# Study of Monte Carlo event generators for proton-proton collisions at   LHC energies in the forward region

**Authors:** Alexandru Catalin Ene, Alexandru Jipa, Lavinia-Elena Giubega

arXiv: 1906.02523 · 2019-09-04

## TL;DR

This study compares various Monte Carlo event generators for proton-proton collisions at LHC energies, analyzing their predictions against experimental data in the forward region to evaluate their accuracy and differences.

## Contribution

It provides a comprehensive comparison of PYTHIA, EPOS, QGSJET, and SIBYLL generators against LHCb and TOTEM data in the forward region, highlighting their predictive differences.

## Key findings

- Most predictions are within the range of experimental measurements.
- Differences are mainly due to extrapolation from central pseudorapidity region.
- Generators generally perform well within the measured phase-space.

## Abstract

In this paper we present a comparative study between PYTHIA, EPOS, QGSJET, and SIBYLL generators. The global event observables considered are the charged energy flow, charged-particle distributions, charged-hadron production ratios and $V^{0}$ ratios. The study is performed in the LHCb and TOTEM fiducial phase-spaces on minimum bias simulated data samples for \emph{pp} collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV using reference measurements from the aforementioned experiments. In the majority of cases, the measurements are within a band defined by the most extreme predictions. The observed differences between the predictions and the measurements seem to be, in most part, caused by extrapolation from the central pseudorapidity region ($|\eta| \leq$ 2.5), in which the generators were mainly tuned.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.02523/full.md

## Figures

33 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.02523/full.md

## References

42 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.02523/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/1906.02523