Divisibility of Andrews' Singular Overpartitions by Powers of 2 and 3
Rupam Barman, Chiranjit Ray

TL;DR
This paper proves that the singular overpartition function introduced by Andrews is almost always divisible by arbitrarily high powers of 2 and 3, extending previous divisibility results.
Contribution
It establishes that for any positive integer k, the function C_{3,1}(n) is almost always divisible by 2^k and 3^k, generalizing earlier divisibility findings.
Findings
C_{3,1}(n) is almost always divisible by 2^k for any k.
C_{3,1}(n) is almost always divisible by 3^k for any k.
Extends previous divisibility results for singular overpartitions.
Abstract
Andrews introduced the partition function , called singular overpartition, which counts the number of overpartitions of in which no part is divisible by and only parts may be overlined. He also proved that and are divisible by for . Recently Aricheta proved that for an infinite family of , is almost always even. In this paper, we prove that for any positive integer , is almost always divisible by and
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Divisibility of Andrews’ Singular Overpartitions by Powers of and
Rupam Barman
Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Assam, India, PIN- 781039
and
Chiranjit Ray
Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Assam, India, PIN- 781039
(Date: To appear at Research in Number Theory, Accepted on 11th June, 2019)
Abstract.
Andrews introduced the partition function , called singular overpartition, which counts the number of overpartitions of in which no part is divisible by and only parts may be overlined. He also proved that and are divisible by for . Recently Aricheta proved that for an infinite family of , is almost always even. In this paper, we prove that for any positive integer , is almost always divisible by and
Key words and phrases:
Singular overpartitions; Eta-quotients; modular forms
1991 Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary 05A17, 11P83
1. Introduction and statement of results
In [7], Corteel and Lovejoy introduced overpartitions. An overpartition of is a non-increasing sequence of natural numbers whose sum is in which the first occurrence of a number may be overlined. In [2], Andrews defined the partition function , called singular overpartition, which counts the number of overpartitions of in which no part is divisible by and only parts may be overlined. For example, with the relevant partitions being . For and , the generating function for is given by
[TABLE]
where . Andrews proved the following Ramanujan-type congruences satisfied by : For ,
[TABLE]
Chen, Hirschhorn and Sellers [6] later showed that Andrews’ congruences modulo are two examples of an infinite family of congruences modulo which hold for the function . Recently, Ahmed and Baruah [1] found congruences modulo , and for , infinite families of congruences modulo and for , congruences modulo and for and ; and congruences modulo for and .
In a recent work, Naika and Gireesh [11] proved congruences for modulo , , , , and . They also found infinite families of congruences for modulo , , , and . In [4], we affirm a conjecture of Naika and Gireesh by proving that for all .
In [6], Chen, Hirschhorn and Sellers studied the parity of . They showed that is always even and that is even (or odd) if and only if is not (or is) a pentagonal number. In a very recent paper, Aricheta [3] studied the parity of . To be specific, represent any positive integer as where the integer and is positive odd. Assume further that . Then Aricheta proved that is almost always even, that is
[TABLE]
Let be a fixed positive integer. Gordon and Ono [8] proved that the number of partitions of into distinct parts is divisible by for almost all . Similar studies are done for some other partition functions, for example see [5, 10, 14]. In this article, we study divisibility of by and . To be specific, we prove that is divisible by and for almost all .
Theorem 1.1**.**
Let be a fixed positive integer. Then is almost always divisible by , namely,
[TABLE]
We further prove that the partition function is also divisible by for almost all .
Theorem 1.2**.**
Let be a fixed positive integer. Then is almost always divisible by , namely,
[TABLE]
Chen, Hirschhorn and Sellers [6] showed that is even for all . Hence, we have the following corollary.
Corollary 1.3**.**
Let be a fixed positive integer. Then is almost always divisible by .
2. Preliminaries
In this section, we recall some definitions and basic facts on modular forms. For more details, see for example [13, 9]. We first define the matrix groups
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
where is a positive integer. A subgroup of is called a congruence subgroup if for some . The smallest such that is called the level of . For example, and are congruence subgroups of level .
Let be the upper half of the complex plane. The group
[TABLE]
acts on by . We identify with and define , where . This gives an action of on the extended upper half-plane . Suppose that is a congruence subgroup of . A cusp of is an equivalence class in under the action of .
The group also acts on functions . In particular, suppose that . If is a meromorphic function on and is an integer, then define the slash operator by
[TABLE]
Definition 2.1**.**
Let be a congruence subgroup of level . A holomorphic function is called a modular form with integer weight on if the following hold:
- (1)
We have
[TABLE]
for all and all . 2. (2)
If , then has a Fourier expansion of the form
[TABLE]
where .
For a positive integer , the complex vector space of modular forms of weight with respect to a congruence subgroup is denoted by .
Definition 2.2**.**
[13, Definition 1.15] If is a Dirichlet character modulo , then we say that a modular form has Nebentypus character if
[TABLE]
for all and all . The space of such modular forms is denoted by .
Recall that Dedekind’s eta-function is defined by
[TABLE]
where and . A function is called an eta-quotient if it is of the form
[TABLE]
where is a positive integer and is an integer.
We now recall two theorems from [13, p. 18] which will be used to prove our results.
Theorem 2.3**.**
[13, Theorem 1.64]** If is an eta-quotient such that ,
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
then satisfies
[TABLE]
for every . Here the character is defined by , where .
Suppose that is an eta-quotient satisfying the conditions of Theorem 2.3 and that the associated weight is a positive integer. If is holomorphic at all of the cusps of , then . The following theorem gives the necessary criterion for determining orders of an eta-quotient at cusps.
Theorem 2.4**.**
[13, Theorem 1.65]** Let and be positive integers with and . If is an eta-quotient satisfying the conditions of Theorem 2.3 for , then the order of vanishing of at the cusp is
[TABLE]
3. Proof of Theorems 1.1 and 1.2
The generating function of is given by
[TABLE]
We note that is a power series of . Given a prime , let
[TABLE]
Then using binomial theorem we have
[TABLE]
Define by
[TABLE]
Modulo , we have
[TABLE]
Combining (3.1) and (3.4), we obtain
[TABLE]
We now give a sketch of the idea of the proof of our main results. Firstly, we show that the eta-quotient is a modular form on with some Nebentypus character for . Then we apply a deep theorem of Serre regarding the divisibility of Fourier coefficients of modular forms to and . Finally, we use the congruence to deduce divisibility properties of .
Proof of Theorem 1.1.
We put in (3.3) to obtain
[TABLE]
Now, is an eta-quotient with . The cusps of are represented by fractions where and . For example, see [12, p. 5]. By Theorem 2.4, we find that is holomorphic at a cusp if and only if
[TABLE]
Equivalently, if and only if
[TABLE]
In the following table, we find all the possible values of .
[TABLE]
Since for all , we have that is holomorphic at every cusp . Using Theorem 2.3, we find that the weight of is . Also, the associated character for is given by . Finally, Theorem 2.3 yields that . Let be a positive integer. By a deep theorem of Serre [13, p. 43], if has Fourier expansion
[TABLE]
then there is a constant such that
[TABLE]
Since , the Fourier coefficients of are almost always divisible by . Now, using (3.5) we complete the proof of the theorem. ∎
Proof of Theorem 1.2.
We put in (3.3) to obtain
[TABLE]
As before, the cusps of are represented by fractions where and . By Theorem 2.4, is holomorphic at a cusp if and only if
[TABLE]
Equivalently, if and only if
[TABLE]
Using the table used to evaluate the values of , we find that for all . As before, using Theorem 2.3 we find that , where the character is given by . Using the same reasoning and (3.5), we find that is divisible by for almost all . This completes the proof of the theorem. ∎
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] Z. Ahmed and N. D. Baruah, New congruences for Andrews’ singular overpartitions , Int. J. Number Theory 11 (2015), 2247–2264.
- 2[2] G. E. Andrews, Singular overpartitions , Int. J. Number Theory 11 (2015), 1523–1533.
- 3[3] V. M. Aricheta, Congruences for Andrews’ ( k , i ) 𝑘 𝑖 (k,i) -singular overpartitions , Ramanujan J. 43 (2017), 535–549.
- 4[4] R. Barman and C. Ray, Congruences for ℓ ℓ \ell -regular overpartitions and Andrews’ singular overpartitions , Ramanujan J. 45 (2018), 497–515.
- 5[5] K. Bringmann and J. Lovejoy, Rank and congruences for overpartition pairs , Int. J. Number Theory 4 (2008), 303–322.
- 6[6] S. C. Chen, M. D. Hirschhorn and J. A. Sellers, Arithmetic properties of Andrews’ singular overpartitions , Int. J. Number Theory 11 (2015), 1463–1476.
- 7[7] S. Corteel and J. Lovejoy, Overpartitions , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 356 (2004), 1623–1635.
- 8[8] B. Gordon and K. Ono, Divisibility of certain partition functions by powers of primes , Ramanujan J. 1 (1997), 25–34.
