# Unsupervised Question Answering by Cloze Translation

**Authors:** Patrick Lewis, Ludovic Denoyer, Sebastian Riedel

arXiv: 1906.04980 · 2020-05-05

## TL;DR

This paper presents an unsupervised method for generating training data for extractive question answering by translating cloze questions into natural questions, enabling high-performance QA without labeled datasets.

## Contribution

The authors introduce a novel unsupervised approach to synthesize QA training data through cloze-to-natural question translation, eliminating the need for manually labeled datasets.

## Key findings

- Achieves 56.4 F1 on SQuAD v1 without using SQuAD training data.
- Outperforms early supervised QA models.
- Effective unsupervised question generation methods.

## Abstract

Obtaining training data for Question Answering (QA) is time-consuming and resource-intensive, and existing QA datasets are only available for limited domains and languages. In this work, we explore to what extent high quality training data is actually required for Extractive QA, and investigate the possibility of unsupervised Extractive QA. We approach this problem by first learning to generate context, question and answer triples in an unsupervised manner, which we then use to synthesize Extractive QA training data automatically. To generate such triples, we first sample random context paragraphs from a large corpus of documents and then random noun phrases or named entity mentions from these paragraphs as answers. Next we convert answers in context to "fill-in-the-blank" cloze questions and finally translate them into natural questions. We propose and compare various unsupervised ways to perform cloze-to-natural question translation, including training an unsupervised NMT model using non-aligned corpora of natural questions and cloze questions as well as a rule-based approach. We find that modern QA models can learn to answer human questions surprisingly well using only synthetic training data. We demonstrate that, without using the SQuAD training data at all, our approach achieves 56.4 F1 on SQuAD v1 (64.5 F1 when the answer is a Named entity mention), outperforming early supervised models.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.04980/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.04980/full.md

## References

49 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.04980/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.04980