On C-Parallel Legendre Curves in Non-Sasakian Contact Metric Manifolds
Cihan \"Ozg\"ur

TL;DR
This paper characterizes C-parallel and C-proper Legendre curves in non-Sasakian contact metric manifolds, providing curvature conditions and examples to deepen understanding of their geometric properties.
Contribution
It introduces new curvature characterizations of Legendre curves with C-parallel or C-proper mean curvature vectors in non-Sasakian contact metric manifolds, including explicit examples.
Findings
Curvature conditions for C-parallel Legendre curves
Curvature conditions for C-proper Legendre curves
Explicit examples satisfying the conditions
Abstract
In -dimensional non-Sasakian contact metric manifolds, we consider Legendre curves whose mean curvature vector fields are -parallel or -proper in the tangent or normal bundles. We obtain the curvature characterizations of these curves. Moreover, we give some examples of these kinds of curves which satisfy the conditions of our results.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
On -Parallel Legendre Curves
in Non-Sasakian Contact Metric Manifolds
Cihan Özgür
Balıkesir University, Department of Mathematics, 10145, Balıkesir, TURKEY
Abstract.
In -dimensional non-Sasakian contact metric manifolds, we consider Legendre curves whose mean curvature vector fields are -parallel or -proper in the tangent or normal bundles. We obtain the curvature characterizations of these curves. Moreover, we give some examples of these kinds of curves which satisfy the conditions of our results.
1. Introduction
In [6] and [7], Chen studied submanifolds whose mean curvature vector fields satisfy the condition where is a non-zero differentiable function on the submanifold and denotes the Laplacian. Later, in [1], Arroyo, Barros and Garay defined the notion of a submanifold with a proper mean curvature vector field in the normal bundle as a submanifold whose mean curvature vector field satisfies the condition , where denotes the Laplacian in the normal bundle. Furthermore, when the mean curvature vector field of the submanifold satisfies the condition they called the submanifold as a submanifold with a proper mean curvature vector field. In a Riemannian space form, curves with a proper mean curvature vector field in the tangent and normal bundles were studied in [1]. In [2], Kılıç and Arslan studied Euclidean submanifolds satisfying In [12], Kocayiğit and Hacısalihoğlu studied curves satisying in a 3-dimensional Riemannian manifold. For Legendre curves in Sasakian manifolds, same problems were studied by Inoguchi in [10]. In [3], Baikoussis and Blair considered submanifolds in Sasakian space forms . They defined the mean curvature vector field as -parallel if where is a non-zero differentiable function on and the induced Levi-Civita connection. Later, in [13], Lee, Suh and Lee studied curves with -parallel and -proper mean curvature vector fields in the tangent and normal bundles. A curve has -parallel mean curvature vector field if , -proper mean curvature vector field if , -parallel mean curvature vector field in the normal bundle if , -proper mean curvature vector field in the normal bundle if , where is a non-zero differentiable function along the curve , the unit tangent vector field of , the Levi-Civita connection, the normal connection [13].
Let be a contact metric manifold and a Frenet curve in parametrized by the arc-length parameter . The contact angle is a function defined by . If is a constant, then the curve is called a slant curve [8]. If then is called a Legendre curve [5].
In [13], Lee, Suh and Lee studied slant curves with -parallel and -proper mean curvature vector fields in Sasakian 3-manifolds. In [9], Güvenç and the present author studied -parallel and -proper slant curves in -dimensional trans-Sasakian manifolds. Since the paper [9] includes the Legendre curves in Sasakian manifolds, in the present paper, we consider -parallel and -proper Legendre curves in -dimensional non-Sasakian contact metric manifolds.
The paper is organized as follows: In Section 2 and Section 3, in non-Sasakian contact metric manifolds, we consider Legendre curves with -parallel and -proper mean curvature vector fields, respectively. In the final section, we give some examples of Legendre curves which support our theorems.
2. Legendre Curves with -parallel Mean
Curvature Vector Fields
Let be a contact metric manifold. The contact metric structure of is said to be normal if
[TABLE]
where denotes the Nijenhuis torsion of and are vector fields on . A normal contact metric manifold is called a Sasakian manifold [5].
Given a contact Riemannian manifold , the operator is defined by , where denotes the Lie differentiation. The operator is self adjoint and satisfies
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
In a Sasakian manifold, it is clear that
[TABLE]
For more details about contact metric manifolds and their submanifolds, we refer to [5] and [16].
Let be an -dimensional Riemannian manifold. A unit-speed curve is said to be a Frenet curve of osculating order , if there exists positive functions on satisfying
[TABLE]
where and are a -orthonormal vector fields along the curve. The positive functions are called* curvature functions *and is called the Frenet frame field. A geodesic is a Frenet curve of osculating order A circle is a Frenet curve of osculating order with a constant curvature function . A helix of order is a Frenet curve of osculating order with constant curvature functions . A helix of order is simply called a helix.
Now let be a Riemannian manifold and a unit speed Frenet curve of osculating order By a simple calculations, it can be easily seen that
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
(see [9]). Then we have
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
(see [1]).
Let be a non-geodesic Frenet curve in a contact metric manifold . From [9], we give the following relations:
is a curve with -parallel mean curvature vector field if and only if
[TABLE]
is a curve with -proper mean curvature vector field if and only if
[TABLE]
is a curve with -parallel mean curvature vector field in the normal bundle if and only if
[TABLE]
is a curve with -proper mean curvature vector field in the normal bundle if and only if
[TABLE]
where is a non-zero differentiable function along the curve
Now, let be a non-geodesic Legendre curve of osculating order in an -dimensional contact metric manifold. By the use of the definition of a Legendre curve and (2.1), we have
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Differentiating (2.10) and using (2.11), we obtain
[TABLE]
If the osculating order then we have the following results:
Theorem 2.1**.**
There does not exist a non-geodesic Legendre curve of osculating order , which has -parallel mean curvature vector field in a contact metric manifold .
Proof.
Assume that have -parallel mean curvature vector field. From (2.6), we have
[TABLE]
Then taking the inner product of (2.13) with , we find , this means that is a geodesic. This completes the proof. ∎
In the normal bundle, we can state the following theorem:
Theorem 2.2**.**
Let be a non-geodesic Legendre curve of osculating order in a non-Sasakian contact metric manifold. Then has -parallel mean curvature vector field in the normal bundle if and only if
[TABLE]
Proof.
Let have -parallel mean curvature vector field in the normal bundle. From (2.8) we have
[TABLE]
So we have
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Differentiating (2.16), we find
[TABLE]
which gives us
[TABLE]
The converse statement is trivial. Then we complete the proof. ∎
If** **the osculating order , then similar to the proof of Theorem 2.1, we have the following theorem:
Theorem 2.3**.**
There does not exist a non-geodesic Legendre curve of osculating order , which has -parallel mean curvature vector field in a contact metric manifold .
In the normal bundle, we have the following theorem:
Theorem 2.4**.**
Let be a non-geodesic Legendre curve of osculating order in a non-Sasakian contact metric manifold. Then has -parallel mean curvature vector field in the normal bundle if and only if
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
or
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
Proof.
If then from (2.8), we have
[TABLE]
Then taking the inner product of (2.18) with and using (2.12), we find
[TABLE]
This gives us
[TABLE]
Taking the inner product of (2.18) with , we have
[TABLE]
Since , using (2.12) and (2.20), we get
[TABLE]
Since is a unit vector field, we obtain
[TABLE]
If then from (2.8), we have
[TABLE]
which gives us and So by a differentiation of using (2.1), we have Hence, we obtain
[TABLE]
The converse statement is trivial. This completes the proof of the theorem. ∎
3. Legendre Curves with -proper Mean
Curvature Vector Fields
If the osculating order then we have the following theorems:
Theorem 3.1**.**
Let be a non-geodesic Legendre curve of osculating order in a non-Sasakian contact metric manifold. Then has -proper mean curvature vector field if and only if
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Proof.
Let have -proper mean curvature vector field. From (2.7), we have
[TABLE]
Then taking the inner product of (3.1) with , we have . Since is not a geodesic, we obtain which means that is a constant. Taking the inner product of (3.1) with , we have
[TABLE]
Since is a constant, using (2.12), we get
[TABLE]
Furthermore, taking the inner product of (3.1) with and using (2.12), we have
[TABLE]
Then comparing (3.2) and (3.3), we obtain
[TABLE]
Since we have
[TABLE]
The converse statement is trivial. Hence, the proof is finished. ∎
In the normal bundle, we can state the following theorem:
Theorem 3.2**.**
Let be a non-geodesic Legendre curve of osculating order in a non-Sasakian contact metric manifold. Then is a curve with -proper mean curvature vector field in the normal bundle if and only if
i) where and are arbitrary real constants and or
ii) and
Proof.
Let have -proper mean curvature vector field in the normal bundle. From (2.9) we have
[TABLE]
Taking the inner product of (3.5) with and using (2.12), we have
[TABLE]
Taking the inner product of (3.5) with and using (2.12), we find
[TABLE]
Then comparing (3.6) and (3.7), we obtain either , in this case where and are arbitrary real constants and or . If , it is easy to see that and
The converse statement is trivial. This completes the proof of the theorem. ∎
If the osculating order then we have the following theorems:
Theorem 3.3**.**
Let be a non-geodesic Legendre curve of osculating order in a non-Sasakian contact metric manifold. Then is a curve with -proper mean curvature vector field if and only if
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Proof.
Let have -proper mean curvature vector field. Then, from (2.7), we have
[TABLE]
Taking the inner product of (3.8) with , we have . Since is not a geodesic, we find , which gives us is a constant. Now taking the inner product of (3.8) with and using (2.12), we have
[TABLE]
Taking the inner product of (3.8) with , we have
[TABLE]
Since using (2.12) and (3.9) we obtain
[TABLE]
Since is a unit vector field, we have The converse statement is trivial. So we get the result as required. ∎
In the normal bundle, we can give the following result:
Theorem 3.4**.**
Let be a non-geodesic Legendre curve of osculating order in a non-Sasakian contact metric manifold. Then is a curve with -proper mean curvature vector field in the normal bundle if and only if
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Proof.
Let have -proper mean curvature vector field in the normal bundle. From (2.9), is a Legendre curve with
[TABLE]
Taking the inner product of (3.10) with and using (2.12), we have
[TABLE]
Taking the inner product of (3.10) with , we get
[TABLE]
Since using (2.12) and (3.11), we obtain
[TABLE]
Since is a unit vector field, we have The converse statement is trivial. Hence, we complete the proof. ∎
If the osculating order , then we can state the following theorem:
Theorem 3.5**.**
Let be a non-geodesic Legendre curve of osculating order in a non-Sasakian contact metric manifold. Then is a curve with -proper mean curvature vector field if and only if it satisfies
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Proof.
Since has -proper mean curvature vector field, by the use of (2.7), we have
[TABLE]
Taking the inner product of (3.12) with , we have . Since is not a geodesic, we find , which gives us is a constant. Now taking the inner product of (3.12) with and using (2.12), we find
[TABLE]
Taking the inner product of (3.12) with and we get
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
respectively. Since using (3.13) and (3.14), we obtain
[TABLE]
Since is a unit vector field, we have The converse statement is trivial. Thus we get the result as required. ∎
In the normal bundle, we can give the following theorem:
Theorem 3.6**.**
Let be a non-geodesic Legendre curve of osculating order in a non-Sasakian contact metric manifold. Then is a curve with -proper mean curvature vector field in the normal bundle if and only if
[TABLE]
[TABLE]
and
[TABLE]
Proof.
The proof is similar to the proof of Theorem 3.5. ∎
4. Examples
Let us take and denote the standard coordinate functions with . We define the following vector fields on :
[TABLE]
It is seen that , , are linearly independent at all points of . We define a Riemannian metric on such that , , are orthonormal. Then we have
[TABLE]
Let be defined by for all . Let be the -type tensor field defined by , , . Then is a contact metric manifold. Let us set and . Let be the Levi-Civita connection corresponding to which is calculated as
[TABLE]
By the definition of , it is easy to see that
[TABLE]
Hence, is a -contact metric manifold with , , [14].
Example 4.1**.**
Let be the -contact metric manifold given above and let be a curve parametrized by , where is the arc-length parameter on an open interval . The unit tangent vector field along is
[TABLE]
Since , the curve is Legendre. Using (4.1), we find
[TABLE]
which gives us and . Differentiating along the curve , we have
[TABLE]
Thus, we get
[TABLE]
Finally we find
[TABLE]
From Theorem 3.4, has -proper mean curvature vector field in the normal bundle with
Let be the group of rigid motions of Euclidean -space with left invariant Riemannian metric . Then admits its compatible left-invariant contact Riemannian structure if and only if there exists an orthonormal basis of the Lie algebra such that [15]:
[TABLE]
where we choose . The Reeb vector field is obtained by left translation of . The contact distribution is spanned by and . Then using Koszul’s formula, we have the following relations:
[TABLE]
all others are zero (for more details see [15] and [11]). Let us denote by , , . By the definition of , it is easy to see that
[TABLE]
Let be a unit speed Legendre curve with Frenet frame . Let us write
[TABLE]
Since is Legendre, . Using (4.2), we find
[TABLE]
If we choose then
[TABLE]
and we can take constant, constant such that . So we have
[TABLE]
Then using (2.1), (4.2), (4.3) and (4.4), we can write
[TABLE]
Moreover
So, we can state the following example:
Example 4.2**.**
Let* ** be the group of rigid motions of Euclidean -space with left invariant Riemannian metric and has a compatible left-invariant contact Riemannian structure given above. Let be a unit speed Legendre curve of osculating order and the Frenet frame of Then is a Legendre circle with curvature , where the tangent vector field of is and is a constant such that *
Moreover, we have
[TABLE]
From Theorem 3.1, has -proper mean curvature vector field with
Now let us assume that is a unit speed Legendre curve of osculating order with Frenet frame . Similar to the above example, if we choose we find and we can take , where is a constant such that Define a croos product by . So we have . Then using (4.2), we obtain
[TABLE]
which gives us constant.
Hence, we have the following example:
Example 4.3**.**
Let* ** be the group of rigid motions of Euclidean -space with left invariant Riemannian metric and has a compatible left-invariant contact Riemannian structure given above. Let be a unit speed Legendre curve of osculating order and the Frenet frame of Then is a Legendre helix with curvatures and where the tangent vector field of is and is a constant such that *
Moreover, we have
[TABLE]
From Theorem 3.3, has -proper mean curvature vector field in the normal bundle with Furthermore, from Theorem 3.4, has -proper mean curvature vector field in the normal bundle with
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] J. Arroyo, M. Barros, O. J. Garay, A characterization of helices and Cornu spirals in real space forms, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 56 (1997) 37–49.
- 2[2] B. Kılıç, K. Arslan, Harmonic 1 1 1 -type submanifolds of Euclidean spaces, Int. J. Math. Stat. 3 (2008) 47–53.
- 3[3] C. Baikoussis, D. E. Blair, Integral surfaces of Sasakian space forms, J. Geom. 43 (1992) 30–40.
- 4[4] C. Baikoussis, D. E. Blair, On Legendre curves in contact 3 3 3 -manifolds, Geom. Dedicata 49 (1994) 135–142.
- 5[5] D. E. Blair, Riemannian geometry of contact and symplectic manifolds, Birkhauser, Boston, 2002.
- 6[6] B.-Y. Chen, Null 2 2 2 -type surfaces in Euclidean space, Algebra, analysis and geometry (Taipei, 1988), 1–18, World Sci. Publ., Teaneck, NJ, 1989.
- 7[7] B.-Y. Chen, Submanifolds in de Sitter space-time satisfying Δ H = λ H Δ 𝐻 𝜆 𝐻 \Delta H=\lambda H , Israel J. Math. 91 (1995) 373–391.
- 8[8] J. T. Cho, J. Inoguchi, J.-E. Lee, On slant curves in Sasakian 3 3 3 -manifolds, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 74 (2006), no. 3, 359–367.
