# Second-best Beam-Alignment via Bayesian Multi-Armed Bandits

**Authors:** Muddassar Hussain, Nicolo Michelusi

arXiv: 1906.04782 · 2019-08-23

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a Bayesian multi-armed bandit approach for mm-wave beam alignment, optimizing the balance between exploration and exploitation to improve alignment probability and throughput.

## Contribution

It proposes a novel second-best preference policy based on Bayesian bandits, outperforming existing methods in beam alignment tasks.

## Key findings

- Up to 30% improvement in alignment probability.
- Superior performance over Thompson sampling and UCB methods.
- Effective in analog beamforming simulations.

## Abstract

Millimeter-wave (mm-wave) systems rely on narrow-beams to cope with the severe signal attenuation in the mm-wave frequency band. However, susceptibility to beam mis-alignment due to mobility or blockage requires the use of beam-alignment schemes, with huge cost in terms of overhead and use of system resources. In this paper, a beam-alignment scheme is proposed based on Bayesian multi-armed bandits, with the goal to maximize the alignment probability and the data-communication throughput. A Bayesian approach is proposed, by considering the state as a posterior distribution over angles of arrival (AoA) and of departure (AoD), given the history of feedback signaling and of beam pairs scanned by the base-station (BS) and the user-end (UE). A simplified sufficient statistics for optimal control is derived, in the form of preference of BS-UE beam pairs. By bounding a value function, the second-best preference policy is derived, which strikes an optimal balance between exploration and exploitation by selecting the beam pair with the current second-best preference. Through Monte-Carlo simulation with analog beamforming, the superior performance of the second-best preference policy is demonstrated in comparison to existing schemes based on first-best preference, linear Thompson sampling, and upper confidence bounds, with up to 7%, 10% and 30% improvements in alignment probability, respectively.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.04782/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.04782/full.md

## References

18 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.04782/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.04782