# The late-time afterglow evolution of long gamma-ray bursts GRB 160625B and GRB 160509A

## TL;DR

This study analyzes late-time afterglow observations of two long gamma-ray bursts, revealing complex jet behaviors, potential magnetar engines, and challenges to standard jet models through multi-wavelength data and modeling.

## Contribution

It provides detailed post-jet-break observations and modeling of GRB afterglows, highlighting deviations from simple models and suggesting complex jet structures and magnetar central engines.

## Key findings

- Post-break decline inconsistent with simple jet edge models.
- Radio light curves suggest highly chromatic jet breaks.
- Magnetar engine models require extreme parameters.

## Abstract

We present post-jet-break \textit{HST}, VLA and \textit{Chandra} observations of the afterglow of the long $\gamma$-ray bursts GRB 160625B (between 69 and 209 days) and GRB 160509A (between 35 and 80 days). We calculate the post-jet-break decline rates of the light curves, and find the afterglow of GRB 160625B inconsistent with a simple $t^{-3/4}$ steepening over the break, expected from the geometric effect of the jet edge entering our line of sight. However, the favored optical post-break decline ($f_{\nu} \propto t^{-1.96 \pm 0.07}$) is also inconsistent with the $f_{\nu} \propto t^{-p}$ decline (where $p \approx 2.3$ from the pre-break light curve), which is expected from exponential lateral expansion of the jet; perhaps suggesting lateral expansion that only affects a fraction of the jet. The post-break decline of GRB 160509A is consistent with both the $t^{-3/4}$ steepening and with $f_{\nu} \propto t^{-p}$. We also use {\sc boxfit} to fit afterglow models to both light curves and find both to be energetically consistent with a millisecond magnetar central engine, although the magnetar parameters need to be extreme (i.e. $E \sim 3 \times 10^{52}$ erg). Finally, the late-time radio light curves of both afterglows are not reproduced well by {\sc boxfit} and are inconsistent with predictions from the standard jet model; instead both are well represented by a single power law decline (roughly $f_{\nu} \propto t^{-1}$) with no breaks. This requires a highly chromatic jet break ($t_{j,\mathrm{radio}} > 10 \times t_{j,\mathrm{optical}}$) and possibly a two-component jet for both bursts.