Homogeneous Finsler sphere with constant flag curvature
Ming Xu

TL;DR
This paper proves that homogeneous Finsler spheres with constant flag curvature 1 and certain geodesic properties are necessarily Riemannian, and explores geodesic behavior on such spheres, extending results beyond Randers metrics.
Contribution
It establishes that such spheres with specific geodesic conditions are Riemannian and extends geodesic properties to non-Randers homogeneous Finsler spheres.
Findings
Homogeneous Finsler spheres with constant flag curvature 1 and a prime closed geodesic of length 2π are Riemannian.
Provides evidence for the non-existence of homogeneous Bryant spheres.
Generalizes geodesic properties from Randers to non-Randers homogeneous Finsler spheres.
Abstract
We prove that a homogeneous Finsler sphere with constant flag curvature and a prime closed geodesic of length must be Riemannian. This observation provides the evidence for the non-existence of homogeneous Bryant spheres. It also helps us propose an alternative approach proving that a geodesic orbit Finsler sphere with must be Randers. Then we discuss the behavior of geodesics on a homogeneous Finsler sphere with . We prove that many geodesic properties for homogeneous Randers spheres with can be generalized to the non-Randers case.
| No. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||||
| 2 | ||||
| 3 | ||||
| 4 | ||||
| 5 | ||||
| 6 |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Differential Geometry Research
Homogeneous Finsler sphere with constant flag curvature
Ming Xu
School of Mathematical Sciences
Capital Normal University
Beijing 100048, P. R. China
Email: [email protected]
Abstract
We prove that a homogeneous Finsler sphere with constant flag curvature and a prime closed geodesic of length must be Riemannian. This observation provides the evidence for the non-existence of homogeneous Bryant spheres. It also helps us propose an alternative approach proving that a geodesic orbit Finsler sphere with must be Randers. Then we discuss the behavior of geodesics on a homogeneous Finsler sphere with . We prove that many geodesic properties for homogeneous Randers spheres with can be generalized to the non-Randers case.
Mathematics Subject Classification (2000): 53C30, 53C60.
Key words: antipodal map, closed geodesic, constant flag curvature, homogeneous Finsler sphere, homogeneous geodesic, Randers metric
1 Introduction
The classification of Finsler spheres with and constant flag curvature is one of the most intriguing open problems in Finsler geometry. The Riemannian one is unique, i.e. it must be the unit sphere with the submanifold metric induced from the Euclidean space, which we will simply call the standard Riemannian metric. The Randers ones are classified by D. Bao, C. Robles and Z. Shen, which are defined by a navigation process from a standard Riemannian metric and a Killing vector field [9]. The affects of Killing navigation on the geometry of Finsler manifolds are well understood [12, 13, 14]. Though the behavior of geodesics is much different with that of the Riemannian one [1, 16], the Randers spheres with can still be viewed as the standard space forms in Finsler geometry.
There exist much more complicated Finsler metrics on spheres with . For example, R. Bryant constructed non-Randers Finsler metrics on with , such that their geodesics (as point sets) are great circles [2, 3, 4]. We will simply call them Bryant spheres for simplicity. A significant feature of Bryant spheres is that they are projectively flat. All geodesics of a Bryant sphere are closed. Applying some more discussion for its antipodal map (see [20] or Section 2 for this notion), it is easy to see that all prime closed geodesics on a Bryant sphere have the same length .
From the view point of Lie theory, we see that a Bryant sphere may admit some degree of isometric symmetry, i.e. the connected isometry group may have a positive dimension. But until now, no homogeneous Bryant spheres have been found.
The first main theorem of this paper explains this phenomenon.
Theorem 1.1
Assume that is a homogeneous Finsler sphere with and , and there exists a prime closed geodesic of length (or equivalently, the order of its antipodal map is 2). Then must be Riemannian.
The proof of Theorem 1.1 is based on an observation for the geodesic orbit (g.o. in short) properties of the standard Riemannian metric on a unit sphere, with respect to different transitive isometric group actions, and a comparison between and , concerning their antipodal maps and respectively, and the indicatrices they define in each tangent space.
Here are two immediate corollaries of Theorem 1.1. The notion of Bryant sphere requires the flag curvature and the existence of prime closed geodesics of length , so we get the first corollary, i.e.
Corollary 1.2
There does not exist any homogeneous Bryant sphere.
It is easy to see that on a reversible Finsler sphere with and , the order of its antipodal map is 2, so all geodesics are closed and all prime closed geodesics have the same length (see Lemma 2.1 in Section 2). So we have the second corollary of Theorem 1.1, i.e.
Corollary 1.3
Any reversible homogeneous Finsler sphere with is Riemannian.
Notice that in 2006, R. Bryant proved the following theorem [5].
Theorem 1.4
Any reversible Finsler 2-sphere with is Riemannian.
Later in 2009, C. Kim and K. Min discussed the generalization of Theorem 1.4 to high dimensions. Comparing their argument to that for Corollary 1.3, we see that this problem is much simpler in the homogeneous context.
Using Theorem 1.1, we can provide a more self contained proof of the following theorem in [22], without using [17] (i.e. Theorem 6.2 in [22]).
Theorem 1.5
Any geodesic orbit Finsler sphere with is Randers.
By the classification of geodesic orbit Finsler spheres in [22], Theorem 1.5 can be equivalently stated as the following.
Theorem 1.6
Let be a homogeneous Finsler sphere such that it has constant flag curvature , and its connected isometry group is not isomorphic to if for some positive integer . Then must be Randers.
Then we discuss the behavior of geodesics on a homogeneous Finsler sphere with . The Riemannian case and the (non-Riemannian) Randers case are well understood. They provide models and motivations for our previous works estimating the number of orbits of prime closed geodesics on Finsler spheres with [23, 25] and homogeneous Finsler spaces [24]. We show that many properties of the geodesics on a homogeneous Randers sphere with can be generalized to the non-Randers case. For the precise statement, see Theorem 4.2 in Section 4, which is a homogeneous analog of Theorem 2 in [7].
Finally, we remark that, the existence of non-Randers homogeneous Finsler spheres with (which must be of type according to the classification of homogeneous spheres in [18]) is still an open problem. Recently, L. Huang and X. Mo constructed new examples of invariant Einstein Finsler metrics on the homogeneous sphere [15]. Their method also sheds light on solving this open problem.
This paper is organized as following. In Section 2, we summarize some necessary knowledge on Finsler geometry and homogeneous geometry. In Section 3, we prove Theorem 1.1, and sketch an alternative approach proving Theorem 1.5 (Theorem 6.2 in [22]). In Section 3, we discuss the behavior of geodesics on a homogeneous Finsler sphere with . In particular, we propose Theorem 4.2, concerning the non-Randers homogeneous Finsler spheres with . In Section 4, we prove Theorem 4.2.
2 Preliminaries
Firstly, we summarize some fundamental knowledge on Finsler geometry. See [6, 10, 21] for more details.
The Finsler metric on a connected smooth manifold is a continuous function satisfying the following conditions:
(1) is positive and smooth when restricted to the slit tangent bundle .
(2) is positively homogeneous of degree one, i.e. for any and , when .
(3) is strongly convex, i.e. for any standard local coordinates and on , the Hessian is positive definite when .
We will also call a Finsler manifold or a Finsler space. We say is reversible if for any and any .
On one hand, the Hessian matrices define an inner product
[TABLE]
which depends on the nonzero vector . Sometimes, we denote this inner product as and call it the fundamental tensor.
On the other hand, the Finsler metric defines the arc length of a curve and the distance function on . By the local minimizing principle, geodesics can be similarly defined as in Riemannian geometry. In this paper, we will only consider geodesics with positive constant speeds, i.e. .
A Finsler metric is Riemannian iff the fundamental tensor is independent of the nonzero vector . The most important and simplest non-Riemannian metric is Randers metric, which is of the form , in which is a Riemannian metric and is a one-form. A Randers metric can be also determined by the navigation process from the datum , in which is a Riemannian metric, and is a vector field satisfying everywhere, such that for any and . A geometrical description for the navigation process is the following. At each point , the indicatrix is the parallel shifting of the indicatrix by the vector .
The flag curvature (or simply sometimes), where is a tangent plane in , is defined as
[TABLE]
in which is the Riemann curvature.
The explicit presentations of geodesics and curvatures using local coordinates can be found in the references previously given.
Secondly, we introduce the antipodal map for a Finsler sphere with constant flag curvature .
Assume that is a Finsler sphere with and . Then all geodesic rays starting at will meet again, after the same arc length , at another point [20]. For each , is the unique point satisfying .
The map from to is an isometry of [7]. Further more, is a Clifford–Wolf translation which belongs to the center of [25]. By the previous observation, the -orbit of , i.e. for all , is contained in any geodesic passing .
We simply call the antipodal map [25]. For the standard Riemannian metric on the unit sphere , its antipodal map is the classical one, i.e. .
The order of in is the minimal positive integer with , or if such an integer does not exist. The antipodal map for a Bryant sphere [2, 3, 4] has the order . In Finsler geometry, we will usually meet the situation that or [7]. The order of the antipodal map is a crucial index determining the behavior of geodesics on a Finsler sphere with . For example, we have the following easy lemma.
Lemma 2.1
Assume is a homogeneous Finsler sphere with and . Then the following statements are equivalent:
(1)* The antipodal map satisfies ;*
(2)* Each geodesic is closed and the length of each prime closed geodesic is ;*
(3)* Any prime closed geodesic has the same length ;*
(4)* There exists a prime closed geodesic of length .*
Proof. We first prove the statement from (1) to (2). Assume . Let be any -unit geodesic with and . Then is a shortest geodesic from to . Because is a Clifford–Wolf translation on , and , the closed curve is smooth at and , i.e. it is a prime closed geodesic with the length . This proves the statement from (1) to (2).
The statements from (2) to (3) is obvious.
The statement from (3) to (4) follows immediately the existence of closed geodesics on any closed Finsler manifold [11]. In particular, when the isometry group has a positive dimension, we can apply Lemma 3.1 in [23] to find two distinct prime closed geodesics.
The statement from (4) to (1) follows immediately the definition of the antipodal map and the homogeneity of .
This ends the proof of this lemma.
Lastly, we recall the definition of homogeneous geodesics and geodesic orbit property in Finsler geometry [26].
Assume the connected Finsler manifold admits the non-trivial isometric action of a connected Lie group . We call a geodesic -homogeneous, if for some and , i.e. this geodesic is the orbit of some one-parameter subgroup of . We call a -geodesic orbit (or g.o. in short) Finsler space, if all geodesics on are -homogeneous. If is not specified, the assumption is automatically taken. Obviously, any connected -g.o. Finsler space is -homogeneous.
In [22], we have classified the geodesic orbit Finsler spheres by the following theorem, which generalizes a theorem of Yu.G. Nikonorov in the Riemannian context [19].
Theorem 2.2
A homogeneous Finsler sphere is g.o. unless with for some positive integer .
We will also need the following result in [8] or [19] for the g.o. properties of the standard Riemannian metric on a unit sphere, with respect to different transitive isometric group actions.
Lemma 2.3
For any closed connected subgroup acting transitively on the unit sphere with , the standard Riemannian metric on is -g.o..
3 Proofs of Theorem 1.1 and Theorem 1.5
Assume is a homogeneous Finsler sphere with and .
When , all possible homogeneous presentations are given by Table 1.
Here are some remarks. In Case 1, the metric is Riemannian symmetric. This case covers , and . In particular, all even dimensional homogeneous spheres belong to this case. So we only need to discuss the odd dimensional homogeneous spheres in later discussion. For the -homogeneous Finsler sphere with , it may be presented as when , and it is -homogeneous when . In case 5, we identify with the set of all quaternion numbers with norm one, acting on column vectors in by right scalar multiplications. Then represents the image of in , such that is mapped to the linear automorphism for each column vector . Case 4 is similar to case 5.
Checking each case in Table 1, we observe that can be canonically identified as a closed subgroup of , and meanwhile is identified as the unit sphere
[TABLE]
where is the standard Euclidean norm, such that the -action on is induced by the left -multiplications on column vectors.
Now on , we have two -homogeneous Finsler metrics satisfying . One is the metric , and the other is standard Riemannian metric . The following lemma indicates their antipodal maps coincide.
Lemma 3.1
Assume is a closed subgroup of acting transitively on the odd dimensional unit sphere with , and is a -invariant Finsler metric on with and , where is the antipodal map for . Then we have for any .
Proof. We may assume and only need to discuss the cases No. 2-6 in Table 1. By Lemma 2.1, the assumption that implies that all geodesics on are closed and all prime closed geodesics on have the same length .
We observe that for each case, the negative identity matrix belongs to . For the cases No. 2-5, this fact is obvious. For the case No. 6, the -action on is induced by the isotropy action for . Because is a symmetric space with an involution for some . It implies that the isotropy action of satisfies , . Another approach for the case No. 6 is that we can identify the Euclidean space as and as the subgroup of consisting of all elements which map Octonionic lines to Octonionic lines. Because satisfies this description, so we have . To summarize, we have proved that in each case is contained in .
Denote the antipodal map for the standard Riemannian metric on the unit sphere . Since and acts isometrically and transitively on , is a Clifford Wolf translation for . Take any and any shortest geodesic for , from to , then is a prime closed geodesic, which length is . So the length of , from to , is , for each . This ends the proof of the lemma.
The coincidence between the antipodal maps suggests us to compare and . Then we get the following lemma.
Lemma 3.2
Let be a -invariant Finsler metric on with and , where is a closed connected subgroup of which acts transitively on . Let be the standard Riemannian metric on . Then for any and any , we have .
Proof. Without loss of generality, we may assume .
Let be the -unit speed geodesic on such that , and . By Lemma 2.3, we can find , such that . Because the -actions are isometries for , each integration curve of have a constant -speed, so we have . By Lemma 3.1, , so we have
[TABLE]
i.e. , which proves this lemma.
Theorem 1.1 follows Lemma 3.2 easily.
Proof of Theorem 1.1. Assume conversely that . By Lemma 3.2, there exist a point and a -unit tangent vector such that . Let be the -unit speed geodesic from to , with , and . Then by Lemma 3.2 and out assumption that , the -length of from to satisfies
[TABLE]
This is a contradiction because .
This ends the proof of Theorem 1.1.
In the rest of this section, we sketch an alternative proof of Theorem 1.5 which does not need [17].
Proof of Theorem 1.5. Without loss of generality, we assume that is a Finsler metric on with and , such that its connected isometry group is a closed connected subgroup of . By Theorem 2.2, we may assume that there exists a closed connected subgroup which acts transitively on and is presented as in Table 1, except No. 3.
For the cases No. 5 and No. 6, the homogeneous spheres and are weakly symmetric, so the -invariant metric is reversible [22]. In these cases we have because for any , . By Theorem 1.1, must be Riemannian (which is also Randers).
For the cases No. 2 and No. 4, has a one-dimensional center which provides Killing vector fields of constant length on . As shown in Section 6 of [22], after a suitable Killing navigation defined by the datum with , we can get a homogeneous Finsler sphere with and . By Theorem 1.1, is Riemannian, so must be Randers.
To summarize, in each case we have proved that is Randers, which ends the proof of Theorem 1.5.
4 Behavior of the geodesics on a homogeneous Finsler sphere with
In this section, we discuss the behavior of geodesics on a homogeneous Finsler sphere with .
The Riemannian case.
When is Riemannian, i.e. it coincides with the standard Riemannian metric on . All geodesics are closed, and all prime closed geodesics (i.e. the great circles) have the same length and belong to the same -orbit. Here the action of , where is the connected isometry group, on the space of all closed geodesics with is induced by that on the free loop space, i.e. acts on the target Finsler manifold, and rotates the parameter.
The known examples of closed Finsler manifold with only one orbit of prime closed geodesics are compact rank-one symmetric spaces. This observation inspire us to ask if they are the only ones. A partial answer for this rigidity problem from the positive side has been given in homogenous Finsler geometry (see Theorem 1.4 in [24]).
The Randers case.
When is non-Riemannian Randers, it is defined by the navigation process with the datum , in which is the standard Riemannian metric on , and is a nonzero Killing vector field [9]. The homogeneity of requires that is of constant -length. In this case is an odd number, the connected isometry group , and is defined by a vector in with . By [12, 14], The affect of the Killing navigation process on the geodesics can be explicitly described.
Notice that are Killing vector fields of constant length for , and they generates the center of . So each integration curve of is a closed geodesic on . We denote the lengths of the prime closed geodesics generated by . It is well known that . To be more self contained, we propose a proof of it which do not require to be Randers and thus can be applied to later discussion.
Lemma 4.1
Let be a Finsler sphere with . Suppose that both for and for are prime closed geodesics with constant -speeds, which lengths are denoted as and respectively. Then we have .
Proof. Assume for is the image for the antipodal map of . The arc length of for is , while that for is . Because has a constant speed, we have . For a similar reason, . Adding these two equalities, then the lemma is proved.
When the -length of is an irrational multiple of , there are no other prime closed geodesics except those two -orbits of prime closed geodesics generated by , which lengths are irrational multiples of . This is an important basic model for studying Finsler spheres with and only finite orbits of prime closed geodesics [24].
When the -length of is a rational multiple of , the antipodal map has a finite order . All geodesics are closed. The prime closed geodesics generated by satisfies that their lengths are rational multiples of , and . Because , the integration curves of provides one or two -orbits of short prime closed geodesics. All other prime closed geodesics have the same length .
The non-Randers case.
By Theorem 1.1 and Theorem 1.5, the homogeneous Finsler sphere with and may be non-Randers only when there exists a positive integer , such that , and . Meanwhile, the antipodal map must have a finite order .
As in the proof of Theorem 1.1, we may identify the homogeneous Finsler sphere as the unit sphere , on which we have the transitive -action induced by the left -multiplications on column vectors in . Then the metric is defined on which is -invariant.
We will prove the following theorem in the next section, which implies that many properties for the behavior of geodesics on a homogeneous Randers Finsler sphere with can be generalized to the non-Randers case. It is also a homogeneous analog of Theorem 2 in [7].
Theorem 4.2
Let be a -invariant Finsler metric on such that it has constant flag curvature and the order of its antipodal map is a finite number . Then we have the following:
(1)* The antipodal map generates a subgroup in the right -multiplications on . The metric is homogeneous with respect to the action of .*
(2)* There exists a -invariant vector field on , such that the integration curves of are the only closed geodesics for both and the standard Riemannian metric on .*
(3)* Denote the lengths of the prime closed geodesics generated by , then are rational multiples of , where is the order of the antipodal map for . In particular, we have .*
(4)* All geodesics are closed and all prime closed geodesics which are not integration curves of have the same length .*
5 Proof of Theorem 4.2
As preparation, we first discuss an -homogeneous Finsler sphere such that the flag curvature , and the antipodal map has a finite order . The unit sphere , as well as , can be identified as the subset of quaternion numbers with norm one, and the -action on is the left multiplication. The metric is invariant under left multiplications of .
For any one-parameter subgroup , the orbits of the left and right multiplications by on are great circles. So any -homogeneous geodesic on is a great circle.
Let be the antipodal map, and assume . Because commutes with all the left -multiplications, we get for any . Obviously is a primitive -root of , i.e. and when , because the order of is .
To summarize, we get
Claim I. There exists a primitive -th root of , , such that for any .
By Claim I, generates a cyclic subgroup of right -multiplications for all , and the metric is homogeneous with respect to the action of .
Denote this subgroup , its isotropy subgroup at is isomorphic to when is odd, or when is even. By the assumption , is always nontrivial. The isotropy action of splits the Lie algebra as a linear direct sum , which is orthogonal with respect to the Killing form, so that acts trivially on the one dimensional subspace and rotates the two dimensional subspaces .
Let be any nonzero vector in . Then for any , any , we have and
[TABLE]
Take the sum of (5.1) for all , and apply the equality , we get which implies that the one-parameter subgroup generated by is an -homogeneous geodesic on .
To summarize, we get
Claim II. Any nonzero vector generates a one parameter subgroup which is a geodesic on for both directions.
Denote the vector field defined by , , for any nonzero . Because is left invariant and , it is easy to see that is contained in the flow generated by , and the integration curves of provide two orbits of homogeneous geodesics.
As point sets, there exists no other homogeneous geodesics on . The reason is the following. Any homogeneous geodesics on is a great circle. If it contains some , it contains the -orbit of , which has more than two points. So the great circle passing them is unique.
Now we are ready to discuss the general case and prove Theorem 4.2.
Proof of Theorem 4.2.
(1) Denote , the isotropy subgroup corresponds to the left-up -block in . As commutes with , i.e. the left -multiplications, each point in the -orbit of is fixed by . So is contained in the fixed point set
[TABLE]
We may assume , then the -invariance of implies for any column vector . Meanwhile, we see is a primitive -th root of . So generates a subgroup of the right scalar multiplications, and the metric is homogeneous with respect to the action of .
This proves (1) of the theorem.
(2) The fixed point set is totally geodesic -homogeneous submanifold in , so it has constant flag curvature , and its antipodal map coincides with the restriction of , which has the same finite order . Claim II provides a vector field for some , which integration curves are homogeneous geodesics in both directions. The vector field can be naturally extended by left -invariance to , such that for any , is contained in the flow generated by , and all integration curves of are geodesics for both and the standard Riemannian metric .
Because the great circle containing any -orbit is unique, there does not exist any other geodesics on for both and .
This ends the proof of (2).
(3) Let be the lengths of the prime closed geodesics generated by , where is the nonzero left invariant vector field in (2). Because the order of is , and is a Clifford–Wolf translation, any geodesic segment of length on is a closed geodesic. So we have . On the other hand, is obvious. By Lemma 4.1, we get the equality .
This proves (3) of Theorem 4.2.
(4) Assume that with is an -unit speed geodesic, which provides a prime closed geodesic of length . Then we only need to prove is an integration curve of the vector field (or ) in (2).
Obviously we have and for any and . Because for is also a closed geodesic, we have for some positive integer . The integers and must be co-prime to each other, otherwise by the homogeneity of , the order of will be smaller than .
Denote for , in which for is the largest integer smaller than . Because the -orbit for contains exactly points, we have . Because and , we can find some integer , , such that . The geodesic for is the shortest geodesic from to .
Now we switch to the -invariant vector field in (2). Then the integration curve of passing is a reversible geodesic containing the -orbit of , with positive constant -speed for both directions. We can suitably choose or , such that its integration curve from to does not pass . Then it is the shortest geodesic from to and .
Because , the shortest geodesic from to is unique. So as point sets, the geodesic coincides with an integration curve of .
This proves (4) in the theorem.
Acknowledgement. The author sincerely thank Vladimir S. Matveev, Yuri G. Nikonorov and Wolfgang Ziller for helpful discussions and suggestions. This paper is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11821101, No. 11771331), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (No. 00719210010001, No. 1182006), Capacity Building for Sci-Tech Innovation – Fundamental Scientific Research Funds (No. KM201910028021).
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1[1] D.V. Anosov, Geodesics in Finsler geometry, in: Proc. I. C. M., Vancouver, BC 1974, Montreal, 2 (1975), 293-297 (in Russian); Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. 109 (1977), 81-85.
- 2[2] R.L. Bryant, Finsler structures on the 2-sphere satisfying K = 1 𝐾 1 K=1 , Contemp. Math., 196 , (1996), 27-41.
- 3[3] R.L. Bryant, Projectively flat Finsler 2-spheres of constant curvature, Sel. Math., 3 (1997), 161-203.
- 4[4] R.L. Bryant, Some remarks on Finsler manifolds with constant flag curvature, Houst. J. Math., 28 (2002), 221-262.
- 5[5] R.L. Bryant, Geodesically reversible Finsler 2-spheres of constant curvature, Nankai Tracts in Mathematics Inspired by S.S. Chern 11 (2006), 95-111.
- 6[6] D. Bao, S.S. Chern, Z. Shen, An Introduction to Riemann-Finsler Geometry, G. T. M. 200 , Springer, New York, 2000.
- 7[7] R.L. Bryant, P. Foulon, S. Ivanov, V.S. Matveev, W. Ziller, Geodesic behavior for Finsler metrics of constant positive flag curvature on S 2 superscript 𝑆 2 S^{2} , J. Differential Geom. (to appear), ar Xiv:1710.03736.
- 8[8] V.N. Berestovskii, Yu.G. Nikonorov, Generalized normal homogeneous Riemannian metrics on spheres and projective spaces, Ann. Glob. Anal. Geom., 45 (3) (2014), 167-196.
