Naturalness as a reasonable scientific principle in fundamental physics
Casper Daniel Dijkstra

TL;DR
This paper clarifies the concept of naturalness in fundamental physics, emphasizing the autonomy of scales as the core criterion, and argues that violations of naturalness have significant ontological implications.
Contribution
It defends the autonomy of scales definition of naturalness, distinguishes it from sociological notions, and critiques the applicability of the Decoupling Theorem in quantum field theories.
Findings
AoS naturalness provides a uniform, cogent criterion.
Violations of naturalness imply UV/IR interplay in theories.
Decoupling theorem is insufficient without naturalness.
Abstract
I aim to clarify the physical content and significance of naturalness. Physicists' earliest understanding of naturalness, as an autonomy of scales (AoS) requirement provides the most cogent definition of naturalness and I will assert that i) this provides a uniform notion which undergirds a myriad prominent naturalness conditions, ii) this is a reasonable criterion to impose on EFTs and iii) the successes and violations of naturalness are best understood when adhering to this notion of naturalness. I argue that this principle is neither an aesthetic nor a sociologically-influenced principle. I contend that naturalness may only be plausibly argued to be an aesthetic/sociological principle when formal measures of naturalness and their use in physics communities are conflated with the central dogma of naturalness - the former may indeed be argued to be sociologically-influenced and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBiofield Effects and Biophysics · Quantum Mechanics and Applications · Philosophy and History of Science
