Fair Division Without Disparate Impact
Alexander Peysakhovich, Christian Kroer

TL;DR
This paper explores modifying the competitive equilibrium from equal incomes (CEEI) mechanism to ensure fair division without disparate impact, analyzing the tradeoffs between fairness, efficiency, and other desirable properties.
Contribution
It introduces two modified algorithms, equitable equilibrium and competitive equilibrium from equitable incomes, to address disparate impact in fair division, and analyzes their theoretical and experimental properties.
Findings
Removing disparate impact in outcomes breaks key properties like envy and Pareto optimality.
Removing disparate impact in utility levels preserves these properties.
Experimental results highlight tradeoffs between fairness, efficiency, and impact.
Abstract
We consider the problem of dividing items between individuals in a way that is fair both in the sense of distributional fairness and in the sense of not having disparate impact across protected classes. An important existing mechanism for distributionally fair division is competitive equilibrium from equal incomes (CEEI). Unfortunately, CEEI will not, in general, respect disparate impact constraints. We consider two types of disparate impact measures: requiring that allocations be similar across protected classes and requiring that average utility levels be similar across protected classes. We modify the standard CEEI algorithm in two ways: equitable equilibrium from equal incomes, which removes disparate impact in allocations, and competitive equilibrium from equitable incomes which removes disparate impact in attained utility levels. We show analytically that removing disparate impact…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLaw, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
