Sampling Humans for Optimizing Preferences in Coloring Artwork
Michael McCourt, Ian Dewancker

TL;DR
This paper reviews a Bayesian optimization method for preference-based optimization, adapts it to handle ties, and discusses challenges faced when humans participate in optimizing artwork coloring.
Contribution
It introduces an adaptation of Bayesian optimization for preferences to include ties and explores human-in-the-loop challenges in artwork coloring tasks.
Findings
Bayesian optimization can be adapted to handle ties in preferences.
Humans encounter specific difficulties when using preference optimization for artwork.
Insights into human-in-the-loop optimization challenges are discussed.
Abstract
Many circumstances of practical importance have performance or success metrics which exist implicitly---in the eye of the beholder, so to speak. Tuning aspects of such problems requires working without defined metrics and only considering pairwise comparisons or rankings. In this paper, we review an existing Bayesian optimization strategy for determining most-preferred outcomes, and identify an adaptation to allow it to handle ties. We then discuss some of the issues we have encountered when humans use this optimization strategy to optimize coloring a piece of abstract artwork. We hope that, by participating in this workshop, we can learn how other researchers encounter difficulties unique to working with humans in the loop.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms · Machine Learning and Data Classification · Data Visualization and Analytics
