Insights on heterogeneity in blinking mechanisms and non-ergodicity using sub-ensemble statistical analysis of single quantum-dots
Amitrajit Mukherjee, Korak Kumar Ray, Chinmay Phadnis, Arunasish, Layek, Soumya Bera, Arindam Chowdhury

TL;DR
This study investigates heterogeneity in blinking mechanisms of quantum dots by analyzing large ensembles with sub-ensemble classification, revealing diverse dynamics, non-ergodicity, and multiple underlying mechanisms.
Contribution
It introduces a sub-classification approach based on emissivity to analyze blinking heterogeneity and demonstrates the non-ergodic nature of quantum dot blinking dynamics.
Findings
Quantum dots exhibit either truncated or pure power-law blinking distributions.
Blinking exponents vary significantly within and across sub-ensembles.
Evidence of non-ergodicity in blinking behavior was observed.
Abstract
Photo-luminescence intermittency (blinking) in semiconductor nanocrystals (NCs), a phenomenon ubiquitous to single-emitters, is generally considered to be temporally random intensity fluctuations between bright (On) and dark (Off) states. However, individual quantum-dots (QDs) rarely exhibit such telegraphic signal, and yet, the vast majority of single-NC blinking data are analyzed using a single fixed threshold, which generates binary trajectories. Further, blinking dynamics can vary dramatically over NCs in the ensemble, and it is unclear whether the exponents (m) of single-particle On-/Off-time distributions (P(t)-On/Off), which are used to validate mechanistic models of blinking, are narrowly distributed or not. Here, we sub-classify an ensemble based on the emissivity of QDs, and subsequently compare the (sub)ensemble behaviors. To achieve this, we analyzed a large number (>1000)…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
