact support for all ; see [3, Theorem 1.6.15]. Then [13, Lemma 2.2(i)] implies that is continuous and bounded for all . Moreover, it is clear that is -harmonic, and is therefore constant by Theorem 4.11. This shows that is also constant, as desired. ∎
Corollary 4.13**.**
Let be a compact hypergroup and let be a non-degenerate probability measure on . Then any weak∗ cluster point of the sequence in is the normalized Haar measure on .
Proof.
Let be a weak∗ cluster point of in . Then we have is an idempotent probability measure on satisfying , and therefore for all . It follows from Theorem 4.11 and the non-degeneracy of that for each there exists such that . Let be the normalized Haar measure on . Then for each ,
[TABLE]
Moreover,
[TABLE]
This shows that . Since , we conclude that . ∎
Let . We say that a measure is -harmonic if it satisfies the convolution equation . Define to be the set of all -harmonic measures.
Theorem 4.14**.**
Let with . Then there is a contractive projection with .
Proof.
Let be a free ultra-filter on , and define by the weak∗ limit
[TABLE]
It is easy to see that for all . Moreover, if , then it is easily verified that and hence . These show that and . ∎
Recall that a measure is non-negative if for all .
Proposition 4.15**.**
Let be a probability measure on . Then is generated by its non-negative elements.
Proof.
Suppose that . Then . This shows that is generated by its real measure parts. Now let be a real measure and let , where are non-negative measures in . Since is positive, the measures are non-negative. Moreover, , which completes the proof. ∎
Theorem 4.16**.**
Let be non-compact and let be a non-degenerate probability measure on . Then we have .
Proof.
Suppose that is non-zero. By Proposition 4.15, we can assume that is positive. Consider the probability measure defined by . It is clear that . By [3, Theorem 1.6.9], we have that for all . This shows that is the left Haar measure that is finite on , which is a contradiction with non-compactness of .
∎
Corollary 4.17**.**
Let be non-compact and let be a non-degenerate probability measure on . Then we have .
Proof.
Suppose that . Define , where is the left Haar measure on . Then we have
[TABLE]
Therefore, by Theorem 4.16 and hence . ∎
Theorem 4.18**.**
let be compact and let be an adabted probability measure on . Then we have , where is the normalized Haar measure on .
Proof.
Because is compact, the Haar measure is in and we have . Therefore, . To prove the converse, suppose that . Then . Let be a bounded approximate identity for such that for every and ; see [3, Theorem 1.6.15]. Then and for all . Thus, Theorem 4.12 implies that is constant for all . Hence, for every there is such that . It follows that for each , we have
[TABLE]
Therefore, for all . This shows that there exists such that . It follows that . ∎
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] M. Amini, Harmonic functions on [IN] and central hypergroups, Monatsh. Math. 169 (2013), 267–284.
- 2[2] M. Amini and C.-H. Chu, Harmonic functions on hypergroups, J. Func. Anal. 261 (2011), 1835–1864.
- 3[3] W. R. Bloom and H. Heyer, Harmonic Analysis of Probability Measures on Hypergroups, de Gruyter Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 20. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1995.
- 4[4] G. Choquet and J. Deny, Sur l’équation de convolution μ ∗ σ = μ 𝜇 𝜎 𝜇 \mu*\sigma=\mu , C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I Math. 250 (1960), 779–801.
- 5[5] C.-H. Chu, Harmonic function spaces on groups, J. London Math. Soc. 70 (2004), 182–198.
- 6[6] C.-H. Chu, Matrix convolution operators on groups, Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 1956. Springer, Heidelberg, 2008.
- 7[7] C.-H. Chu and T. Hilberdink, The convolution equation of Choquet and Deny on nilpotent groups, Integral Equ. Oper. Theory, 26 (1996), 1–13.
- 8[8] C.-H. Chu and A. T. Lau, Harmonic functions on groups and Fourier algebras, Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 1782, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2002.
