# Unified Semantic Parsing with Weak Supervision

**Authors:** Priyanka Agrawal, Parag Jain, Ayushi Dalmia, Abhishek Bansal, Ashish, Mittal, Karthik Sankaranarayanan

arXiv: 1906.05062 · 2019-06-13

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a unified semantic parser trained with weak supervision across multiple domains, leveraging multi-policy distillation to improve accuracy and generalization without requiring domain labels.

## Contribution

It proposes a novel multi-policy distillation framework for multi-domain semantic parsing using weak supervision, enhancing performance and reducing annotation needs.

## Key findings

- 20% improvement in denotation accuracy on Overnight dataset
- Effective multi-policy distillation for domain-specific and unified parsing
- No domain labels needed during querying

## Abstract

Semantic parsing over multiple knowledge bases enables a parser to exploit structural similarities of programs across the multiple domains. However, the fundamental challenge lies in obtaining high-quality annotations of (utterance, program) pairs across various domains needed for training such models. To overcome this, we propose a novel framework to build a unified multi-domain enabled semantic parser trained only with weak supervision (denotations). Weakly supervised training is particularly arduous as the program search space grows exponentially in a multi-domain setting. To solve this, we incorporate a multi-policy distillation mechanism in which we first train domain-specific semantic parsers (teachers) using weak supervision in the absence of the ground truth programs, followed by training a single unified parser (student) from the domain specific policies obtained from these teachers. The resultant semantic parser is not only compact but also generalizes better, and generates more accurate programs. It further does not require the user to provide a domain label while querying. On the standard Overnight dataset (containing multiple domains), we demonstrate that the proposed model improves performance by 20% in terms of denotation accuracy in comparison to baseline techniques.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.05062/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.05062/full.md

## References

31 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.05062/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.05062