# Optimizing Pipelined Computation and Communication for   Latency-Constrained Edge Learning

**Authors:** Nicolas Skatchkovsky, Osvaldo Simeone

arXiv: 1906.04488 · 2019-06-13

## TL;DR

This paper analyzes how to optimize packet size in pipelined communication and computation for edge learning, balancing data transmission and training time constraints to improve model accuracy.

## Contribution

It provides an analytical framework for selecting optimal packet payload size considering communication overhead and computation rate ratios in latency-constrained edge learning.

## Key findings

- Optimal packet size balances bias and variance tradeoff.
- Analytical bounds enable effective optimization.
- Numerical validation confirms the approach's effectiveness.

## Abstract

Consider a device that is connected to an edge processor via a communication channel. The device holds local data that is to be offloaded to the edge processor so as to train a machine learning model, e.g., for regression or classification. Transmission of the data to the learning processor, as well as training based on Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), must be both completed within a time limit. Assuming that communication and computation can be pipelined, this letter investigates the optimal choice for the packet payload size, given the overhead of each data packet transmission and the ratio between the computation and the communication rates. This amounts to a tradeoff between bias and variance, since communicating the entire data set first reduces the bias of the training process but it may not leave sufficient time for learning. Analytical bounds on the expected optimality gap are derived so as to enable an effective optimization, which is validated in numerical results.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.04488/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.04488/full.md

## References

11 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.04488/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.04488