# Generating Question-Answer Hierarchies

**Authors:** Kalpesh Krishna, Mohit Iyyer

arXiv: 1906.02622 · 2019-07-23

## TL;DR

This paper introduces SQUASH, a new task for generating hierarchical question-answer structures from documents, enabling interactive exploration of content through specificity-controlled questions.

## Contribution

It proposes a novel question hierarchy generation task and a neural model pipeline, with extensive evaluation demonstrating high-quality results.

## Key findings

- Effective hierarchy generation demonstrated in crowdsourced evaluations
- Model successfully distinguishes between general and specific questions
- Hierarchies improve document comprehension and navigation

## Abstract

The process of knowledge acquisition can be viewed as a question-answer game between a student and a teacher in which the student typically starts by asking broad, open-ended questions before drilling down into specifics (Hintikka, 1981; Hakkarainen and Sintonen, 2002). This pedagogical perspective motivates a new way of representing documents. In this paper, we present SQUASH (Specificity-controlled Question-Answer Hierarchies), a novel and challenging text generation task that converts an input document into a hierarchy of question-answer pairs. Users can click on high-level questions (e.g., "Why did Frodo leave the Fellowship?") to reveal related but more specific questions (e.g., "Who did Frodo leave with?"). Using a question taxonomy loosely based on Lehnert (1978), we classify questions in existing reading comprehension datasets as either "general" or "specific". We then use these labels as input to a pipelined system centered around a conditional neural language model. We extensively evaluate the quality of the generated QA hierarchies through crowdsourced experiments and report strong empirical results.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.02622/full.md

## Figures

7 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.02622/full.md

## References

56 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.02622/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.02622